Philip Webster, Political Editor and Amanda Andrews
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Savers in banks and building societies will have the first £35,000 of their deposits 100 per cent guaranteed from today under reforms to prevent a repeat of the Northern Rock affair.
Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, will announce that the change, which comes into effect immediately, is a prelude to a complete overhaul of the compensation system to be included in legislation in the next session of Parliament.
Mr Darling said last week that he was looking at giving Britain a US-style system of savings protection, under which deposits held in a collapsed bank would be moved into a special vehicle and paid back to savers within days.
The scheme would be one of several measures to return confidence to the system and allow the Bank of England to carry out its role as a lender of last resort.
Mr Darling indicated that deposits of up to £100,000 might be protected, although the final figure has yet to be fixed.
Under the current rules, depositors get 100 per cent of the first £2,000 but only 90 per cent of the next £33,000.
Today’s change by the Financial Services Authority to the compensation scheme will make the figure £35,000 with a 100 per cent guarantee.
Mr Darling, speaking alongside Alan Greenspan, former Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, will make it clear that this move is just the first step in improving the financial services compensation system.
Mr Darling will say that in a global financial market no country or company can insulate itself entirely from international risk. “If a problem does happen, we need to be able to deal with it quickly to maintain stability and confidence.
Savers need to be sure that they can get their money out if they need to.
“That is why in the current market circumstances we are providing a guarantee for Northern Rock’s depositors. But for the future, we now need to put in place a better regime.”
Yesterday Conservatives accused the Government of inconsistency because its treatment of Northern Rock was exceptional.
To stop the run on the bank, the Government guaranteed the full deposits of investors as opposed to the limited sum of £35,000 which is being proposed today.
George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, said: “Alistair Darling has piled confusion upon confusion. Why did he tell one newspaper that savings would be guaranteed up to £100,000, only to change his mind ten days later and offer protection at a much lower level? What people want in a period of financial instability is certainty, not fiddling.”
Michael Fallon, a senior Tory on the Treasury Committee, added: “Northern Rock has been given preferential treatment throughout. The compensation scheme is chaotic.
"They are making it up on the hoof. The amount keeps changing. Is it going to go down to £10,000 in a week. I thought it was going to be £100,000 a week ago.”
But an aide to Alistair Darling dismissed the criticism, saying that today’s move was just the first step in a wider move. Subsequent changes to the compensation system will now be the subject of consultation.
The aide said: “Today’s announcement is just a first step. It is irresponsible to suggest that we would implement a full scheme without consultation. We want to establish a system that works.”
The scheme was set up in 1997, bringing together the existing compensation schemes from the different financial sectors into a single scheme. It raises money from the industry to pay out on claims.
In the interview with The Times Mr Darling suggested that eventually setting a figure of about £100,000 for guaranteeing deposits would encourage big savers to spread their money around.
He promised changes to regulation to bring in far greater transparency and prevent big investments being hidden off the balance sheet, and to enable people to know the risks to which they were exposed.
He wants greater focus on banks’ liquidity as well as their solvency – Northern Rock had been considered solvent but it had liquidity problems.
And regulators will have to focus on banks that seem to be doing well as well as those doing badly.
Mr Darling also wants changes to the Bank of England’s lender-of-last-resort system so that an institution would not be dissuaded from applying for help.
The run on Northern Rock began when its request for help from the Bank of England was made public.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more


The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I've just enquired about opening a deposit account with Lloyds TSB and was told that the guarantee applies for £35K for each account but was not doubled for a joint account. Therefore to get protection for £70K we would both have to open separate deposit accounts - can this be confirmed?
Lynne, Reading, UK
I'm still unsure of what this actually means. The FSA talk about protecting the first £35,000 of each depositors claim. What consitutes a claim?
Is a claim made on each individual savings account held, for example a building society, or is it as previously, the claim made on the total of accounts held?
In other words if I have £35,000 in each of three seperate accounts would I recieve the full £105,000 as a claim or £35,000? The former seems too good to be true.
Jim, London,
Perhaps someone could put me straight on this, but I believe that the Government is only offering protection for savings accounts and not investments. In other words any bank or building society account with a link to shares, the Government will not act as guarantor for. The media is giving the impression that the Government is covering everything and I think you'll all find that it's not true.
Judy , Liverpool, england
I stand to be corrected but as I believe it the guarantee applies to all one individual's accounts with one organisation. However you can have accounts with more than one company and the guarantee applies to each company.
In the case of joint accounts, the guarantee applies to each individual, so doubles up for two, but again if any (or all) have other accounts with the same company, then the guarantee applies once to the combination of accounts of that individual with that company.
John Claxton, Portishead, UK
Ridiculous- we need total guarantees- why not oblige Companies to reinsure their risks- ??
A.O'Dwyer, london, l
Darling darling's proposals for a US style scheme are all very well, but what happens if the bank does not have the cash to be transferred to the "special vehicle" and then repaid to investors.
How would his proposed scheme have worked re Northern Rock ? Not well at all, I'd guess.
Another example of Labour mouth open before engaging brain?
john f, aylesbury,
OK, so does the £35000 guarantee refer to every account or every inestor. ie do joint accounts qualify for a £70000 guarantee
Peter Baron, Chard, U.K.
When Mr. Darling first made some promises to guarantee savings in Northern Rock I commented on the vagueness of his statement and that in reality it wasn't worth much. Here we are 2 weeks later and rather than guaranteeing 100k this is still up for discussion. With this governments track record on honesty it comes as no surprise that savers are still left hanging and until legislation is passed and picked over by financial gurus I wouldn't trust anything thats said by Mr. Darling. As always with Labour its the small print or the unsaid that matters and in this respect theres a lot still missing. Until it becomes clearer (if ever) it has to be safer to spread your savings around as many different banks as possible or even put some under the mattress as this government will always wriggle out of any loose promises it makes.
Mike, Alicante, Spain
Surely the reason Northern Rock was given preferential treatment was because there was absolutely no chance whatsoever that savers would lose their money, they just thought they could.
Darryl Matheson, Elgin, Morayshire, UK
£35,000 in each of what can be several banks certainly protects "small savers" or households. When you expand it to large savers or institutions, you are inviting trouble by making it simple for bank managers to take on large risk strategies--their creditors won't care, but the taxpayers should.
ken scott, Stanford University, california, USA