Jonathan Leake, Environment Editor
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
LAVISH subsidies and high electricity prices have turned Britain’s onshore wind farms into an extraordinary moneyspinner, with a single turbine capable of generating £500,000 of pure profit per year.
According to new industry figures, a typical 2 megawatt (2MW) turbine can now generate power worth £200,000 on the wholesale markets - plus another £300,000 of subsidy from taxpayers.
Since such turbines cost around £2m to build and last for 20 or more years, it means they can pay for themselves in just 4-5 years and then produce nothing but profit.
The lucrative outlook has led to a surge in planning applications for new windfarms. There are already 165 wind farms operating 1,944 turbines in Britain but another 34 are under construction, a further 118 have planning consent and 220 are under consideration, according to new figures from the British Wind Energy Association.
If they are all built it would mean up to 4,000 more turbines being constructed across Britain - a prospect that is also generating a wave of protest.
Around 140 groups have been set up around the country to oppose wind farm projects, citing fears of noise and light flicker from the rotating blades and the impact the turbines will have on the landscape.
John Webley is chairman of the Kentish Weald Action Group against wind turbines in rural Kent, whose 200 members are fighting plans for a 415ft turbine planned near the village of Marden and financed by HgCapital, a City investment firm.
He said: “This would ruin a beautiful rural landscape and is far too close to homes whose residents’ lives would be ruined and properties lose value.”
Some experts question whether wind farms give good value for money. Among them is Dieter Helm, professor of energy policy at Oxford University, who calculates that it costs consumers up to £510 for each tonne of CO2 emissions avoided through wind energy.
“The level of subsidy for onshore wind farms is very high and it distorts the market, making it more attractive to invest there than in other technologies like solar power,” he said.
Ofgem is also concerned. “We calculate that renewable energy subsidies will add £60 to consumer bills this year and that will keep rising,” said a spokesman.
Defenders of renewables point out that wind turbines are a relatively new technology facing an entrenched fossil fuel industry and so need help to get going.
Dale Vince, founder of Ecotricity, which has 12 small wind farms, said: “The reality is that climate change is the biggest threat humanity has faced. We need every bit of green energy we can get and those who say otherwise are simply wrong and selfish.”
A crucial issue for turbine profitability is the so-called load factor – the proportion of power generated compared with the theoretical maximum. According to government statistics, the average load factor for turbines in 2006 was 27.4%, meaning a typical 2MW turbine actually produced only 0.54MW on average.
The subsidy system means, however, that turbines can make a profit even when they are operating at very low load factors.
The worst performing turbine in Britain is said to have a load factor of just 7%, meaning it produces a fourteenth of the power it was designed for. Two former senior Ofgem executives have cast doubt on claims by energy companies that the recent 15% increase in household bills is due to the higher cost of wholesale gas and electricity.
The executives, who left only recently, say Ofgem has been far too weak. They point out that the wholesale market price of energy is largely irrelevant to the big six companies because they tend to supply their own energy or have long-term deals with power generators.
One said: “There is a problem in the wholesale markets which Ofgem has failed to get to grips with. The wholesale prices don’t represent what the energy companies are actually paying.”
Fuel firms in forecourt ‘rip-off’
PETROL companies were accused yesterday of “ripping off” motorists by failing to pass on the falling cost of oil to customers at the pumps, writes Steven Swinford.
The average price of petrol in forecourts has risen to record levels in the past month and now stands at £1.04 a litre, despite crude oil falling from $100 a barrel to around $90. Retailers are paying 7% less for petrol than they were at the beginning of the year.
Louise Doherty, a spokeswoman for price comparison website PetrolPrices.com, said: “It’s outrageous that instead of actually passing these savings to their customers, they’re doing the exact opposite and raising their prices. Motorists are getting a raw deal here.”
The high petrol prices have led to growing anger among businesses. Last week more than 700 companies joined forces to call on Alistair Darling, the chancellor, to scrap a planned rise in fuel duty.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Re the âshockingâ profit that the turbines make, which means they pay back in 4-5 years. Almost no business touches an investment that pays back in more than 5 years, so the fact that the renewables obligation certificates are set to this level is a great balance.
Re load factors, coal and gas power stations, and even nuclear, have load factors around 50-75%
Re wind turbines can turn a profit even when they have a poor load factor. This is inaccurate â the way the renewables obligation certificates work is to provide money for each unit of electricity generated, meaning that businesses will show the most interest in the windiest sites. Sites with a poor load factor will turn a much worse profit, and if it probably wonât pay back in 5 years, then they wonât touch it.
Re the wind turbine with a load factor of just 7%, this is the demonstration 225kW wind turbine at the main office of Renewable Energy Systems Ltd, by the M25. Itâs a small demonstration project to raise awareness
Peter Robinson, London,
I live in a beautiful rural area of Norfolk where Entrag which to put up 7 wind turbines, and we will fight them all the way. Wind is not the anwer here. Climate change is not something that has happened over night, yet it is the new buzz word. I agree that something has to be done about carbon emmissions, but come up now, you ask the next generation if they would get rid of the TV, DVD, CD players they have in the bedrooms, and go back to having one in the main room of the house, ask them if they will wait until they are 21 before they have a car, instead of 17, ask them if they would help dig up part of their gardens and grow veg. so the family do not have to travel so far to get the food they eat, ask them to only have seasonal veg. and fruit and not buy strawberries in Dec. We could all do so much more than just recycle a few cans and plastic, but it takes a little more time and effort .
Lyn Woodwark, norfolk,
In answer to Robin Smith, the answer to the returns on turbines is: subsidy.
To quote a paper written for the Small Business Council: "... electricity sales contribute only approximately 30% of a renewable stationâs income, while the remaining 70% comes from indirect subsidy paid for by the consumer, whether they have elected for âgreenâ energy or not.â
The National Audit Office found that onshore wind developers are being paid twice what would be needed to encourage development on most sites.
Ofgem calculated last year that it costs between £184 and £481 to cut a tonne of carbon under the renewables obligation. This compares with a cost of between £12 and £70 under the European Unionâs emissions trading scheme and £18 to £40 under the Climate Change Levy.
As Paul Golby, Chief Executive of E.ON UK (formerly Powergen), has written, "Without the renewable obligation certificates nobody would be building wind farms."
Gordon, Berwick, UK
This is an absolute nonsense and a disgrace.
If Technologies to produce alternative - renewable - fuels and energies are to survive they must be capable of doing so without subsidies!
This wind energy debacle is a disgraceful use of UK and EU money that has to be referred to the European Union as it shows that the UK is supplying higher grants to this sector of renewable technologies than it is doing to other industries.
SimHull, High Wycombe, UK
Ministers John Hutton and Malcolm Wicks plan to spend £7bn erecting wind turbines around the UK, how much fossil fuel and CO2 will this investment save? The answer is virtually nil, as once connected the phase angle of wind power oscillates (hunts) in phase with each gust of wind, power stations with reserves of energy will still have to burn the same amount simply to iron out these oscillations. It is hard to believe we once led the world in science and technology.
Brian Christley, Abergele , UK
Energy policy in this country is a total disgrace and will prove to be the single most disastrous legacy of this failing, flailing government when Cameron's future green Tory (will they follow the leader and save the planet by making their houses "energy neutral'?!) government have to explain why Britain (or rather the EU regions that used to be Britain) is plunged into daily power-cuts and a ruined economy.
The government has been allowed to get away with this by a woefully negligent opposition and feeble media.
As our dependence on power - electricity, gas, petrol etc - gets ever greater, the supply cannot match it and so the price balloons.
Of all the supposed sustainable energy sources we could have chosen to focus on, wind power was the daftest, so of course, that's what this government has done. It is little more than a vanity project, where decisions were made in the absence of logic or scientific evidence. We face a cold, dark future.
Harlan Leyside, Basildon,
One grows rather tired of the self-righteous hysteria from Dale Vince and other speculative wind developers.
Have countries with a very large installed wind capacity seen a corresponding substitution for thermally generated power? The answer is no.
It is no coincidence that some of the most critical voices of wind power generation come from the companies that manage electricity supply and distribution.
California's Independent System Operator states:âWind resources are intermittent, and historically the output from wind generators is lowest during summer system peak [demand] hours."
Germany, with c. 20,000 turbines manages an unstable system by shutting wind turbines down, losing c. 10% of their output. The German Government announced last year that they are building 26 new coal-fired power stations.
Some 80% of Denmark's wind production is dumped below cost to other countries while they are forced to buy in nasty nuclear power from Sweden when electricity is actually needed.
Gordon, Berwick, UK
This story doesn't seem to add up. How can a turbine operating at 27% cover its costs in 4-5 years, surely this would be 15-20 years. Also I think it unhelpful to lump all turbine businesses into one basket. Ecotricity was building before any of the big 6 and it is clearly motivated by climate change rather than gross profit. I believe Dale Vince when he says renewables need all the support they can get. We need to innovate and evolve our carbon free power generation quickly - rather like mobile phones, once huge and heavy and less than efficient - investment will lead to the breakthroughs future generations will depend on. Wind turbines are not just power units, being localised they bring us face to face with need to change and the need to get a grip on consumption. Dale Vince is little short of a hero, he should be applauded. We must recognise great British engineers or risk getting left behind yet again. Because this time it could be fatal.
Robin Smith, London, London