Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
For presumed consent: Dr Tony Calland
If the National Organ Taskforce rejects the idea of a move towards a system of presumed consent now, we hope it will not rule out future consideration of this option.
The British Medical Association (BMA) supports a “soft” system of presumed consent, where individuals who do not want to donate organs can register that objection and families are consulted to identify any unregistered objections. We believe this is more likely than the current system to ensure that the individual’s wishes are respected. Every year people die because a donor cannot be found to allow their transplant to go ahead. Evidence from other countries has shown that a system of presumed consent can save lives.
Of course, a system of presumed consent is not in itself a magical cure and the BMA has already stated that it strongly supports the series of measures proposed by the taskforce. We very much hope that these proposals will greatly enhance donation rates and will do whatever we can to help promote that goal.
Dr Tony Calland is the chairman of the Medical Ethics Committee of the BMA
Against: Rafael Matesanz and John Fabre
Last year, the Government embarked on a campaign to convince the nation that an “opt out” or “presumed consent” system for organ donation would improve the rate of donation. This decision, supported by the British Medical Association, is very curious given the weakness of the evidence supporting presumed consent as a factor in organ donation.
Our view is that it contributes little or nothing to the improvement of organ donation rates and diverts resources to imaginary solutions. An effective transplant coordination network, as recommended by the Department of Health’s Organ Donation Taskforce, is the measure that would really make a difference. The idea that the absence of an objection represents informed consent is plainly nonsense, and consent that is not informed is valueless.
Rafael Matesanz is the National Transplant Co-ordinator for the National Transplant Organisation in Spain. John Fabre is a Professor in the Department of Hepatology and Transplantation at King’s College London School of Medicine
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more




Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If you're dead you dont not need your organs. Nobody is saying they become public property, but they become the property of society or the community left to deal with them. If we can use them for the best of society then we should. we should not let superstition get in the way.
Tom, Leeds, UK
We arrive with nothing and achieve little by trying to take our remains with us. I have donated all my remains to research.You need to arrange this well in advance and it is not as easy as it might be. I regard my body as I tent which I will no longer occupy on my departure
V Cooper, Somerset, UK
To be valid, consent must surely be properly informed. I am concerned that many of the 15 million people who have registered as potential organ donors on the NHS ODR may have done so in the belief that they will be unequivocally dead before their organs are removed. That is not so, of course.
David Evans, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire
That other actions need to be taken as well (e.g. more intensive care units and qualified surgical staff) is not an argument to prevent 'presumed consent' being implemented. Both are required. Let us do each of them just as soon as possible.
Peter eldridge, Fleet, Hants.
How would you go about withholding your consent? There will have to be a government database. As ever, this will be incomplete, inaccurate, inaccessible when wanted, made freely available to other government departments and busybodies, and ultimately lost in a train.
Get a chest tattoo instead!
Richard Cooper, Dunstable,
Gordon Brown is behaving not like a democratically elected Prime Minister but, rather, like a divinely appointed king who owns the bodies of his subjects.
He is proposing to ride roughshod over the fundamental principle that a free human being has ownership of his own body.
tim, haywards heath, uk
I have read that some organs cannot be taken from truly dead bodies and are actually taken from the living bodies of those presumed brain dead. There is always an outside chance therefore that donating an organ causes the physical death of a loved one
Clifford, reading,
Organ donation is an excellent idea. You have no need for them after you are dead. Let someone else make good use of them.
Wes, Worcester,
I work for several bereavement charities and have helped the government with getting the law changed after the Alder Hey organ retention scandal. I am aware of several people on the waiting list who would only accept organs freely given. I am not in favour of presumed consent.
Jan, West Kirby, UK
Against.
Human organs are not public property. Those fearful that their lives may be terminated early to obtain their organs;or that their organs may be sold; or that they may feel pain from the removal; or that their withheld consent may be over-ridden need a more robust option than an opt-out.
Sue, Felpham,
I am 100% in favour of organ donation and would be delighted to think that my organs could help someone else.
However I am 100% against "presumed consent". Why should the onus be on anyone to declare their opposition?
My body is mine, and without my consent it remains mine to rot in the grave.
rog, York, England