The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday

Five years ago, suggesting that a ban on smoking in enclosed public spaces could successfully be implemented across Britain with barely a squeak of protest would have sounded fanciful at least. But the ban’s easy passage and its positive early results – such as a 20 per cent fall in heart attacks in Scotland in the ten months since it came into force there – have stirred health campaigners and legislators across the nation. There are so many other dangerous practices that can be curbed, or controlled or deleted from existence. Life, they say, could be made so much safer and healthier with a few more rules.
Not everyone is convinced. Libertarians are ready to defend our right to risk our wellbeing through daft, dangerous, ill-considered or enjoyable activities. They point to the original health Nazi as a salutary lesson: Adolf Hitler never drank alcohol, never smoked and never allowed anyone to smoke in his presence. One of his party slogans instructed the German people: “Your body belongs to the nation! Your body belongs to the Führer! You have the duty to be healthy!”
It’s a safe bet, though, that more new health laws are on the way. The European Union is expected, for example, to act on new research implicating food additives in children’s behavioural disorders. Local authorities and employers have been quietly issuing health-related verbotens, too. And while we’ve been banning smoking, the rest of the world has been implementing a whole range of curbs for us to copy.
To see what’s in store, I’ve switched on the Body&Soul horizon-scanning radar to detect the top ten bans heading our way.
ROADSIDE MEMORIALS
Safety fears have led a growing number of local authorities to clamp down on roadside shrines.
The councils claim that they are acting on advice from police who fear that the tributes could endanger those placing them and distract motorists. Lincolnshire County Council “discourages floral tributes for health and safety reasons” and removes them if left for weeks. Bob Clarke, an East Sussex councillor, says that unauthorised memorials are now taken away.
Already banned in most American states.
JUNK FOOD ADVERTISING
Last April, research linking junk food advertising to teenage obesity led Ofcom, which regulates broadcasters, to outlaw all TV and radio adverts that promote sugary, salty or fatty foods and are targeted at children under 9. At the end of this year the rule will extend to 15-year-olds.
However, the British Heart Foundation (BHF) says that the regulations do not go far enough. It wants marketing of junk food products to children banned completely.
Ian Fannon, of the BHF, says that the foundation is lobbying for Ofcom to introduce a 9pm watershed for junk food TV adverts: “I think there is a good chance that we will succeed. We think we will achieve a total ban incrementally.”
However, an editorial in the advertising industry trade journal Campaign complains that the new Ofcom rules are already a step too far and have starved television of £30 million worth of revenue.
Meanwhile, many snack brands are evading the broadcasting ban by moving their advertising to the internet. Ofcom does not control internet advertising and neither, in effect, does the Advertising Standards Authority. A loophole in its code means that a brand’s own site is considered “editorial” content rather than advertising and is therefore free of any restrictions on targeting children.
This has enabled sites belonging to brands such as Haribo, Magic Kinder and Wrigley Hubba Bubba to feature games and cartoons targeted at children. Skittles, which are made by the confectionery giant Mars, has a profile on the social networking site Bebo. McDonald’s is also targeting children on the internet. It features a Kids Zone on its website, which lets children play games featuring the company’s clown mascot, Ronald McDonald.
Already banned nowhere.
FOOD ADDITIVES AND COLOURINGS
The clamour for a ban on many artificial colours and flavourings has grown louder in response to research in September suggesting that many colours may, in certain combinations, cause hyperactivity in children. Although a ban remains some way off, the Food Standards Agency, which commissioned the Southampton University study, revised its advice to parents of hyperactive kids, suggesting that they try cutting certain artificial colours from their diets. The colours are: sunset yellow (E110), quinoline yellow (E104), carmoisine (E122), allura red (E129), tartrazine (E102) ponceau 4R (E124), and sodium benzoate (E211).
The Southampton study suggests that consuming certain mixtures of these food colours together with the preservative sodium benzoate could be linked to a “negative effect on children’s behaviour”.
Dr Andrew Wadge, the FSA’s chief scientist, says the decision to ban problem additives is down to the European Food Safety Authority, which is reviewing all food colours used in the EU.
Already banned in some European countries that have acted unilaterally. Ponceau 4R and carmoisine are banned in Norway, Sweden, Japan and the US.
TEENAGE TANNING
People under 18 are to be banned from using tanning machines in Scotland, under legislation proposed by Ken Macintosh, a Member of the Scottish Parliament. The new Scottish administration has agreed to adopt the ban as part of the public heath Bill published this month. There will also be a ban on coin-operated, unsupervised sunbeds and health warnings on all machines. “These will be much like the health warnings on cigarette packets,” says Macintosh, “So it’s about raising the awareness of the dangers, as well as stopping use by young people.”
An estimated 100 people die in Scotland each year of skin cancers caused by the use of sunbeds. Macintosh hopes that the ban, which is “emphatically supported” by the British Medical Association in Scotland, will become law early next year. How long before it heads south?
Already banned in Australia, where a law passed in 2002 bars under15s from solariums unless they have parental consent. California barred under14s from tanning in 2004 and is debating raising the limit to 18.
MULTIPLE DOG-WALKING
Wandsworth Council, southwest London, has identified a vicious new threat to our wellbeing in the shape of professional dog-walkers parading packs of pooches belonging to owners who are too busy to exercise their pets. Big packs, on or off the leash, are banned for fear of fights and bites. Walking more than eight dogs is illegal in Wandsworth, and if you walk more than four mutts, you will need a special licence. A four-dogs maximum has been introduced in London’s royal parks, including Hyde Park, Green Park and St James’s Park.
Already banned in Raleigh, North Carolina, which bars town dwellers from owning more than two dogs.
TRANS FATS
Trans fats (or hydrogenated fats) have often been used in fried foods, snacks and baked goods to extend their shelf life, but since highly publicised research revealed that they are about ten times worse for heart health than unsaturated fats, many manufacturers have removed them from their branded products.
The Health Secretary Alan Johnson said this month that trans fats could be banned under forthcoming regulations. But Oliver Tickell, a health campaigner who has spent the past three years running tfX, the UK campaign against trans fats in food, says that recent voluntary restrictions by bulk industrial suppliers of vegetable oil may have effectively banished the fats from most British plates.
He reports how the suppliers told a meeting at the Food Standards Agency this week that there may be only 26 “problem” foods left being sold in the UK, down from 6,000 a year ago. By next year, Britain may be entirely trans-fat free, the suppliers claim.
British MEPs such as Linda McAvan (Yorkshire and the Humber) have lobbied for the fats to be banned outright, though any action by the European Parliament may now be left lagging behind the suppliers’ self-imposed ban.
A number of MEPs have signed a declaration in the European Parliament merely calling for clear labelling on any foods that may contain the fats.
Already banned in Denmark, where any food containing more than 2 per cent trans fats is outlawed.
COATS, CHOIRS, FLOWERS, SHOES AND MOBILE PHONES
Doctors’ white coats are to be banned from hospital wards after January, the Health Secretary Alan Johnson has announced. The garments, along with neckties, jewellery and watches, fake nails and long sleeves, have fallen victim to concerns about drug-resistant “superbugs” such as MRSA and C. difficile. But Johnson’s ban is only the latest in a trend to forbid potentially contagious items from wards.
Choristers, for example: last December, Torbay Hospital barred the Torbay Gospelaires male voice choir from entering wards to sing jolly Christmas carols. After 40 years of carolling to patients, the choir has been told that it can sing in public areas, but can’t cross ward thresholds to cheer the bedridden.
Flowers, meanwhile, are increasingly being banned from hospital wards across the land.
Again, this is over fears that they can spread infections such as MRSA and Staphylococcus aureus. Managers say that bugs can develop in vase water.
Then there are trendy Crocs shoes, which have reportedly been banished from the feet of nurses by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust, because of health and safety fears. Doctors’ mobile phones and pagers may also be for the chop. A recent study in the Journal of Hospital Infection found that more than 80 per cent of mobiles and 70 per cent of pagers had keypads that were contaminated with the bacteria.
Already banned in Sweden, where hospitals forbid Croc-wearing, claiming that the shoes create static electricity, which interferes with medical equipment.
ALCOHOL ADVERTISING
No more “Follow the bear”? The Royal College of Physicians is joining a phalanx of campaigning groups, including Alcohol Concern, to create the Alcohol Health Alliance to campaign for an immediate 9pm watershed on television alcohol advertising. But Professor Ian Gilmore, the college’s president, says the ultimate goal is a complete ban on TV booze ads.
Professor Gilmore began his campaign this year, after figures revealed that deaths from drink have doubled in 15 years. “I find it bizarre that, amid an epidemic of alcohol-related harm, we are still advertising it at times when children can be influenced,” he says. “Alcoholic beverages are advertised in cinemas when films with a 12 certificate are being shown.”
The Alcohol Health Alliance aims to lobby parliamentary groups to introduce advertising bans, and already the Liberal Democrat MP Sandra Gidley has introduced a Private Members’ Bill calling for laws to regulate price promotions on alcoholic products and to ban drinks advertising on TV before the 9pm watershed.
Already banned in France, where TV advertising of alcohol, and sponsorship of companies for advertising purposes by alcohol brands, is forbidden. In Lithuania, advertising alcohol is illegal between 6am and 11pm.
LUNCHTIME DRINKING
A survey by the law firm Browne Jacobson claims that 57 per cent of businesses ban drinking altogether during working hours, including lunchtime. The figure was 40 per cent ten years ago. Brighton and Hove City Council introduced a complete drinking ban on its 8,000 employees during working hours in 2005. The Welsh Assembly is planning a lunchtime booze ban for its 5,500 staff. The ban won’t apply to assembly members, though.
Already banned at the headquarters of the giant Belgian brewer InBev.
COFFIN-CARRYING
Family pallbearing is on the endangered list. In June, Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council banned mourners from carrying the coffins “to the grave, as well as the lowering of the coffin into the grave”. It says the job should be left to the professionals. The council’s officers instigated the ban after a number of “near misses” and says it is only fulfilling its duties under the Health and Safety at Work Act.
Already banned in Ireland. Fingal County Council, which runs 32 cemeteries in North Dublin, banished pallbearing amateurs after a number of people sued the local authority over graveside accidents.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This winds me up so much - when did the idea of self responsibility die?
All these potential laws cost me money - while they make my life unbearable - when do I get a say?
Isn't it about time we started thinking about creating a universal disclaimer to be used by anyone who thinks these are stupid laws? A risk assessment of smoking in an empty office should allow the self employed to smoke in their own company. It would also keep the papershufflers happy!
the same could be done for all the other stupid examples of H&S which the UK is now suffering.
Does this sounds sensible?
F0ul, deeside, UK,
Shouldering coffins is not banned in Ireland. Carrying a loved one to the place of final repose is a tradition as old as dying itself. Next time you see the funeral of a murder victim, high profile person or celebrity televised from Dublin, you will notice the continuance of that tradition, though the Council may well have issued a piece of paper banning it.
Liam, Sarajevo, Bosnia
A comment to Bryan: "freedom ends where other people's freedom begins" - so, if your freedom harms others, and you repeatedly ignore this, something has to be done!
Of course everything should have an ideal equilibrium and there is always the danger of "witch hunts" and other fundamentalisms.
We Portuguese have a saying, I don't know if you have something similar :"the way to Hell is paved with good intentions" ....
Raquel Seabra, Lisbon, Portugal
The Conservative government of Sweden also pursues this unholy path of trendy bans. It seems to be an all too human weakness to exert power over fellow human beings.
Sigge of Sweden.
sigge bock, krylbo, sweden
Why the hell would you need a sunbed if you live in bloody Australia?
That aside, I fully support the smoking ban and when I last checked I was not a card carrying Marxist. I quite like the idea that kids don't have junk food or booze promoted to death in front of them (please bear in mind the growth of the power of the media over the last few decades; it completely nullifies the 'never did me any harm' argument.) and you cannot...I mean you CANNOT... moan about our disprespectful, yobbish, out-of-control chav youth one minute and, in the next breath, argue that banning the mind-altering chemical additives in the fizzy drinks and crap food they have been raised on is somehow "another example of the nanny state".
chris, Worthing, England
Hard to find anything objectionable about banning any of them, frankly.
Rotwatcher, CHELTENHAM,
I completely agree with most of these bans. Most of them are to prevent unscrupulous behaviour by corporations - who will always go for the profit margin at the expense of the consumers well being. The others are just common sense (which is something that HAS to be legislated for since the average punter doesn't have any!). Does anyone in their right mind think that it's ok to advertise alcohol and junk food to children? My only complaint is the lack of "teeth" in the laws which are meant to enforce these rules. Dropping litter has long been illegal but, do you ever see anyone prosecuted for it? Bring on the nanny state - at least we might get some civil behaviour out of it's citizens!
James, Nottingham,
Interesting - but when you have a socialist government overburdened with hundreds of thousands of gerrymandered Labour supporters, given jobs in exchange for votes, the only thing practical for them to do is to start enforcing party doctrine and turn political idealism into reality - hence the massive growth of the nanny state and all the resident evil it drags along with it - welcome to the brave new world of the Marxist public service and a dose of en masse social engineering - after all freedom of thought, liberty in decision making and the human desire to break from the sheep mentality are the sworn enemies of socialism and its spiteful tentacles
Bryan, Totland Bay, UK
Ban lying down.
Studies show that almost 100% of dead people are found lying down. It is a national disgrace. The Government should ban lying down at once, or at the very least increse taxes on lying down.
Paddy, borehamwood,
It's only lunchtime drinking that I care about. It's unacceptable to do it here anyway, but I still like to think it's possible.......
Wan, Berks,
Here are a couple of things to ban:
1 Political correctness
2 Automated telephone helplines
3 Bureaucrats
Stephen, St. Ives, England
I think too much time and taxpayers money is being wasted by Politicians telling us what we already know, we should bin half the Politicians and their wasteful use of public funds and put that money into education, health, police and prisons. The entire UK is in chaos but the Goverment is more interested in telling me not to eat orange Smarties while having a sunbed session.
Iain, Glasgow, Scotland
Please do not keep repeating the claims of the Scottish heart attack study. In scientific terms it does not exist. It has not been publlshed. If you email the authors and ask for a copy, you will not get one. This is one of a series of similar studies. They started in the USA (all now discredited), we got one from Ireland which received a lot of press (never yet been published to my knowledge) and now the Scottish study. They are not part of science. As Tim Clarke above says, read Michael Siegel's blog.
I would be tempted to use junk science to get mobile phones and ipods banned on trains. Can anybody come up with a plausible story?
Jonathan Bagley, manchester,
The European bureaucrats' paradise - where everything that's not illegal is compulsory.
Alec in France, Aude, France
It's not the government's job to ban things such as these. No wonder taxes and cost of living in the UK are so high. Someone has to pay for this pointless legislation and the machine which perpetuates it. Personal responsibility is the order of the day. The growth of the state into things which do not concern them is part of the reason I am expat for good. Goodbye Smothering Britain
Dave, Coimbra, Portugal
Re The smoking ban.
most smokers have now either stopped going to the pub or vastly curtailed their visits. Smoke in a well ventillated public building has never been unacceptable to most people. Why not bring in some sense and compassion and allow building owners the choice provided that building regs are updated to include heat recovery extraction fans, which are readily available and reasonably priced. i will only vote for a party that advocates removing this Stalinist , Cultural Marxist piece of legislation. So sorry despite call me Dave's impressive efforts . thanks but no thanks. A lifelong Conservative voter.
Mick Parkhill, boston, lincs
The social busy-bodies just never quit deciding what's good for the rest of us. If only I could think and be responsible for myself!!
Scott, Durham, NC, USA
Can we please ban people from being common and vulgar in a built-up area?
Dougal, London,
I think we should have a total ban on people banning things!
Chris Goodman, Portsmouth, England
Heart attack admission rates had already declined by 14% in the 3 months prior to the Scottish smoking ban (as identified by American public health doctor Michael Siegel) Moreover, this study has not been peer reviewed (and probably never will be) thus we cannot assess its reliability.
See Michael Siegel at tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com for more analysis of bogus heart attack studies.
I've a couple more things to suggest on the ban list.
1) iPods. They interfere with pacemakers, apparently.
2) Printers. According to an Australian study, the humble office printer has as detrimental an affect on lungs as passive smoking.
Then we may as well just go the whole hog and ban public places.
Tim Clarke, Wigan, England
I don't understand the one about coffin carrying? Is the person being carried in danger of having a fatal accident?
Tom Moncrieff, London, England
"a 20 per cent fall in heart attacks in Scotland in the ten months since it came into force there".... What a ridiculous piece of so called research that was.
If the Scottish indoor smoking ban were to have any effect upon heart attack statistics, it could not possibly be measurable for at least 10 years after the event.
It is in the same class of fantasy 'research' that included the gem that passive smoking was 5x more dangerous than smoking yourself - Therefore the obvious preventative advice is to take up smoking, it is safer !!!!
BP Vallance, LEFKIMMI, Greece
I can't see anything wrong with any of these responsible types of regulation. I am 72 yrs old and one thing I have learnt in life is that most people do not have much common sense. With a choice between doing something sensible and something stupid they will usually choose the latter. It also seems that stupid choices have increased exponentially since I was young.
Churchill was a great inspiration to us in WW2 but it has been revealed that he was often under the influence in meetings, also a menace with some of his strange plans and of course he was a heavy smoker of cigars.
Hitler, it has been claimed by medical historians was addicted to speed (amphetamines) and also quack medicines, He was probably impotent except when he orgasmed in his speeches.
His colleague Goering was obese and many of the hierarchy
were not as pure as they forced everybody else to be.
You should not not comparing responsible government
with totalitarianism.
arthur, turku, finland
I just stubbed my toe on my sofa - can we organise a ban of soft furnishings please?
I mean, it might seem disproportionate to the risk posed, but that doesn't seem to stop everything else being banned in our free society.
J. Wilkes, Gloucester,
None of the above sounds unreasonable to me. I don't think I like the nanny state, but life would be much more tolerable without the neighbours yapping mutts and hyperactive kids. And how often have I pondered the invention of a device which stops phones ringing and walkmans playing on public transport?
Its been socially unacceptable to drink at lunchtime for a long number of years, even here in Caledonia.
Can we ban children from dropping litter? Can we ban sounding of horns in anger? Can we force cab drivers to use their indicator lamps?
Sounds like heaven this banning of everything.
David B, LARKHALL, UK
I'm a member of the Dangerous Party for Adults -- and I say we're old enough to make these decisions for ourselves.
Marc Sidwell, London,
Why the ordinary hell have most of these things been allowed in the first place anyway?
eugene, heidelberg, germany
Roadside advertising is already banned in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, as reported in the Economist a couple of weeks ago
anna, melbourne, aus
Australia has now banned tanning without parental consent for the under 18s, after the death from skin cancer of a 26 year old last month.
anna, melbourne, aus