Valerie Elliott, Countryside Editor
Win VIP tickets
Green Central: click here to read Times Online's environment blog
Sir David Attenborough, the naturalist and wildlife broadcaster, has enraged countryside campaigners by supporting a 70 metre tall wind turbine for Glyndebourne opera house.
In an unlikely stand-off, the veteran environmentalist is on collision course with the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE). Conservationists object to the wind turbine because the site is in the South Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
They claim this is not a Nimby (Not In My Back Yard) rant about renewable technology but insist it is the wrong scheme in the wrong place.
The aim of the opera house is to construct a turbine near the site of a former windmill on Mill Plain, between the villages of Glyndebourne and Ringmer in East Sussex, to reduce the opera house’s annual emissions of carbon dioxide by 71 per cent.
Sir David, 82, who has been a fan of the opera for more than 50 years, and who lives in Richmond, is to give evidence in favour of the single turbine at today’s planning inquiry in Lewes.
He believes the wind turbine will reduce pollution in the area and help to save the wider planet from the impacts of climate change. His views are set out in a submission sent in advance to the planning inspectorate.
He said: “Having visited the proposed site, I noticed that it is close to a place where not so long ago, a windmill once stood. I suspect that were that windmill still in existence, many of us would regard it as a welcome feature in the essentially domesticated Sussex landscape and would speak passionately in favour of its protection. That, surely, is because most of us have a care and affection for the past. I certainly have.
“But I also have a care and affection for the future. A wind turbine, with its graceful lines, collecting energy from the environment without causing any material damage, is a marvellous demonstration of the way we can minimise our pollution of the atmosphere, if we wish to do so. It would help protect not only the countryside we have known for centuries but also the wider world beyond.”
He also showers praise on Glyndebourne Opera for developing such a scheme, which he described as “wholly admirable, demonstrating as it does that some communities really do take ecological challenge seriously and do not simply utter pious words and leave it to others to take action”.
A coalition of campaign organisations, known as the South Downs En-vironmental Protection Consortium, is to stage a protest outside the inquiry premises, the White Hart Hotel in Lewes.
Tom Oliver, head of rural policy at the CPRE, which is part of the coalition, said: “We greatly respect the work of Sir David Attenborough and his huge contribution to world conservation. However, we strongly disagree that a national iconic landscape need be damaged and enjoyment of it by millions of visitors spoiled through locating a giant turbine in the designated South Downs National Park.”
He blamed Glyndebourne’s carbon footprint on the dominance of private car use by opera-goers.
“We need renewable energy but not at the expense of world renowned beautiful landscapes and against the majority of local public opinion,” he said.
Others opposing the move are the Open Spaces Society, the Ramblers’ Association and the South Downs Society.
In a separate move Bill Bryson, president of the CPRE, today begins a national debate on the future of the countryside and its role in society in 2026, the campaign’s centenary year.
A vision of the future suggests that school visits to rural areas would be included in the national curriculum, that there will be more organic food, that the growth of villages and market towns as consumers will ensure a revival of locally produced foods and that more people will visit the countryside for recreation.
Speed of change
— There are currently 1,951 operational wind turbines in the UK, generating enough power to meet the needs of 1,345,813 households
— Wind turbines start operating at wind speeds of 4 to 5 metres per second (about 10mph) and reach maximum power output at around 15 metres/second (about 33mph). Very high wind speeds, such as gales, are counter-productive as turbines shut down
— A modern turbine produces electricity 70-85 per cent of the time, generating different outputs that are dependent on wind speed. Over a year, it will generate about 30 per cent of its theoretical maximum output.
— Most wind turbines producing electricity consist of three rotor blades which rotate around a horizontal hub. The hub is connected to a gearbox and generator, which are located inside the nacelle (the large part at the top of the tower where electrical components are located). The wind turns the blades, this spins the shaft, which connects to the generator
— Large modern wind turbines have rotor diameters of up to 65 metres and towers sometimes reaching 80 metres in height. They typically last 20 to 25 years
— In a year, one 1.8 MW wind turbine produces enough energy to run a computer for more than 1,620 years.
Source: British Wind Energy Association
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
No wind generator in the country is economical. every single one of them gets a free handout from my tax, otherwise it wouldn't get built in the first place.
Glyndbourne would do more for the environment by closing its car parks and making people take the bus instead.
KR, Stockport,
I am sure that Sir David's intentions are good - perhaps as I suggested in the Eco Geek column on exploding wind turbines, the turbine industry should be more adventurous in looking for small and less compromising alternatives - I advocate the use of small turbines that can be incorporated into buildings in bricks, tiles, in domestic buildings, used on bridges and tunnels, everywhere in such a way that they are aesthetically pleasing and do not contribute to environmental problems. To this end, I suggest the setting up of metropolitan research groups (the cities use most of the energy) that map out and configure urban vortices to maximise the design - I cannot believe that we can not think small - or rethink the old prop design - the latter has many problems connected with exposure to elements, metal fatigue, etc. Smaller and easily replaceable turbines ( if possible) are the solution.
Stephen Pain, Odense, Denmark
all these people who are against the wind turbine ought to provide an alternative, if they are interested in doing things to help the environment.
May I suggest an equivalent Solar Voltaic array.
yes very expaensive but it could be particial financed by all these critics of the wind turbine, but would they. This coud be placed on a local school to earn money for that school.
Or what about helping to esatablish a digestor to eat all the waste food they, and the supermarkets, throw away.
The critics of wind turbines are so negativen never suggesting an alternative solution or offering any money towards that solution.
martin , newtown, powys
Shame on Sir David. It's got nothing to do with NIMBY-ism. The problem is more one of continued government spin by installing highly visible pretty feeble generators in areas that are often pretty wind-defficient ie a bowl in the downs. More spin, less real action - a familiar story. Do something that will have a real impact on clean energy generation - construct the 8,600 MW Severn Barrage for example (5% plus of the total UK energy needs for the next 120 plus years and clean and renewable). However, despite it's obvious advantages, there are complaints again on environmental grounds, "periodic" flooding of wading bird mud flats (not a particularly pleasant looking environment anyway in my opinion). Give and take I say, but do something that is really viable, rather than just spin us along. Shame on David Attenborough for falling in to the trap.
RJHP, Wiltshire,
Has that Attenborough also knowledge about windmills? Or is it just the green feeling, which in fact is the real gain of windmills.
Jan Bus The Netherlands
jan bus, uitwellingerga, Netherlands
Great minds Ian, I was about to say exactly the same thing. Put a nice rustic stone outer layer on it and no one will tell the difference. I doubt it will be quite as efficient but at least no one could complain it ruins the area
James, cambridge,
wind farms (factories) are not green.
They kill many birds and bats.
Carbon savings are exaggerated by 300 %
Back up generators are excluded from calculations.
If they did actually work they could show us the real
science to prove it . They cannot .
Predicted savings and asumed output never fit
with the actual figures , all hype and no facts.
agent phyzx, notts,
It's a ludicrous situation when "green" fights "green" - who is greenest? It's similar to the question: who is more religiously devout? As the Times reported on 24/01/08, to meet EU compulsory targets, the UK will have to build an extra 20000 turbines. No place would be exempt from these monstrosities, unless the idea is to site them north of the Watford Gap and west of Reading. Of course, it's a licence to print money for the members of the British Wind Energy Association. The farce owes its existence to incoherent energy policy making based on causing the least offence to eco-warriers. Short-termism and vote catching may be the government's motto, but the only way to secure the future is to expand the UK's nuclear power capability. It's patently absurd that the UK imports electricity from France, which has 59 nuclear power stations.
Dwight Vandryver, Scholar Green, Cheshire, UK
Darren, great point about transport to the countryside, they'd change their tune if the had to cycle!
Brett Ducker, Harrogate, England
Personally I think these nimby bandits ought to have more respect for Sir David Attenborough given his diligent, respectful, brilliant contribution to our knowledge of the planet and his devotion to conservation. Conservation isn't all about things that look pretty you know; "ugly" windfarms might be just as useful as a pretty nature reserve in our drive to look after the planet.
Sir Davids biggest fan, Bristol,
I had the exact same thought. If the can make mobile phone masts look like trees, then surely they can find a way to make these turbines look like the more 'traditional' local buildings.
On a related note, they bang on about keeping the countryside tech and pollution free to encourage tourism, but the car/bus is the only way these people will ever see it. I hope the irony is not lost on them.
Darren, Norwich,
The obvious answer is to restore the old mill with all-new guts inside. I've no idea how much power windmills produced, but if it was enough to overcome the friction of wooden gear trains and heavy millstones, it ought to be enough for one opera house.
It would probably even win a bucketload of awards and start a trend.
Ian Kemmish, Biggleswade, UK