Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
The Liberal Democrats have begun drawing up conditions for a coalition deal in the event of a hung Parliament.
In an interview with The Times to mark his first anniversary as party leader, Sir Menzies Campbell said that the price of putting Gordon Brown in Number 10 would be a firm commitment to the introduction of proportional representation at Westminster.
The success of the Liberal Democrats in Scotland, where they secured proportional representation for local council elections, has made the party “more hard edged” about demanding its introduction for the rest of the country, he said.
“The party has moved. The party’s view is pretty clear about PR. If you look at Scotland, the Scottish Parliament, local government and European elections, they were all by proportional representation. The only one that isn’t is Westminster,” he said.
The Liberal Democrat leader confirmed that he had asked Paul Burstow, his chief whip, to report on how coalition talks are conducted. “You would be very surprised if I wasn’t getting assistance from any source that I thought helpful,” he said. The report will examine the conventions surrounding coalition discussions, last used in February 1974.
Sir Menzies attempted to play down the move, saying that it was part of wider election preparations, and insisted that he did not want the party to become distracted by theoretical discussions. “I am by no means convinced of the statistical probability of a hung Parliament,” he said. “I think the one thing you cannot campaign for is a hung Parliament, you have to campaign for your own policies and your own values.”
Speaking on the eve of the party’s spring conference, which starts in Harrogate on Friday, Sir Menzies would not rule out going into coalition with the Conservative Party. In the event of a hung Parliament, “there will be fine judgments to be made”, he said.
But the Liberal Democrat leader also indicated that there was little personal chemistry between him and the Conservative leader. He contrasted his relationship with Mr Blair, who “has very good manners”, and Gordon Brown, who “was around forever”, with his more formal relationship with David Cameron. “Curiously, I know one or two people who know him, but [we don’t talk much] apart from being polite as we wait to go out to the Cenotaph or sit in St Paul’s together.”
In the past year Sir Menzies has launched a number of personal attacks on the Conservative leader, calling on him to apologise for supporting the Iraq war and branding his party a glorified advertising agency during conference.
Yesterday he made a fresh attack: “I noticed that Mr Cameron was saying we should let people stand up at Premiership football matches. You slightly wonder, if someone sent him a petition saying that the Earth is flat, would he say that this is a proposition that required careful scientific analysis.”
Although Sir Menzies has criticised some aspects of the Chancellor’s work, he refrained from making any withering statements about the Chancellor. Asked how a Brown premiership would differ from Mr Blair’s, he replied: “I don’t think we know. I think the economy will be the same, the authoritarianism will be the same, the targets will be the same. That’s the way he is. Expect rabbits out of hats.”
Would the Liberal Democrats challenge any major surprises produced by Mr Brown on becoming leader? “That depends on what colour the rabbit is,” he replied.
However, Sir Menzies sounded a warning for Mr Blair after he leaves office, to avoid anything too “evangelical” and to keep out of Mr Brown’s way. “If he is going to do something with a Blair Foundation, I think he would be advised to do something with a social purpose, rather than political.”
Sir Menzies defended his decision not to call for the resignation of any government ministers since taking over, apart from Mr Blair, who he has said should stand down now. “Well there’s a kind of ritual about that and I hope that I’m not a ritualistic politician,” he said.
He also confirmed that his wife, Elspeth, plays an important role in his political life. “We’ve always done it together. Right from the first time I took her to Greenock in 1974 to the shipyard meetings with loud hailers.”

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
No, STV does not give PR in single member seats. That is why multi member seats would be needed, as in the Irish Republic. The more members elected for the constituency the more proportionate it would be, but depending on the area, 3, 4, or 5 would be suitable.
Voters would be able to choose not only between parties, but also on individual candidates policies, e.g. pro or anti Europe, hunting, hanging, road charging. They could also take religious beliefs, sexual orientation etc into account.
Power to the voters!
Timberwolf, London, England
The "single transferable vote" doesn't produce proportional representation when conducted in single-winner constituencies. Let's take an extreme example - suppose that 30% of the voters in the country support the BNP, and the other 70% would vote for the devil himself to keep the BNP out. Assume that the BNP supporters are distributed uniformly around the country. In a proportional system, the BNP should get 30% of the seats in parliament. If you use the STV in single-MP constituencies, the BNP would get no seats. That might well be a good result, but it isn't a proportional one.
(Oh, and STV is really pretty horrible. Condorcet with Ranked Pairs is the electoral method that you are looking for.)
Sam, Chicago, USA
The Liberals were happy with the current FPTP when they were in government 80+ years ago,now they are a minor party that can't win under the current system they want to move the goal posts.
Any change to PR would ensure that the minority Lib Dem tail forever wags the dog.
john, Beckenham, UK
Proportional Representation must be by the Single Transferable Vote. This will give voters a real choice, and will not give the political parties extra power.
The Conservatives would be able to share in Government if they are prepared to work with others. There are quite a few Conservative-Liberal Democrat controlled Councils around, so obviously some Conservatives do not insist on absolute power.
Bruce Standing, London, England
I can think nothing more likely to lead to the break-up of the Union that Proportional Representation at Westminster. 30-40% of the population consistently vote Conservative but after PR have no chance of ever seeing a Government of that persuasion. The Liberals aren't likely to enter a coalition with the Tories so it would be Lib/Lab all the way.
The easiest remedy: remove the Scotiish MPs from the equation and hey presto the Left-Right balance is restored. Surely the most 'foreseen' un-intended consequence ever! And all to see a few Liberal Cabinet members.
Paul S Healey, York, UK