Gary Duncan, Economics Editor and James Charles
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

The lowest interest rate in the history of the Bank of England will deter savers from depositing money and further undermine troubled banks, it was claimed yesterday.
Two thirds of savings accounts are set to pay less than 1 per cent after the Bank cut the cost of borrowing to 1.5 per cent yesterday. It has now cut interest rates by 3 percentage points in as many months.
Financial experts warned that the ultra-low rates would not boost the stalled economy.
Ben Thompson, mortgages director at Legal & General, said that the cut in rates could backfire by denying banks the flow of new deposits needed to fund fresh lending.
“What lenders need more than ever are savers' deposits - and they are not going to get them if they can offer only paltry rates of interest,” he said.
Michael Coogan, of the Council of Mortgage Lenders, said: “This is a double-edged sword. Lower savings rates impact lenders' ability to attract deposits and maintain the flow of mortgage lending.”
The average savings rate is currently 1.43 per cent but Moneyfacts, the financial website, predicted that this would now fall to 0.93 per cent. Higher rates of up to 4 per cent remain available, but only to those willing to lock up their money for years. Savers currently have about £944 billion held in banks and building societies.
Michelle Slade, of Moneyfacts, said: “It is going to be a very tough year for savers. Once the latest rate cut is factored in we are expecting to see the lowest returns on record.”
The Bank's decision was criticised by groups representing pensioners, millions of whom depend on income from savings.
Gordon Lishman, director of Age Concern, said: “Many older people who rely on the interest from modest savings to top up their income will be anxiously counting the cost of recent cuts - particularly as so many are already struggling to pay household bills.”
Joe Harris, general secretary of the National Pensioners Convention, said: “An average pensioner with £10,000 in the bank or building society has already seen their income drop by about £6 a week, and today's cut will only make the situation worse.”
This week the Conservatives outlined plans to help to protect savers by proposing to abolish tax on the interest of basic-rate taxpayers' savings.
Alastair Darling, the Chancellor, said that banks should respond to the cut with improved lending facilities. “We have to ensure that having ensured the banking system is there, that it starts to lend, to businesses and to people,” he said. “We've announced a number of measures to do that and as I've made clear, over the next week or so further measures will be necessary.”
George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, said that yesterday's rate cut was “necessary” but called on the Government to help savers.
Announcing the rate cut the Bank said yesterday that the economy had probably shrunk faster over the past quarter than in the previous three months, when it slumped by 0.6 per cent. It predicted further falls in GDP.
The cut was good news for many of the 3.7 million mortgage borrowers with “tracker” loans that follow base rates. A household with a £150,000 interest-only home loan will save an extra £62 a month from February 1, and have made a total saving since the start of October of £430.
Some 300,000 homebuyers however, will be denied the benefit of the new rate cut because of a “collar” imposed in small print that limits reductions in their mortgage rates. The Nationwide, Skipton and Yorkshire building societies, and a few smaller lenders, will not reduce tracker rates.
About one million homeowners on variable rate deals will also have to wait and see whether their lender decides to pass on the cut in full.
Only Lloyds TSB, Cheltenham & Gloucester, Nationwide, Skipton and HSBC among leading lenders committed yesterday to passing on the rate cut to borrowers on their “standard variable rate”. Halifax will pass on only a limited quarter-point cut to its variable rate borrowers for a second month in a row.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more


The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Isn't 0% a good rate of return nowadays? I would expect that if 1 to 0% is the best rate going, banks will have little trouble attracting depositors.
bill streeter, ST. LOUIS, USA
I now have no reason to continue to invest in UK savings and will withdraw the lot as there is longer an incentive to invest. This income supplemented my pension. Savers are being treated very badly at the expense of borrowers so the banks and building societies deserve their lack of funds.
Dave, Telford, England
My savings will make little this year in interest , I accept that, so now we will slash our spending even more and slap the face of this goverment and the BOE and there debt depressed farce. I give no quarter. Roll on the election.
Alastair, Edinburgh,
However, banks are still offering bonds from six months to two years enabling savers to earn anything from 3% (Barclays) to 4.5% ( Bank of Cyprus )
Why are these never mentioned ?
John Smith, London, UK
So Rose is OK if responsible savers earn (note "earn", not receive unpaid-for benefits) less to bail out irresponsible borrowers - including HMG?
And it's not a dismissive "£6 less". From a safely obtainable 6% to 1.5% - that's a 75% fall in income. Think on that in your old age & be dismayed!
Ian, New Malden, Surrey
It is all very well trying to get savers to spend their money. My savings are there for repairs to my house when necessary, not for spending on stuff I dont need. My savings went into foreign banks ages ago. Why accept a pittance?. I am an OAP so have to be prudent.
Mabs, Northants, UK
You reap what you sow. Let them all collapse under their own weight. Masters of the universe they are not.
Joey, London, UK
Banks/regulators got us into this mess. Now they are told to lend responsibly. That means less. The UK government is charging them 12% for the money we loaned to them. If they only get 3-4 % from new mortgages no wonder they wont lend. The US gov is charging 6%. Go figure
george, london,
Pull your savings money out of the banks NOW --- and then invest in gold, platignum etc.
Why should good savers bail out the silly lenders & borrowers
Phil, Preston,
Well Rose, here's hoping that there are plenty of tax paying, mortgage payers to keep you afloat when you are a pensioner!
Maggie, Reading, UK
Is Rose, W.Sussex serious?Those pensioners have already paid a lifetime of tax and mortgages ,and are not being kept 'afloat' by her.They are the responsible victims of this situation - What a joke! Why didn't they spend, spend ,spend like all the others and then get bailed out by the government
Sue, Athens, Greece
The banks seem to be crying foul again when the interest rates are going down. falling interest rates will dent profit margins for the banks as people who have tracker mortgages will obviously benefit from falling rates.
strangely the apr on my credit card is rising even though rates are falling
ali, leeds, united kingdom
I am sorry that pensioners with good savings have £6 less to spend. but current mortgage payers who earn middle income wage, have to spend out a lot more to keep those pensioners afloat. It is the turn of the taxpayer and mortgage payer to have respite on their outgoings
rose, West Sussex, England
Ivestec run an account which daily averages the top 5 UK savings accounts interest rates, but you need £25000 to open it! ING are running an instant access account at 5% and is very easy to set up with a 2.5% bonus rate for the 1st year.If you do some research you can find some good savings deals.
Tom , Portsmouth, UK
If banks are desperate for depositors money to enable lending to flow than who is forcing them to follow BOE in cutting their savings rates?? I can bet that if there was an 6-7% deposit account available on the market, people would queue to put their money there! Banks are just too greedy!
Maciej, Hove,
I don't believe the Moneyfacts analysis. Saving is on the rise as people are finally realising that their property "wealth" is not the nest egg it once appeared.
People won't go overseas with savings now because your pound won't buy much anywhere else anymore.
Bruce McGinn, London, UK
Banks are reluctant to pass on BoE rate cuts when it comes to setting their mortgage rates-i.e. a BoE rate cut does not 'force' them to cut their lending rates.Similarly, these same banks aren't being 'forced' to cut their savers rates.If they want to attract depositors,they must offer a fair return
Adrian, Hatfield, UK
As most banks operate a system whereby they 'manage' their own lending rates, any cuts are almost pointless. Until there is legislation to ensure that all lending is linked to base rate no real change will be seen. This is even more relevant to credit cards with the very high unlinked rates charged.
Maurice Horwood, Bexleyheath, England
I wrote to The Times yesterday but unfortunately my letter was not published re Anatole Kaletsky's article. I have always been prudent, never lived in debt and saved for retirement and now face an enormous drop in income to bail out those who borrowed too much.
Sheila Matheson, Woodford Green, UK
"The lowest interest rate in the history of the Bank of England will deter savers from depositing money..."
Well, duh. Depositing money in British banks, anyway. So yet another vital function will go overseas. A few years ago we were going to live off our wonderful financial sector. And now?
Tom Welsh, Basingstoke,
All of the best savings rates are with foreign owned banks and that is where all my savings are (spread to keep within the FSCS limit of course).
People without deposits or without a high enough income should not be allowed a mortgage anyway.
Steve, Coventry,
I thought that was the whole point. Make saving the less attractive alternative to convince people of the relative merits of spending over saving thus stimulating the economy.
Tom, Okazaki , Japan
Surely the whole point of the base rate is that it is a target achieved by the BofE buying/selling money in the market and therefore lowering the rate means that banks will just source more of their capital requirements from the BofE instead of savers - so who cares?
Jeremy, Southampton, UK