David Charter and Greg Hurst
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Brussels EU leaders clashed last night over how to cut greenhouse gases a year after making climate change their top priority with a series of tough targets.
The first signs of a retreat from the much-trumpeted green pledges came from Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, who called for concessions for German car-makers and heavy industry.
Gordon Brown re-launched a joint proposal with French President Nicolas Sarkozy for reduced VAT rates on eco-friendly appliances but it failed to gain widespread support at the leaders’ spring council meeting in Brussels.
The sound of brakes being applied to the EU’s climate change plans led Jose Manuel Barroso, the European Commission president, to warn the 27 leaders that their credibility was on the line.
Mr Barroso believes that only a clear EU timetable for cutting CO2 and dramatically reducing car emissions will persuade the rest of the world to set ambitious global targets at a climate summit in Copenhagen next year designed to follow the Kyoto protocol.
But Mrs Merkel, who helped to negotiate Kyoto as German environment minister and championed EU targets agreed exactly a year ago, arrived yesterday in Brussels determined to protect German industry from losing competitiveness in the rush to go green.
“I will be standing up particularly for jobs in Germany’s car sector,” she said, under pressure from manufacturers such as Mercedes, Audi and Porsche which face big fines if they do not reduce exhaust emissions substantially.
“We want a fair set of rules here,” she said, adding that efforts to protect the environment must not damage Europe’s industrial base.
Mr Barroso told The Times yesterday that the EU would act to protect different industrial sectors such as cement or steel after 2012 if they faced unfair competition from countries that refused to join a new global climate agreement.
But the Germans, backed by the Austrians and several other EU countries, want heavy industry to win immediate exemptions from the emissions trading scheme which is designed to force companies to cut CO2 or face financial penalties.
“The European Union would lose all credibility if one year after having given a strong signal, it was unable to meet its targets,” Mr Barroso warned yestreday.
Mr Brown returned to his idea of reduced VAT levels across the EU for low-carbon light bulbs, fridges and washing machines but it was met with a cool response.
One EU diplomat explained: “The whole idea of VAT is difficult because you cannot tell if it will really influence prices. If it is opened up, a whole set of other concerns over VAT rates will be raised such as whether Britain should keep its zero rating on children’s clothes and newspapers.”
The European Commission pledged to investigate Mr Brown’s proposal but a source added: “The aim is good but the tool is probably not the most efficient way of doing it. There are other member states which apply direct subsidies, for example in Belgium if you buy a fridge that is environmentally friendly you get back 50 Euros.” Downing Street said that it would continue to push the idea along with a call to use fiscal measures to reduce packaging.
EU states agreed last March to cut CO2 emissions by at least 20 per cent by 2020 from 1990 levels, to use 20 percent of renewable energy sources in power production and 10 percent of biofuels from crops in transport by the same date. But they have yet to agree a timetable and the share of the target to be borne by each country.

Honouring photographers who use their ability to raise awareness of environmental and social issues
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

The perfect summer companion


Overseas contacts and local business information
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Dr Cook's argues that big business wont clean up because of profits. Enviromental consultant - no vested interest there then.
Wills, Soton, UK
Surely even if the climate change arguement has been over-inflated there is no reason NOT to cut back emissions, if only for the health and well-being of people everywhere. the exception to this seems to be big businesses who cause the pollution and don't want to have to clean up their acts as it affects their profits; having spent quite some time in some very heavily polluted cities as an environmental consultant I've seen the affects pollution has on the human body and that's certainly no myth!
Dr DJ Cook, Cambridge, England
Over 400 World Wide Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007. See http://tinyurl.com/2dv6nz
Dr F Coles, Los Angeles, USA