Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
To read more stories by Lesley White, click on panel of links, below left
”That counsellor I’ve been seeing…” That was his opening. I nodded, carefully. I’m sure I also smiled.
“She’d like you to come into our next session.”
“Of course,” I said, warmly. “Is there a particular reason?”
I must have raised an eyebrow.
“Yes,” he said. “She’d like to discuss your anger.”
“My anger?” I’m afraid I began to lose my cool at that point. “Why would this woman want to talk to me about my anger?”
“Because of what it’s doing to us,” he said.
Now that really hurt my feelings. No, worse than that. It confused me. Here I was, thinking we were happier than we’d ever been in all our 19 years together, and there he was, going to this counsellor woman and painting me as some sort of…
Which I might have been, once upon a time. Well, more than once. I’ll be the first to admit it. For most of my life, anger has been my fuel. According to my mother, I was such an aggressive little girl that her friends refused to bring their children to my first birthday party unless she promised to keep me in my playpen.
So they asked her: “What are you going to do to curb your daughter’s aggression?” It is to my mother’s credit that she responded to the question, and the subtext, by choosing to do nothing. Which may explain why I was so confident at school. Although it might also explain why…
But let’s not go there. Let me just say that when I look back at the years when I was anger personified, I have to struggle to remember why. My guess is that a lot of it had to do with expecting life to be fair. Now that I’m older, I know that it just isn’t. Or, to put it differently, I know why there is almost always such a great distance between life as it might be and life as it really is. This means I don’t resent friends or loved ones who let me down. Instead I try to accept them as they are, and try to understand them. Which is why I agreed to go along to see this counsellor of his. Because I knew that – even if it was absolutely preposterous, this harridan blaming everything on “my” anger – it was clearly a problem for him for some reason, and where better to discuss it than in a neutral space in front of a witness?
That said, I was still smarting from the implied insult. I had other qualms, too. What if I was walking into a trap? This woman was bound to be biased. He was her client, after all. She had to be. On the other hand, I was no spring chicken. I knew how to hold my own. I would make it clear that I had arrived with an open mind. While also letting the counsellor woman know, just by the way I placed my hands oh so gently on my lap, that I wasn’t to be trifled with.
Because at my age, the one thing I don’t have time for is time-wasting. And in my book the greatest waste of time is anger. Which is why, when I was leafing through a magazine that evening, I was so happy – relieved, delighted even – to read that many women felt less anger as they got older for this precise reason, at least according to Sally Stabb, professor of counselling psychology at Texas Woman’s University.
He was away that night, which meant I could do all the little things I could never do when he was around because they drove him crazy.
I went to bed early with a big cup of hot chocolate, which I drank noisily. I turned on the television to watch the news and then I put a cushion under the covers to prop up my feet, even though the lotion I had put on them had not quite dried yet. As I drifted towards sleep, still surrounded by the books and magazines and tissues that I would have been obliged to clear away had I been sharing the bed with him, I thought about my angry years and the long line of betrayals that had so undone me. And how it comforted me to recall the wicked perpetrators with such equanimity.
The Ex. I could wish even him well these days. The boss who had sacked me – I could, if I strained my imagination, almost see his side. The school friend who had not invited me to her Famous Ancestors birthday party because I didn’t have any – she’d been under terrible strain at home at the time. As was the boyfriend who had told me, after we’d had sex, that thanks to me he had transcended it.
What a relief it was to watch them parade through my head without feeling the slightest shudder of resentment. To know, that, in this sense at least, I was happy to be my age. Or so I told myself, as I went hurtling into one of the most disturbing dreams I can ever remember.Everyone was in it. Each time I turned a corner, there was another editor with his arms akimbo, telling me my writing was hormonal, and behind him would be a righteous neighbour standing with her arms akimbo, saying: “You know why your family is such a mess, don’t you? It’s because you work.”
What did all this signify? I asked myself the next morning. Could it be that nobody ever got over anything? No, I thought. There was no escape. Even if we buried them, our betrayals and humiliations and broken hearts lived on.
On my way to work the next day, I stopped off at a bookshop. Later I did some research on the internet and made a few phone calls. After which I was able to confirm three things. The first was that women these days had a lot of anger, and with good reason. In the words of Mike Fisher, founder of the British Association of Anger Management, we were more independent and had to “cope with juggling the stress of home life, work and financial responsibilities”, so no wonder it got to us. The second thing was that all those who considered themselves experts on women and anger were of the view that women tended to bury it, because it was considered unfeminine. The third thing was that to bury anger was to turn that anger against oneself, thereby inviting depression, eating disorders, alcoholism and all the forms of substance abuse known to man.
Put the three things together and you had a dilemma. Or so it seemed, as I was chatting with a male colleague later that same day at lunch. I suppose I should explain that we had just come out of a meeting that had gone rather badly, in part because of the way I had handled a disagreement with another male colleague. It had been simmering for a long time, and when you’ve been biting your tongue for months, because you’ve been doing his job for him, only to see him take all the credit – what I am trying to say is that when you are that angry with someone, striving for a neutral tone is like hiking to Mount Everest Base Camp in the wrong shoes. Why I bothered, I do not know. Did anyone even hear me? No. The male colleague who took me out to coffee was kind enough to confirm that. “I’m afraid you’re right,” he said. “These things do tend to be gendered. There are certain situations in which a man can express anger and get respect.”
“And a woman?”
He smiled and shook his head. Between you and me, I felt like screaming. But I gritted my teeth – no, I’ll be honest here. I ground my teeth. There might well be people in the world who could relax by ironing their husbands’ shirts. There were others who found it more relaxing to go to the gym, get on the step machine and imagine that a whole series of heads, belonging to any number of people, including their husbands, were underneath. My own preference would have been swimming. But since he had the car, there was no way I could get to the pool and back by bus and also make it to the business appointment that was threatening to ruin my evening. So instead I went to visit my friend Laila, which turned out to be perfect, even though she was ironing, because she hadn’t spoken to her husband for four weeks. And quite right too. During a late-night argument he had called her a Muslim dwarf. “I don’t think I’ll ever forgive him,” she said.
Her friend Markie, who was leaning disconsolately on the kitchen table, said: “I don’t think you should.” She’d had a hard day, too. She’d been trying to close some sort of business deal, and her prospective partner had been extraordinarily rude to her. “It was because I’m a woman, you know. That’s why he thought he could get away with it. You wouldn’t catch him talking to the men that way!” She sighed and took a dangerously large swig from her wine glass. And then she was telling us about her last boyfriend, and the one before that. It was just terrible hearing what they had done to her, but (strangely) it was also relaxing.
So much so that when I went off to my appointment, I felt almost light-hearted. I could barely remember why I’d been dreading it. What was there to complain about? The woman I was meeting was about my age, and she had an excellent sense of humour. And when she mentioned that in a previous life she’d been a therapist, I brought up this anger thing. I shared my latest thoughts. Yes, women were brought up to bury their anger. Yes, this social habit exacted a heavy psychic price. Yes, it was still socially unacceptable for women to express anger. But there were ways around it. Just because you couldn’t express your anger directly and in public, that didn’t mean you couldn’t have a very good time expressing it behind closed doors. And what fun that was. And how dull life would be without those delicious jokes at men’s expense. She smiled.
In a judicious voice she told me that what I had just described was triangulation. This meant venting to a third party to ease the tension. “But it means you forgo the chance to use your anger adaptively, by which I mean using your anger to hold your ground, assert your values, and deepen your relationships through honest, open communication.”
Oh, no, I thought. Here we go. But at that very moment, a group came in. There were eight or nine of them, men and women in their mid-thirties, all wielding pints and wearing red shirts that said “Shagalluf” and cursing whatever team it was their own benighted team had just lost to. They settled in the sofas at the far end and began to play with some sort of mechanical toy. Clack clack clack. It was ear-splitting. After another judicious pause, my drinking partner stood up, walked over and explained to the clacking Shagalluf brigade that some people in the room were trying to have a serious conversation.
“That should do it!” she said brightly when she sat down again. She had not seen the hand signals that they’d given her behind her back.
But I had. So I glared at them. I glared at them again when they walked past us – single file – with their forefingers pressed against their lips, saying “Shhhhh”. We just ignored them, but then they did it a second time, and then a third. The idiots were making fun of us for standing up for ourselves. Was I really going to let this pass?
In my most forbidding voice, I said: “If you continue with this behaviour, I’m afraid I’m going to have to make a complaint.” He imitated my voice and his friends jeered. I don’t know what came over me. I gave them the finger.
“Now, that’s just not on,” said the ringleader. “No middle-aged woman is going to give me the finger and get away with it.”
“Oh, f*** off,” I said.
That really got me thinking. What I mean is, it got me thinking about where all this thinking about anger had got me. It seemed to me that the more I had thought about anger, the angrier I got. And the more I talked about it to other women, the angrier they got too. But how refreshed I felt after letting off a bit of steam. Well, maybe I let off more than a bit. But it was fun. Though my pleasure was somewhat diluted when I went down to the post office several days later to collect a package. It was a book. The Anger Advantage. From You Know Who. The business associate who understood her anger better than I did mine.
“I hope this helps,” said the inscription.
Chastened, I made myself a cup of camomile tea. Okay, I thought, as I leafed through its earnest introduction. I could, if I wished, pull this book to pieces. But it was grounded in the best research and full of information that might just help me, focusing as it did on the special problems women had with anger on account of society giving them no acceptable way to vent it. I would read it with an open mind, I decided. And how glad I am I did. Like all such books, it was speckled with multiple-choice quizzes designed to help you see which categories you fell into. To my appalled surprise, I fell into almost all of them. Like so many women, I sometimes diverted anger by internalising it, eventually making myself ill and depressed. Like so many other women, I sometimes externalised it. But all too often I contained it, saying nothing while waiting for it to blow over, and ultimately failing to stand up for myself or my beliefs.
Worst of all, I had gone through long stretches of my life segmenting my anger. In other words, disowning it to such a degree that I didn’t even know it was there, but still expressing it in veiled and insidious ways.
The thing to remember about anger, the authors reminded me, was that you couldn’t make it go away. Veiled or not, it always found some way to express itself. Now that really chilled me. So of course I was open to any suggestions about learning new ways to express anger honestly, respectfully, and responsibly, to use it as valuable information about where my boundaries were. But the more I read, the more my responsibilities weighed on me.
Especially when I got to the bit when they said that even when I had mastered all of the above, people would still have a hard time dealing with my anger, on account of not accepting anger in any form from a woman. The thing that really irked me was that I did care, deeply, about the troubled relationships in my life and sincerely wished to fix them. So I read on, dutifully addressing issues with my spouse, my family of origin, my children, my colleagues and my friends.
Unfortunately, they didn’t have a chapter on counsellors. So the day before our first appointment, I sat down to prepare. I would go in to this counsellor’s office with an open mind and a smile. I would look the woman in the eye and say: “How glad I am to be here. Even though – I’ll be honest – when I first received this second-hand invitation to come in and speak to you about my anger, well, frankly, I just didn’t know what to think.”
I’d pause, to let her take it in. But also to feel my anger. See its colours. Cherish its fire and its power. And then I’d go straight to the heart of it. I’d lean forward and say: “If you never allow yourself to feel angry – because women aren’t supposed to – and if you never allow yourself to express anger – because angry women don’t get respect – then you’re just going to be a doormat, aren’t you? You’re never going to have much fun. Never going to be much fun, either.” And then I’d turn to my other half and say, “And where would we be then, my love? You’d be dragging me in here to talk about how boring I am. You’ll never be content, will you? Not until I’m the whore and the Madonna all rolled into one.”
Oh, what fun I had, imagining the look on his face when I said that. There it would be, for all to see. And I was angry about it. Why shouldn’t I be? That would teach him. Teach her too. This counsellor woman would never dare to ask another woman to come in to talk about her anger, ever again.
But I had so much fun planning the showdown that by the time I actually walked into the room the next morning and set eyes on the counsellor – who did not in any way resemble the harridan I had been expecting – my script deserted me. I was forced back into my old ways. When she asked me about my anger, I said I felt none at all.
Maureen Freely
Controlled and conciliatory in everyday life, Lesley White gets her kicks from body combat
I have just chosen my Christmas present. It is soft and baby blue; it is generously padded and delicately stitched. My gift, a pair of beautiful leather boxing mitts, is my best chance for a thinner, fitter, braver New Year spent pummelling passive men (consensually, of course) whenever I get the chance. By nature I am a lazy exerciser. Health clubs depress me: the humming of the machinery and the smell of old sweat make me nauseous; but when I punch I am happy, lost to myself. I want to go on and on. Only fatigue stops me. If you added a sociopathic tendency and an injection of brute strength, I could be a very worrying woman. In life I am controlled. I’m conciliatory. And then I go to Body Combat.
I’m a weakling southpaw, but my jabs and crosses are improving, while my hooks still fade in mid-air and my upper cuts couldn’t cut a baby tooth. Monitoring my moves in the full-length mirrors as I strike out at nobody in particular to the strains of Eye of the Tiger, I suddenly notice myself and want to laugh.
My friend Kate, elfin and artistic, sends me a text on a Saturday morning: “Are you coming to kick some ass later?” When we are kept from our arena by injury (her: twisted ankle from high heels; me: worn-and-torn kneecap), we veer from panic to depression. Who will we fight this week? Our husbands shake with laughter at all this; when there is talk of a body-combat social, they imagine a bouncers’ pub crawl, drunkenness, swearing and fisticuffs on the streets.
Is what my husband calls my “Kill Men class” really an outlet for my own latent rage? It certainly taps into a darker instinct. In one sequence we have him (the putative enemy is always male) down on the floor and are punching into oblivion. In real life this would be bloody, brutal, brain-damaging violence, but this is make-believe, and it works.
Where does it come from, this well of aggression, this desire to overcome? I have never fought in the street. Road rage appals me. Why, then, do I love it?
It’s not just me. Even the most respected London boxing gyms have been filling with women. Now I have a trainer who struggles to motivate me on the bench press; after 10 minutes he says “Let’s box”, and fetches the mitts and pads. Suddenly the tired, resentful woman in front of him starts smiling. “What is it about women and boxing?” I ask, genuinely puzzled. At home I persuade my husband to hold the pads and coach me; our five-year-old son wanders into the room, bemused, seeing from the laughter that this hitting is a good game. I stop. Aren’t I always telling him that fighting is never the answer?
The pat theory is that women like me are expressing a sublimated anger at daily life. Actually, it’s men who aren’t allowed to be angry any more, with our hyper-vigilance about their domestic violence and anger management. The desire to hit comes from deeper within, somewhere atavistic, to do with survival. It is compounded by the thrill of taboo-breaking: our hands are for nurturing, for soothing, for revealing our age, not for giving bloody noses. Does throwing toy punches make me feel safer as I walk the mean streets? Would I raise even my voice to anyone who attempted to mug me? No, I’d hand over the phone, then offer the watch, the earrings, the cash, and then I’d cry. But a good box the next day would help me get over it.
When it comes to healthy rage, women have the upper hand, says AA Gill. Men go into sulks instead
Watching a stage production of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf, I was bathed in a small revelation. It wasn’t what the arguing couple were saying, but how they were saying it that mattered. There were times when they were lying and times when they were telling the truth, and sometimes they were pretending to lie when in fact they were telling the truth and vice versa. And even though I’d only come across these people on stage a few minutes before, and knew no more about them than the author had allowed me to see, I could, with absolute assurance, tell the difference between the truth and the lies, the demi-lies and the half-truths. The whole audience could tell. We could separate veracity from mendacity because they were having an argument. If they’d been quiet and rational and reasonable, it would have been impossible.
In the film The Lives of Others, an East German secret police interrogator points out the truth that innocent people get angry: it’s the guilty who remain calm, who never contradict themselves, whose alibis never falter. It’s not in the vino that the veritas lies; it’s in the anger the alcohol disinhibits.
And here is a sober truth: women are better at venting anger than we are. It’s a truth that’s not an observation from stage or screen, but from experience at
the parapet. The model of women as ideally demure, simpering creatures constantly searching for compromise, harmony and a quiet life was only ever true in dreadful Edwardian novels. Any man who’s ever had a mother, sister, girlfriend, wife, daughter or female co-worker — in fact anyone who’s lived outside a public school, a monastery or the Brigade of Guards — knows that women have rages like Wales has weather. They can start an argument faster than we can say “I’ll do it tomorrow”. If rows were gunfights, they are Annie Oakley and we’re all lying in Main Street with holes the size of doughnuts in our peace of mind.
How many men’s last words have been, “But darling, that’s so irrational”, as if the only things in the whole damn world that ought to be rational are traffic lights and women? We men talk about anger as if it were a bad thing, a failing thing, a loss of control and face. We talk about dealing with anger, anger management, channelling anger, avoiding anger altogether, and we’ve got it all wrong. The best thing you can do with anger is to be angry with it. It is part of our emotional palette — it grabs us for a reason. It’s not irrational. Like traffic lights, it’s a good way of attracting attention, and you ignore it at your peril. And I can’t do it. Like most men, I have real trouble being angry in public. I have it, I know what it feels like. But I’m not comfortable getting it out in front of people. So like most men I wrap it up, I transform it into something more palatable, something that’s easier to swallow, something altogether more manly. I sulk. Sulking is an almost exclusively male accomplishment. It comes garnished with a delicate grievance and a bruised dignity. Women get angry; men offer the vainglorious comeback of shouting “You’re not making any sense” before retreating to the garden shed of sulks. The problem is of course that, 20 minutes later, women are purged, cleansed, relieved, and have moved on. While three hours later, we’re still in the shed with our self-administered emotional indigestion, which over the years will give us ulcers, heart attacks, strokes and hangovers.
The unfair, infuriating truth is that women live longer, healthier, happier lives than us, with better digestions and orgasms, because they can fly into a healthy rage over the fact that they can’t read a map and we should have known they meant right when they said left, or because we said we liked their hair when it was the dress we were supposed to notice.
There's no shame in being an angry person, argues Ariel Leve. Anger is valuable, so why not embrace it?
There is a common misconception about anger. People, especially Brits, tend to think getting angry means losing one’s temper and shouting. I’ve always thought of that as communicating. Real anger is never that overt. Real anger — the deep, dark, seething rage that derails lives, poisons relationships — simmers beneath the surface.
It’s colourless, odourless and, like the toxic gas radon, undetectable.
It contaminates silently.
I’ve never had a problem expressing anger, providing it’s about something specific. If I can tell you why I’m angry, it’s not the kind of anger you should be worried about. The kind of anger to worry about has built up over the years, like plaque that can’t be scraped off. It plays out, over and over, in self-defeating ways. Like not being in healthy relationships. Or feeling I don’t deserve to be happy. There is an alchemy to this anger that makes it infinite. Often, it can’t be explained. It’s confusing and frustrating to the people who are on the receiving end, because I have insight as to why it’s there and yet am unable to change.
As I’ve grown older, I’ve become more aware of its roots. There are certain things I will never get over being angry about; the challenge is not to let the residue take over.
So it’s not that I’ve become angrier; it’s that the resentments have been there all along, gestating.
Many of my girlfriends feel a similar helplessness when it comes to their anger. They know it has increased, but these feelings get managed, not eliminated. It’s never about just one thing. It’s the cumulative effect of life being unfair.
Because life hasn’t delivered what they expected. Because they’ve been knocked down and let down, and each time that happens it’s harder to get up. But they do. So anger is an armour they wear to protect themselves from future wounds. Occasionally they become haters. They blame men for having crushed their spirit. But usually that’s a fleeting moment. Most don’t hate; they’re disappointed. They understand that to get by without being angry all the time, they’ve had to systematically lower their expectations.
Which might be the process of growing up. One by one, expectations get decimated, and when you’re sufficiently disillusioned and have come to terms with the fact that things don’t work out just because you want them to, when that process is complete, you’re an adult. Except we don’t quite accept it and continue to hold out hope.
One thing we have in common is that our anger is mainly directed within. For some there is drinking, or starving, or overeating, or taking drugs, or casual sex, or co-dependency — anything to numb the pain. Which is why, until the wound is explored and the anger is confronted, people who are driven to self-destruct won’t stray from that path. No job or man or amount of money will quell the anger. It is, as they say in Alcoholics Anonymous, “an inside job”.
So why should anger be something to be afraid of? If it’s not a catalyst for abusive behaviour — emotionally or physically — it can be constructive and useful.
Anger is a facet of who I am. It does not define me. I’ve never felt ashamed of being an angry person. I’ve embraced it, because anger is valuable. The angriest people I know are also the funniest. Anger focuses and spurs action; it fosters ambition. I don’t envy people who don’t get angry or feel anger — I’m incredulous. How is that possible? It’s one thing not to raise your voice or be rude, but not to feel angry — that’s an entire symphony of emotions locked away, not being played. I went out with someone once who said: “I was never an angry person until I met you.” I always took that as a compliment.
Men — and the law — bend over backwards for women, complains rod liddle, Yet still they’re angry
They do seem to be terribly angry these days, don’t they, women? I’ve always assumed it’s because of something we’ve done, we men. But that’s a sexist and solipsistic response which only makes them all the angrier. “How dare you try to appropriate my anger! It’s mine. It has nothing to do with you,” they say, but you know they’re lying somehow. And through experience
I find it’s no use putting your arm around their shoulder and saying in a calm and affectionate tone: “Come on, little Miss Crosspatch, don’t get yourself in a tizzy.” Inexplicably, that only makes things worse, I find. My girlfriend gets angry quite a lot at a whole bunch of diffuse stuff, but always claims its hormone-related. Premenstrual, menstrual or post-menstrual fury.
There’s a window of about five days in the month when she acts like a normal person, smiles, says please and thank you, doesn’t wander around with the bread knife held aloft. For the rest of the time you just tiptoe around her with a haunted expression. I know it’s something I’ve done, or not done. Or something we’ve done, we men.
There was a woman I used to work with at the BBC who used to get incredibly angry, pretty much every day. But the lucky thing was you knew when the rage was about to pour forth, because she would start to smell weird. A sort of rich, yeasty tang, like a loaf of rye bread being made in Hell’s Bakery. At which point we’d all edge away, head for the toilets or the canteen or the pub, or just repeat to ourselves over and over again: duck and cover, duck and cover.
If you were a reactionary — and I’m not saying you are — you might put it down to an existential angst occasioned by the fact that women do not quite know what they are here for. Three decades of progressive legislation have meant that 70% of women now work for a living, and not only as nurses, whores or air hostesses. Their penetration of the job market has been absolute; discriminate against a woman on account of her gender — or even, some argue, because she is simply absolutely f***ing useless —and she will have tribunals and lawyers lined up to sue your ass off, as the Americans put it. They have the law — and the zeitgeist — on their side. When they decide to have a child, they will be given full-paid leave for the duration of their pregnancy, or the first nine months afterwards, whatever they so choose. Men get two weeks if they’re lucky. There is no longer even the vaguest glimmering of discrimination against women in the job market (quite the reverse, in fact), yet they still do not, on the whole, make it to the boardrooms. The various quangos devoted to improving the lot of women insist it really is down to discrimination, against overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The real reason might be that when push comes to shove, insufficient numbers of women either wish to achieve high office or are capable of so doing.
One or the other.
Meanwhile, despite the fact that they are equal partners in the job market, it is nonetheless the case that in the family courts they still rule supreme: in a divorce case, the woman will end up with the lion’s share of the capital: a guaranteed income, the house, the kids, everything. Even if she worked for a living too. And yet women, having been given all of this, are still angry. You wonder if that is because they don’t really want it after all.You might argue all that if you were a reactionary, but I’m not a reactionary, so I’d like to dissociate myself from such a misogynistic point of view.
And also because my girlfriend will be reading this. She reads the Style section first, then the Magazine. You all do that, don’t you, you ladies? We men read the news, then sport. We kid ourselves we’re all the same, men and women, but we’re not. I wonder if the anger has been occasioned by the pretence.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
No, Andrew, I haven't noticed that at all.
Shirley, London,
I was brought up in a family where anger was expressed in a healthy manner by my mother and where my father understood enough about her to simply let her get on with it, although he himself was prone to the male sulking - sadly without a shed to retire to for maximum impact.
Growing up in an environment where arguments were over in twenty minutes flat, and invariably ending with a "nice cup of tea" has meant that although I have been able to express my own anger in a similar way, I have often been accused of having a hot head by peers who grew up in less understanding atmospheres.
Surely rather than women having an increasing problem with anger those who vent are simply learning from their parents and other role models and their ability to cope with natural anger.
Felicity, Nottingham, England
I am a 33 year old female and coincidently was catching up on this article after completing another body combat class. Lesley White hit the nail on the head. In my job I cant just beat the c**p out of people who annoy me or abuse my boyfriend (I wouldn't dream of it) but for an hour I can unleash the angry red head that I can be. If I'm not angry I just vent and come back feeling more alive then ever with a big smile on my puffed out sweaty yet satisfied face. So much so I even dont mind doing the housework for a bit whilst I wind down (believe me a task indeed). I recognise that it is a bit of an addiction but lets face it its not one that will hurt anyone except my muscles . For the sake of all relationships it beats an arguement when you could end up saying to someone that you love something that you really didn't mean but had no outlet.
The article made me smile and will be put on my fridge to remind me that I'm not the only one. Thank you.
Georgina, Farnham, Surrey, England
Have you noticed that so often women will respond to a calm, reasoned contribution with vitriolic personal attack and invective, that doesn't begin attempt to address the logic, reasoning and far less the conclusion of your argument.
"Ten years you carry that pistol, and now you waste your shot."
Of course this is not confined to women. Just log on to the Samizdata sycophants if you want a slanging match.
Andrew Milner, Yokohama, Japan
I guess I'm just hopelessly out of it. I'm a woman, and I would never get angry for no reason all the time like that woman at the BBC; especially not at work. In my experience, that kind of behavior just isn't appropriate on the job - for men or for women. Maybe if you're in a position of authority it's different (was she?). But even then I doubt it would help either.
Also, I usually read the news and other sections first and then the style section.
Rosalind Lord, San Francisco, California, USA
What particularly fascinates is the necessity, seemingly shared by nearly all, to divide the human race into two strictly separate entities.
A woman is intrinsically feminine by virtue of her sex, just as a man is intrinsically masculine because he is a man - we are all "real" men and women, no matter how we, as individuals, choose to behave...
We are also all emotional beings and feel anger. Not all methods of expressing the anger are socially acceptable, but the feeling is universal - and gender irrelevant. Anything enabling both sexes to express the anger in non-destructive ways can only be positive, don't you think?
So why so much anger?
Sophie, London, UK
This article makes me angry. Probably because I'm a woman, but heck, I've already done a half hour on the elliptical, so I might as well wax irrational in the safe bounds of this comment box! Women have always been conditioned to be docile, demure, submissive. The only red a woman was allowed to see was the bashful blush on her English rose complexion. The legacy: women are often less assertive and less respected professionally (women make 30% less for the same job, make up 11% of corporate officers and 3% of top-earners); twice as many women than men suffer depression and 10 times as many eating disorders. All because of a constructed, and destructive, idea of femininity. The ST magazine is perpetuating a stereotype of the enraged irrational female, which harks to the pathologized hysterics of 18th century. The true question is not "what's fuelling that female fury?" but where is the female fury over the misogynism spread thick and heavy through this article.
Claire, London, UK
Men have self control? Oh, so that is why we don't need all those domestic violence orders then. It often seems to me that women who don't vent their anger end up using emotional manipulation instead. It's normal to vent a bit of anger every now and again and healthy.
Sally, UK,
Paul Francis, Brisbane. Your comments made me laugh, not angry. The idea that women are angry because we've turned men into women is ridiculous. What women want is a fair go, and the right to be independent if we so choose. I certainly don't feel the need to "protected and swept off my feet". A guy who behaved that way would make me angry as he would be ignoring my need to be independent! As for EK, Various, not all women have the choice to be mothers and/or work outside the home. The majority do both out of economic necessity, yet after working all day, still come home to the lion's share of domestic work and childcare. Studies in all western countries support this. No wonder such women are angry. I was one of them once. Now my kids are grown up, I have chosen to be single and bask in my new found independence. The anger has gone. I wonder why?
Clarissa, Melbourne, Australia
Just to add to the mix, I have a gay female friend who says she never gets angry. She is at the 'boyish 'end of the spectrum, has a more feminine 'wife', but is not monogamous. She can be somewhat dismissive of attempts to analyse relationship issues as a 'girl thing', and can ignore things she doesn't want to deal with, yet has tried therapy to help with difficulties with closeness. So is anger nature or nurture? Chromosomal sex shaded by sexual orientation? We're not easily compartmentalised.
lotte, london, uk
I particularly enjoyed Rod Liddle's uncompromisingly honest take on "a modern woman's anger" in his partner - having spent several years in comparable circumstances.
Modern women as these apparently affect to believe - in the absence of sensible challenge - that it is acceptable for women in general to exhibit an impacted, deranged fury to those sharing their daily world, that this has become some form of inalienable feminist birthright. Sensible challenge has been absent because men are programmed to crave sex - which modest truism modern woman often affects to despise -but have become cowed by three decades of feminist pc attack upon masculinity per se. The extremes of male hormonally driven behaviour are properly subject to societal censure and control: men behaving in this manner - and an untold many who don't - lose their homes, access to their children etc under ultimate pain of imprisonment. Unpleasant, damaging behaviour should be judged for what it is - regardless of gender
Tom Downey, Manchester, UK
Maureen Freely's contribution was overly long, with too much self-indulgent psychobabble taking itself far too seriously, and I gave up on it well before the end. At least Rod Liddle and AA Gill know how to make me laugh.
Gordon Alexander, Frome, UK
Just to add to the 'mix', I have a gay female friend who claims never to feel anger. She is at the 'boyish' end of the spectrum, has a more feminine 'wife', and is not monogamous. She ignores what she doesn't want to deal with, has tried therapy for difficulties with 'closeness', yet can comment that trying to understand/analyse relationship difficulties is 'a girl thing'. So is it nature or nurture? Chromosomal sex or sexual orientation?
Jill, london, uk
The problem with women is that they have such a huge chip on their shoulders, a massive inferiority complex, because they have been told by their feminazi spokeswomen since the 1960s to be more like men, to be better than men, to achieve more than men, even to become the new men. And because none of this is possible (women are just different), they have become frustrated and angry. The promises, they are beginning to realise, simply cannot be fulfilled. So what can they do? Slink away, back to the kitchen and the bedroom, or continually raise their voices ever louder? The shrillness of women nowadays is like an early warning signal for an impending attack. Drives me mad. Plus, they should start wearing skirts and dresses again, not trousers. If they looked a little more like women, then maybe men would respect them more. Instead, they appear frightening and ominous. Something to be avoided. And when they want free drinks on a Friday, only the skimpiest possible attire is quickly found!
Mike Mitchell, Spalding, England
The whole lot of you need to check in to The Priory, pay them thousands of pounds, then check out and wonder why you are such a fool with your money and everything else in life.
Scott, Bangkok, Thailand
Evolution has given women an instinct that they must keep men in a continuous state of unease. That way, they will keep hunting, working and producing more for the family. The ability to be angry effectively is one of the techniques for producing this unease, I suggest.
Frank Upton, Solihull,
Excellent articles, all of them (not sure about the last one.. how can any man justify to himself living - by choice! - with a woman who has five days of 'rational behaviour' once a month?!). I am passionate about all sorts of things and routinely rail at injustice and stupidity like many of us, male and female, but have little experience of the 'personal anger' which seems to be so prevalent in our generation. Since most of us are disappointed with life and many disgusted with the incompetence, dishonesty, cowardice, envy and lack of intellectual rigour in the world around us by the time we reach adulthood, why one persona can keep cool while another one 'blows' is a conundrum. The best I can think of is that our temperament , over which we have no influence .. influences our response thus fingering the greatest vehicle for injustice: genes.
Paola, Milan, Italy
Maureen Freely and Ariel Leve have expressed perfectly my own feelings about anger. I have spent my life repressing the desire to punch someone in the mouth. Occasionally I have failed. Rod Liddle's article is a perfect example of something that makes me furious - HOW patronising can he get?
elrohana, Leeds,
Check your facts Rod! - many employers don't offer full maternity - the legal minimum is 90% for the first six weeks followed £112.50 per week after that.
Simon, Newbury,
How tiresome to assume that all women, or men, are the same.
Georgina Kosanovic, Windsor, Canada
Oh Dear!
jennifer Jamieson, Edinburgh, Scotland U.K.
Definition of Anger: passion of the mind prompted by a sense of wrong.
Okay, let's use some female logic to solve the problem that is anger.
When someone acts in a way that we perceive as being wrong, our response can either be one borne of love or one of fear. Think about it: when we're happy and content, we're full of self esteem and our confidence is riding high; we can take on the world and win. However, when our anxieties and fears creep into a situation, stress builds. Anger is one of the reactions we use to combat stress.
Now, instead of using anger to combat stress, we can use it to work out the cause of our stress.
So yes, anger is a good thing: nature's way of telling us where to concentrate our efforts in order to rid ourselves of our fears and insecurities.
Women have a natural tendency towards unconditional love; we know it and we feel it. Ditch the fears and find the love - true passion; real power.
Pat Fletcher, Nottingham,
just what the world needs.....more angry women
lucas jackson, lansing, michigan,
You are angry because you have made your men into women. So you don't have a real man any more. No-one to reassure you. No-one to protect you. No-one to sweep you off your feet.
Paul Francis, Brisbane, Australia
I suspect Rod Liddle's girlfriend gets angry quite a lot for a very good reason.
Oonagh, Hong Kong,
You know what makes me angry? Rod Liddle. I would like to brighten his day, and change his views on women a tad. I wear make up every day, do my hair nice, stay on top of fashion ... but i study physics. i'm aiming to be an engineer or research scientist. I also read the In Gear section FIRST, then News Review, then the news, THEN STYLE. No, "we" do not all read Style first. I read the magazine last, if i'm very bored, which tonight i was.
Tuija, York, UK
Frankly, I'm a little sick of hearing about what is upsetting women this week; we hear about it so much that most of us are desensitised to it.
I am not at all surprised to learn that angry women is okay, but angry men is not. The fundamental difference (as expressed elsewhere) is that men have a degree of self control and aren't so ready to be slaves t their hormones.
If you can't handle the stress of a career and a family, don't try to have your cake and eat it. Do something about your life but quit complaining either way. And if you're finding that people are being rude to you that may be a good indicator that you're annoying them as well as me.
Please, keep self indulgent socialist garbage out of this paper and if the authors really feel that what they have to say is important enough for an outlet, invite them to go write for the Guardian. I object to paying for an otherwise excellent newspaper in which space that could have been used for something interesting has been wasted.
EK, Various, Greece, Italy, U.S
Certainly there are differences in the way men and women are socialized to deal with anger, but I think that the way this article handles these differences is a little extreme. There are people who suffer from hormonal mood swings, but is this really representative of all women? I think not. Most of the people I know, male or female, each experience and deal with anger in a different way, and attribute how they do this to early family life rather than biological causes.
Personally, as a woman, I find that the best way to express my anger is to remain calm and choose my words wisely. There is nothing more satisfying than to see one's opponent resort to yelling and insults in the face of a wickedly logical and politely stated argument.
That said, boxing does sound like a lot of fun.
Jessica, Gainesville, FL
Men have self control. Which is necessary, because when we get really angry and hit people things can get badly out of hand. Self control takes strength of character.
Women, on the other hand hardly ever feel the need to exercise self control. So naturally they appear to lack strength of character. And consistency. And rationality. And logic. Which is why we do not see them as equals.
So scream away girls. But don't be surprised if it doesn't get you far amongst men.
Redcliffe, London,
I was on the tube, going home after the obligatory Christmas Panto; when a couple got on and like myelf , had to stand. They , at first impression, were attractive, well groomed and dressed. As seats came available I was facing both of them. Both 40ish, she, not too much make-up, hair dutifully straightened in the must have fashion . He, a suspicious golden brown and the best highlights I've ever seen, an ashy blonde, manicured nails (yes) and possessing the same number of shopping bags as she. I observed their silent communication, they were definitely a couple; but so strangely devoid of a concrete sexuality, more of an X with X as oppossed to X with Y.
I see this sort of coupling more and more . The men that walk up the high street on a Sunday wearing the Baby Bjorn, wifey talking on the mobile , Daddy's in the park telling their son's to not be so aggressive. We have turned our men into our best friend, (girl , that is) . Where's the man to tear off our bodice?
Anger...??!
Kellan Steck-Refoy, London, United Kingdom
God she went on forever. Just get to the point. It is like reading Oscar Wilde only more droning if that is at all possible.
Sam, Upwestshireton,
Thus is exposed the myth of the « weaker sex », to whom we attribute such adjectives as affectionate, compromising, delicate, emotional, fragile, gentle, generous, kind, loving, passive, sensitive, sacrificing, submissive, tender, vulnerable, ... «dominated » and « nice ».
When, if all that were so, then surely now that women are « free » and « liberated » and « independent » ; quite happily and with relish abandoning the masquerade of playing a rôle, society would reflect such « ladylike », « feminine », « weak » characteristics.
And thus be a « better » place.
Sadly that is far from the case.
For society has never been so individualistic, so narcissistic, so aggressive, so competitive, so capricious, so ephemeral, so mercurial, so violent ...
And so destructive.
For women, alienated from the feminine, are behaving like pseudo-men.
Euthenics is something that dreams are made of.
As are empathy, compassion, altruism, creativity, intelligence, humanism, sacrifice, spirituality and lov
Jeffrey Moore, Toulouse, France