Jon Ungoed-Thomas and Roger Waite
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Homeowners who splash out on wind turbines and solar panels are being paid for the electricity they generate, even when they use it all themselves.
The perk can be worth several hundred pounds a year and is being subsidised by other customers through their electricity bills. It is part of a government package to encourage alternative energy sources but the generous payouts have surprised some homeowners.
“It’s staggering,” said Harry Metcalfe, publisher of the supercars magazine Evo, who has installed a 30ft wind turbine in the grounds of his large farmhouse near Burford in the Cotswolds. “I thought I’d just get paid for the surplus, but not the electricity that I use myself.”
His turbine provides power for his house and for underfloor heating in his garage, where he has a small fleet of sports cars. “I got the turbine because I love technology and am naturally mean when it comes to paying bills,” he said.
Under his agreement with his energy company, Ecotricity, Metcalfe is paid for 9p for every unit of electricity his turbine generates whether or not it is exported to the national grid. It works out at more than £700 a year and he calculates that the payback period on his £13,000 investment will now be only about seven years.
Dale Vince, managing director of Ecotricity, said that householders facing higher energy bills might balk at the payouts but they were an important incentive to encourage microgeneration, or domestic green power. “The current rate is actually probably too low to bring about the change the government wants to see,” he said.
The payouts are made under the Renewables Obligation Certificate scheme, which rewards power generators, companies and householders who create green power. The scheme costs up to £870m a year and adds about £10 to the average electricity bill.
Homeowners in urban areas are unlikely to benefit, though. Energy advisers say that the type of turbine the Conservative leader David Cameron has installed at his west London home does not generate enough power.
The cash can also be claimed if homeowners install solar panels. Nick and Fiona Mills, both 50, who live in Stroud, Gloucestershire, had 14 panels fitted in April 2007. Their electricity company, Good Energy, pays them 9p per unit of electricity. The panels meet almost all their power needs, and in the first year, they were paid £83 by Good Energy.
The Department for Business and Enterprise said the subsidies were justified because home generators did not produce carbon emissions from fossil fuels. The government wanted 10% of the UK’s electricity to come from renewable sources by 2010, and to double that by 2020.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
No-one seems to give any account of how much 'greenhouse' energy is used to make, then install these generators.Silicon cells are not 'raw materials'! It might well be that the electricity they generate over their lifetime of usage, is not much more than that used creating the system.
S. Barraclough, Huddersfield, Yorkshire W. R.
Just thought I would point out to Tom Taylor-Duxbury that ther is no such thing as "Orwellian double speak "
Ivan Davies, Wrexham,
Surely the planning departments in councils would refuse permission for EVERYONE to have a wind turbine in their garden,even if they could afford it?
C Underwood, Fenny Drayton,Warks, UK
My Gran will be so chuffed she's helping keep some spare sports cars (green I wonder) warm and rust free.
Utterly bonkers, especially the Orwellian double speak "the subsidies were justified because home generators did not produce carbon emissions from fossil fuels."
So that's OK then.
Tom Taylor-Duxbury, Ludlow, UK
Leo, good pint but surely the manufacturers costs will come down if enough people recognise the benefits, invest in micro generation and enjoy a shorter payback. Doesn't this subsidy amount to the same thing as subsidising the manufacturers in the long run ?
Timsky, Guildford,
Surely it wouldbe better to pay the subsidies to individual house owners and force councils to allow turbines, solar panels and grey water systems to be installed where possible?
John, Ramsgate, Kent
Maddness !!
"Leo, York" is right. the subsidy should go to the manufacturers to reduce the costs of the equipment so the rest of us can afford it. but then i know what the reaction of people in my street would be if i tried to put up a turbine.
Barry, woking, Surrey, uk
So we're effectively paying massive subsidies to very wealthy people who make a big capital investment to reduce their energy bills. Surely it would be better to pay the subsidies to the manufacturers of the windmills and panels to produce them on a much larger scale, so that they're much cheaper?
Leo, York,