David Budworth
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

CITY experts are preparing for a rally of up to 15% in the FTSE 100 before the end of the year as signals suggest the credit crisis has created the best buying opportunity for UK shares since the 2003 “Baghdad bounce”.
It is nearly five years since the index of Britain’s leading shares reached rock-bottom as troops prepared to invade Iraq, following the savage bear market sparked by the dotcom bust. The index hit 3,287 on March 12, 2003, sparking a rally that saw it jump 29% in the following six months and soar 105% before the credit crunch derailed the markets in June last year.
A growing number of commentators argue there are parallels which indicate the FTSE 100 is poised for a similar bounce in the second half of this year, with big implications for investors with money to spare for this year’s Isa allowance.
Many ordinary investors have been nervous about committing money to the markets with the index down 15% since the start of the year. It fell 137 points last week on fears that another big US bank could follow Bear Stearns to the brink of collapse. Some global markets have suffered even more – China, a favourite among investors – is down 28%.
However, if the professionals are right, investors should be investing their cash while they still can: the deadline to invest is just two weeks away on April 5.
The bulls point to signals which suggest shares are the best value since the 2003 market low. Last week the dividend yield on the FTSE 100 jumped to 4.14% as prices crashed, while the yield on five-year government bonds, or gilts, dipped to 3.97%.
The only other times the dividend yield has exceeded the five-year gilt yield in the past 50 years was in March 2003 and February 1958, when the market doubled in the following 12 months.
Graham Secker at investment bank Morgan Stanley said: “The 10-year gilt yield [4.3%] hasn’t slumped below the dividend yield yet, as it did in 2003, so the buy signal isn’t quite as powerful, but it’s getting there.”
Another measure of share-price value is the price/earnings ratio, with markets looking even cheaper than five years ago. The FTSE 100 is trading on a p/e of 11 times, compared with 26 before the dotcom crash. In 2003 the p/e of the market was about 14 compared with a long-term average of 15.
Analysts also pay close attention to the amount of cash in fund managers’ portfolios when trying to pinpoint the bottom of the market. This is also sending off an even stronger signal than 2003: fund managers are keener on cash than at any time since the 1998 LTCM hedge-fund crisis which preceded the dotcom boom.
Last month, fund managers had 4.9% of their portfolios in cash, compared with 4.7% the previous month, according to Merrill Lynch, another investment bank. A rise in cash balances can signal a rally, as it means there is money on the sidelines ready to be invested as sentiment turns.
A survey of Footsie forecasts by The Sunday Times last December revealed experts expected the market to end this year at around 6,500. Several have now cut their forecasts. UBS has dropped its end-of-year prediction from 7,200 to 6,500 and Legal & General has gone from 6,500 to 6,000. However, our panel still expects the market to reach 6,325 by the year-end.
That would be below the Footsie’s level of 6,477 at the start of the year, making this the worst 12 months for investors since the bear market of 2002. However, it is a 15% jump from where we are now – so there are opportunities as the end of the Isa season nears.
Few are willing to bet there won’t be more turmoil in the next few months. By March 2003 global shares had been in a bear market for three years, so many of the problems that had hit shares had worked themselves out. Today’s credit crunch is only nine months old so there could be more bad news to come.
Karen Olney at Merrill Lynch said: “Markets are likely to suffer until investors are convinced the credit crisis won’t bring something uglier than a 1990s-like recession.”
However, many commentators think the market will only fall a few hundred points more at most. It is already down 1,237 points since the credit crisis struck in June. While the markets are still on edge, most advisers recommend investors take a safety-first approach when investing their Isa.
Michelle McKenzie, 23, from Knightsbridge, London, a freelance marketing consultant, doesn’t want to miss out on a market bounce but is still nervous so has invested her £7,000 Isa allowance in a range of lower-risk funds recommended by adviser Best-invest. These include Blackrock UK Absolute Alpha and F&C Blue funds. Blackrock’s fund is up 13% over the past year and F&C’s is up 3%, against a 12% fall in the FTSE 100.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
What with the the greedy city yobs and the greedy tax free expense feeding MPs, the question is how to escape.........
Poly, South London,
I agree with the others on these comments - I've sold my portfolio of shares recently and bagged healthy profits. I'll be in cash for a good year or two to come and time will prove this article to be very foolish!
Andy Banks, Bristol, UK
Well over half of the fund managers can't even beat the market index. Take off their cut as well, and you are even more worse off. Cash deposits or, if you must, put the money directly in the index.
It is pretty obvious where money in our pension funds, share funds goes; straight into the pockets of the managers and banks. Just look at the bonuses, cars, property these guys can afford.
How much of the massive volume of shares traded on the stock markets daily is only traded because it generates commission for the financial institutions?
Bob Travels, Stevenage,
This article is nonsense.
The best way to make money is not to invest in funds, but buy the shares yourself and stop pouring management fees down the throats of the whole fund manager / financial advisor circus. I have invested in ISAs for the past 5 years and made virtually the same as I would have done if I have just put the money in a fixed interest bank account, despite taking all the risk.
That 1.5% fee per year starts to add up - the best advice the Times could give is "Don't invest in any fund which has an upfront non-performance related management fee."
James, London, England
You are stark raving mad. Liquidity issues could soon cause the biggest stockmarket crash since 1929. I sold my shares having done ok for ten years. Cash, gold and silver have been great and I am sticking with that strategy at least until corporate bond and sales declines have been fully realised. You can take a punt on emerging markets but they are already in bubble territory. If you are going to buy stocks buy them yourself - fund managers have no more chance of picking a good stock than a monkey with dartboard and a copy of the FT.
Mark, Epping, Essex
Hmmm, I've invested in PEPs and equity ISAs since 1997. My rough calculation is that I've made <4% per year compounded on it. That is worse than if I'd dumped the money in a cash ISA
John Lilburne, London,
As the UK enters a recession on the scale of 1991 this article encourages people to enter the stock market. Hmm. A cash ISA, pay down any debt then anything else into the bank would be the most sensible advice for the vast majority of people. Paying some twerp 1% a year to track an index is nuts and most savvy investors know this. Same with pension. Go SIPP and save the 1% managament fee for 30 years which will give you a heck of a return improvement in itself.
Arnold Jones, Gloucester, Uk
Even a rookie can make money out of buying shares but he or she has to be young (under 30) so that time is on their side and have a sizeable lump of cash that is not required for more immediate purposes.
john, milton keynes,
Any chance those expressing positive market opinions work for companies marketing ISAs?
racqueteer, Portsmouth, UK
"Seeing what unbribed they'll do".......
Here we go again, pushing investment funds rather than direct shareholdings. If we all held our portfolios directly, the boil of systemic corruption in the City could be lanced.
Nobody shorts my shares. The remuneration of managers does not get my approval. No fund manager makes a living out looking after my savings. Nor can a fund manager use my vote corruptly to support greed at the top with that old lie "the rate for the job" which by implication sustains his own salary.
tony peterson, kendal,