Ben Webster
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
The Government is attempting to “blackmail” local authorities into introducing congestion charging by refusing to fund public transport schemes unless they are linked to a new tax on motorists.
The Department for Transport has established a £1.4 billion fund for investment in local transport but has told councils that any bid for a share of the money must include congestion charging.
Local authority leaders have accused the Government of trying to force their hand and make them take the risk of a political backlash from drivers.
More than 1.6 million people have already signed a Downing Street website petition against road pricing. Tony Blair will make a statement tomorrow responding to the petition, which closes tonight.
At least ten cities are planning to bid by the July deadline for the £1.4 billion because it would pay for tram lines, hundreds of miles of bus lanes and a huge improvement in rail capacity and frequency.
Under the rules governing allocation of the fund, recipient councils will be required to raise the overall cost of motoring for thousands of drivers in their areas.
The DfT has reneged on a promise to allow councils to offset congestion charging with a discount on other motoring taxes, such as fuel duty or vehicle excise duty. The rules state: “We have concluded that any rebating of revenues back to users, such as through national taxes, would be inappropriate for local schemes.”
The rules also make clear there will be a “secure lock-in mechanism to ensure that the road-pricing scheme is delivered as part of a package alongside the transport investment”.
Councils will also be banned from giving discounts to people such as nurses and shift workers who need their cars when there is little public transport.
Ministers have said that they want to test the technology for nationwide congestion charging by carrying out regional trials. They have repeatedly given assurances that these will take place only with the consent of local political leaders.
But the ten areas identified by the DfT as possible locations for the trials have all been told that they will have to accept congestion charging if they want funds for bus, tram and rail schemes and to relieve congested road junctions.
The ten areas are Manchester, Birmingham, Durham, Shrewsbury, Reading, Norwich, Bristol and Bath, Cambridge, the East Midlands (Nottingham, Derby and Leicester) and Tyne & Wear. Because their size would mean up to a million motorists taking part, the DfT is understood to be very keen either Manchester or Birmingham host a key trial.
Roger Jones, chairman of Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority, said: “The Government is pushing us very hard. They are saying ‘you either follow our policy or you don’t get the money’. We are being, in inverted commas, blackmailed.”
Gary Clarke, chairman of West Midlands Passenger Transport Authority, said: “The Government is trying to attach strings to this money. We were told that if we didn’t put road pricing in the bid, it wouldn’t help our case.”
A DfT spokesman said: “We have no intention of forcing local authorities to take forward pricing in their areas. Evidence suggests that road pricing can be a powerful tool and we want local authorities to explore whether it would be the right approach in their areas.”
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It may be all well and good for people living in London and its subburbs; as vast amounts of money was spent by the victorians in providing a backbone tube and rail system.
Those of us living outside the M25 have no such infrastructure and no schemes like the Dome or the Olympics to pay for new transport links. The whole transport system was based on the infernal combustion engine, from personal transport to movement of goods.
County boundaries also lead to disjointed thinking and transport links, you may be able to travel within the West Mids, but not if you have to cross any of the neighbouring Warwickshire or Staffordshire borders or shropshire etc borders.
Mike Tustin, Bedworth, Warwickshire
Clearly the goverment has run out of things to tax us on, and is now looking for new ways to raise funds. The motorists again easy pray for what is becoming an excuss to raise more funds. We need our cars for day to day living in a modrn society yet we are being punished for using them they are quickly becoming the biggest household expense and the rising cost of using them is not even included in inflation figures. Maybe if we had a decent public transport system there would be less congestion and the issued raised of late would not even be considered. Just a nother tax to go with the increase in air travel where will it all end ?
Alan Bradburn, stoke on trent, england
No wonder that so many people want to leave this country, overtaxed, ignored and just treated with contempt. Don't these people realise the country put them into power, and it can quite easily kick them out at the next election. Councils should stand up to this blackmail, and serve the local community - again the people who have elected them locally, and whos council taxes pays their wages.....
I live in a small village, bus services are virtually non existent and I work 7 days a week trying to earn a living running my own business - I need a car, and cannot carry on my business without one. If the Government are so worried about inflation, where do they think this cost is going to be passed onto then - Consumers of course.
A fuel protest-type demonstration would be the only alternative - they listened then. Arrogance, that's all it is!
tony worrad, leicestershire, uk
I have been a motorist most of my working life, [not through choice, but necessity]. I and thousands of others down the years have paid for the roads that we now have, such as they are. Now Blair, [remember "things can only get better " ?] wants via road pricing to give these roads, the nations lifelines, to the rich and the priveledged. It is about time the citizens of this country reminded politicians of all persuasions that they serve us, not the other way around.
The level, standards, and lack of academic thought, within politics and politicians beggars belief !
Brian Hurst, Sussex, England
Francis, your view would maybe have some value if you were actually in England and not shouting encouragement from the sidelines in France. Come back and pay then perhaps you'd have a leg to stand on.
As for the rest of us we just have to hope and pray that this government is consigned to the dustbin of history at the next election.
Steve , Ipswich,
Just another tax - this government won't stop until they have 100% of ordinary workers earnings. What is so wrong about penalising the thousands of motorists who drive with no tax or insurance? Surely this comes first? But, perhaps not, as it is always easier to punish those not guilty of anything.
Peter Sherwood, Battle, East Sussex
I wonder who the government will blame when small businesses are priced out of existance, when nurses and teachers quit because they can't afford to get to work, when homes are reposessed from all those people who have overstretched themselves with huge mortgages and can't cope with the additional tax burdens and ultimately the economy goes into deep recession and British businesses and assets are being taken over and offshored by Chinese venture capitalists...?
If there was more attention and investment in affordable and reliable public transport, congestion would be controlled by the already high cost of motoring encouraging people to take clean, quick buses or trains, the environment would thus be protected and everyone would be happy... but I don't suppose that making people happy is on the government's agenda?
Kevin, Southampton,
More heavy handed tactics from governent. It's clear people don't want the charging schemes or thier privacy intruded on. Councils would be better off putting the money to be spent on congestion charging in to investing in public transport. Which woul dencourage more people out of thier cars.
Alex, Basingstoke,
Councils care about even less about council tax payers than Governments care about voters. They will sell us out very, very easily.
judy, liverpool, england
The Government suddenly have £1.4 bn to give to Local Councils. We all know what happens when Councils have anything to do with planning - nothing. Perhaps the money does not really exist then? If it does then the NHS debt is £1.3 bn. Job done and we are all happy?
Lionel Chapman, Gloucestershire,
The media, Politicians and reportedly the people claim that a greener Britain is desired yet the introduction of green taxes catalyses uproar from the media and the people. Surely it is time for the people to stand up and be counted. If you want a greener world, you will have to suffer some losses!
Francis, Paris, France
Blackmail is about the level of this government, i hope councils stand firm but i fear they are too weak and full of PC Guardianistalimpwristedliberals, those who can't a get a job in th real world. What a mess this country has become under Blair ...how can we ever get out of it?
Samantha Jones, Bucks, England
Me personally for the average driver think that increase in fuel plus the road tax and maintenance costs incurred to be a responsible driver are high enough and to add this proposed intention of a mileage fee will only cause more illegal drivers on the road and drivers like my self who have driven for over thirty years and abide by all that has been acquired to be a responsible driver have been met.is this how the government intent to repay that thirty years loyalty. not just to my self but to the millions of people like myself.
pauline brant, cleveland, uk
Surely we pay Road Tax for this - is it legal to withhold funding when we have already paid Road Duty?
Susan Sim, Ellon , Aberdeenshire
Congestion charges are just another form of taxation.
How much money raised by the existing road tax fund and VAT on fuel, is spent on road/travel improvements?
Britain, is planning for a rich/poor divide on an abilty to pay, when the infrastructure has already been provided by taxpayers, who will have to pay once again to use our own highways.
Politician's are insulated from these costs by engineering their own travel expenses (no receipts required and the public to be refused audit of MP's costs ) so they are going
along with this on the bogus premis, that it is mainly a conservation charge to save the planet.
Eddie Evans, Hythe, UK
This is just another waste of our money. Millions will be spent just to make out these out of touch Ministers are doing something constructive, such as the NHS computerised patient care system. Nothing has been said about how the road pricing system will deter drivers from turning what are, at the moment, quiet residential streets into busy "rat runs" to avoid mileage payments. Businesses will not worry too much, they will just pass the extra cost on the the end consumer, us. We have no way of deflecting the payments unless we give up working and stay at home.
Peter, Brixham, Devon
This is simply deceitful, and unfair on those who live in the target towns & cities. I live in Birmingham, and driving to work takes me approximately 10 minutes longer for a 10-mile journey than it takes on my scooter: which hardly equates to a terrible traffic situation, and driving is a lot safer . I also notice the chap from the West Mids PTA seems resigned to it, and his statement implies that the West Midlands have allowed the Government to attach as many strings as they like.
Adam Neilson, Birmingham,
It is just another cost to the person or business that *has* to travel through that region ... passed on to the end customer. It doesn't deter travel through the region but (perversely) encourages it ... just like the Toll Motorway around Birmingham!
Ian Phillips, Plymouth,