David Byers and PA News
Win VIP tickets

A pair of former Labour ministers denied they were seeking to "cause trouble" for Gordon Brown today, as they launched a website calling for a wide-ranging discussion on the party's future direction.
Alan Milburn, the former Health Secretary, and the former Home Secretary, Charles Clarke, launched The 2020 Vision site claiming that Labour needs a serious analysis of future policy before Tony Blair stands down, otherwise the party would be "sleepwalking" towards electoral disaster.
Both men have previously urged the Chancellor, who is runaway leadership favourite when Mr Blair leaves office later this year, to say more about what he would do as Prime Minister.
The pair's initiative will lead to speculation of a possible challenge to Mr Brown from the Blairite camp, amid signs that the Chancellor may not receive an easy ride into No 10.
Previously, Mr Clarke has said he is "very unlikely" to stand for the leadership while Mr Milburn has not made his intentions clear. Some commentators have suggested, however, that the pair are trying to encourage a viable centre-ground candidate such as David Miliband, the Environment Secretary, to challenge Mr Brown.
Speaking at the website's official launch this morning at Westminster's City Inn Hotel, the men denied that they were seeking to intervene in any leadership election.
"This is a debate about the politics and policies of the future, rather than an intervention in the leadership election," Mr Clarke said, standing in front of a flatscreen television parading an image of the new site.
"This is not about causing trouble for anybody, it's not about building up a putative candidate for somebody, it's not an intervention in the leadership process."
Mr Milburn also dismissed the speculation, adding: "That's not what this is about. If anybody wants a leadership campaign, that is a matter for them, but it is not a matter for us."
Mr Clarke later admitted, however, that Mr Brown had expressed concerns about how the launch would be perceived after meeting the men at the start of this week.
"He had a concern ... it would inevitably be seen through the prism of the leadership election, but that is a problem and Alan and I have worked very hard to ensure that that is not the case," he told BBC Radio 4's The World at One programme.
The hotel where the launch took place is situated directly beneath Millbank Tower, where the Labour Party headquarters used to be based. Labour MPs were also invited to the event, and a total of 16 attended along with a number of researchers. The meeting room where the launch was held was, however, mainly filled by members of the media.
In an e-mail to Labour MPs informing them of the new website this morning, the pair say their desire for "open parliamentary debate" is shared by many of their colleagues in the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP).
They described the coming few months, which are expected to see Mr Blair finally step down as Labour leader after 13 years, as "critical" for the party’s future.
"After 10 years in office, we will need to demonstrate that we have the vision and the policies to successfully meet the future challenges faced by our country and the wider world," it read.
"There will, of course, be many different points of view about the future direction we should take as a party, but we believe the critical thing is to develop an open process for ideas and views to be aired."
The site - which is fronted by a picture of a young woman looking into a set of binoculars accompanied by the slogan "Towards a progressive century" - was already posting a wide range of reader comments by lunchtime today, which were left by both MPs and the public.
One, from an unidentified person signing as Ed Clarke, said: "On the site today I see comments are moderated. Presumably this is so that nobody who doesn’t toe the New Labour line is excluded from the debate."
Another, from the Blairite MP Gisela Stuart, welcomed the debate, saying she wanted debate but did not want "divisions and factions in the party".
"Robust debate is necessary to ensure that our ideas are sound and have wide support within the Labour Party," she wrote.
At Prime Minister's Questions, Mr Blair was goaded in the Commons about the launch, which had finished minutes beforehand.
David Cameron, the Conservative leader, asked the Prime Minister: "Did you find time in your busy day to attend the meeting this morning organised by two former Cabinet colleagues to work out how to relaunch your Government?"
Mr Blair said he had not, but added: "I am delighted that a full policy debate is happening within the Labour Party."
Mr Cameron retorted: “Isn’t this the whole problem: you seem to think the Chancellor is Einstein but half the backbenchers think he is Mrs Rochester?
“Why don’t you let him out of the attic and we can get on with the main event?”
He was echoing a taunt by Frank Field, a former Labour minister, who last week compared Mr Brown to Mrs Rochester, the mad first wife imprisoned in an attic in the novel, Jane Eyre.
Mr Blair reiterated: “As I think you will find out, it is policy that will determine the future of this country. And every time it comes to policy, the truth is that you don’t know where you stand."
What they have said:
"The danger for us today is that Cameron learns the lesson from what made New Labour electable, and that we forget it" Alan Milburn, in a lecture on how progressives win elections, to the Australian Labour Party. February 13, 2007.
"While more people are better off, poverty has become more entrenched. We all pay the price. The taxpayers who pay the price of social failure, the decent hard-working families who live in fear of crime, the loss we all feel from a declining sense of shared community." Alan Milburn, in a speech on the future of Britain and renewing New Labour. September 14, 2006.
"We should learn from the mistakes of the past and devote far more energy, resources and creativity to building stable and secure societies in the aftermath of conflict." Charles Clarke, in a speech on the world after George W. Bush, to the Fabian Society. November 29, 2006.
"I never rule anything out for the future." Charles Clarke, when asked to rule out whether he will in future stand to be Labour leader, in an interview with the Oxford University newspaper Cherwell 24, on January 12, 2007.
"We should shift decisively to attach tax revenues to those things that the public wants to spend money on. The Treasury has conventionally rejected this proposal, including under this Government, on the fundamental grounds that it does not want any restrictions upon its freedom to act. I think that they do not give sufficient weight to the downside of that attitude, which is that the citizen does not feel any particular connection to or ownership of the way that their taxes are spent." Charles Clarke, on taxation during a lecture on economic policy and taxation after Blair at the London School of Economics. February 7, 2007.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
With respect, R.Lang, I think "ex-Labour ministers" is <i>precisely</i> the correct terminology in the case of the Blairite tendency!
:)
Mikey, Streatham, London
Put your hand on your wallet - Labor is going to review it's policies! Don't say you haven't been warned.
Christopher Holland, Canberra, Australia
They're not ex-Labour ministers: they're Labour ex-ministers. 'Ex' is a prefix that must be attached to a word, which implies that it modifies that word rather than the phrase in whith it occurs.
The Times seems to be suffering from the creeping semi-literacy that this government has introduced - along with all the other lower standards it has been proud of.
I don't think that the holder of the office of PM matters any more - most of us have been disfranchized by the politicians' wholesale adoption of standards of conduct that would have been abominated when men and women of integrity represented us.
R Lang, London,
Enter Messrs. Clark and Millburn, to the tuneful accompaniment of "Send In the Clowns"
David Speedie, Montclair, New Jersey, USA
Dear Oh Lord! If I hear the words "debate" or "conversation" uttered by a politician once more I think I'll seek them out and regurgitate my last meal over them. Do they have any idea how transparent they are? Do they REALLY believe the electorate is SO STUPID as to fall for this vacuous and patronising nonsense? So, Labour has a large majority based on a minority of votes cast - let's DEBATE what kind of DEMOCRACY (another old favourite, tossed about with gay abandon by our venerable leaders) is that?
Jim Bob, London Town,
This the best thing Labour have done in years. I say go for a wide open leadership contest, its what the voters want to see. And yes Brown should be afraid as he has no right to be crowned king.
RobertCarlson, London,
Used to vote labour, will not this time round. Gordon was made for the radio!
john, london,
Both the political party in power at the moment and the general British public should have a say in who is to be their Prime Minister. Surely that is democracy. There is clear unease in both the Labour party and the British public on some form of proposed annointment. Why not ballot both? Who knows - Brown might just win!
Gordon, Woking, UK
I do not think Gordon Brown should become Labour Leader after Tony Blair has left no.10 in my opinion there wont be lot of changes in Gordon Brown policy. We need a new Leader that will take us out of Tony Blair disaster policy for this country and abroad.
Munna, London, UK.
This all looks like divide and continue to Rule on the part of Tony Blair?.......until whenever?
Michael Blatchford, Bath, UK
It won't just be the PLP who are grudging and unenthusiastic at this supposed hand-over.
It is arrant nonsense (not to mention unbelievably arrogant) to assume that the voting public will accept this.
Following recent polls, one would have thought that any sensible person would realise that Tony Blair and the Labour Party (generally) have presumed public support one time too many - wrongly - and what do we have to look forward to....Gordon Brown. Good grief!
chris, London, UK
This is so pathetic.Failed Politicians who hate the Chancellor venting their spleen;Milburn and Clarke hate him.Can you imagine either of these two losers as Prime minister?
Reid is another example of less than appealing contender's for the job.
I am a Tory,but I'm afraid it's Gordon or nonentity and failure;bring them on!
Michael J Rigby, Chorley Lancashire, England