David Byers and Sam Coates
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
Patrick Mercer’s three-year career on the Conservative front bench came to an end after he gave an interview to Times Online about a new antiracism trade union set up for soldiers.
The Tories’ spokesman on homeland security, who came into politics after a long army career, wanted to voice his opposition to the new group, set up by Marlon Clancy, a soldier who complained that he was the target of racist attacks.
Asked about an antiracist trade union, Mr Mercer replied: “Absolute nonsense. Complete and utter rot.” But then he went farther.
He said that suffering racial abuse — as well as abuse about facial features, hair colour and weight — was common in the Army, and to be expected. “I had the good fortune to command a battalion that was racially very mixed. Towards the end, I had five company sergeant-majors who were all black. They were without exception UK-born, Nottingham-born men who were English — as English as you and me.
“They prospered inside my regiment, but if you’d said to them, ‘Have you ever been called a nigger?’ they would have said, ‘Yes’. But equally, a chap with red hair, for example, would also get a hard time — a far harder time than a black man, in fact,” he said.
“But that’s the way it is in the Army. If someone is slow on the assault course, you’d get people shouting, ‘Come on you fat bastard, come on you ginger bastard, come on you black bastard’.”
Mr Mercer added that he knew soldiers from ethnic minority backgrounds who used racism as an excuse for poor performance. “I came across a lot of ethnic minority soldiers who were idle and useless, but who used racism as cover for their misdemean-ours,” he said. “I remember one guy from St Anne’s [Notting-ham] who was constantly absent and who had a lot of girlfriends. When he came back one day I asked him why, and he would say, ‘I was racially abused’. And we’d say, ‘No, you weren’t, you were off with your girlfriends again’.” He added: “In my experience, when you put on the uniform then all differences disappear. If you are a good soldier, you will do well. If you are a bad soldier, you will leave prematurely. There is a degree of colour-blindness among the vast majority of soldiers. I never came across a piece of nastiness inside the battalion that was based exclusively on racism.”
Initially, the Conservative Party responded by playing down the remarks, saying that his comments were a personal matter and refusing to discuss them. It had no relation to his frontbench portfolio. “These are the personal views of a highly decorated, former commanding officer talking about his real life experiences in the Army,” a party spokesman said. Four hours later Mr Mercer was sacked by David Cameron. He said later: “The offence I have obviously caused is deeply regretted. I had the privilege to command soldiers from across the East Midlands of whom many came from racial minorities . . . What I have said is clearly misjudged and I can only apologise if I have embarrassed in any way those fine men whom I commanded. I have no hesitation in resigning my frontbench appointment.”
Conservative leaders over decades have fought to stamp out racism in their party with mixed results.
Days after William Hague urged his MPs to avoid using language “ likely to generate racial or religious hatred”, John Townend, a backbencher, claimed that immigrants were undermining Britain’s Anglo-Saxon culture.
David Cameron has gone far further than any of his predecessors to make the Conservatives more inclusive — trying to recruit more ethnic minority candidates, introducing ethnic monitoring of staff, and taking a robust stance in race rows.
He recently told an ethnic media conference that there was less racism in politics than there used to be, but that it still existed in all parties. “The difference is that now we regard it as entirely unacceptable.”
But the issue still dogs the party. Last year, Bernard Jenkin MP, who was in charge of candidate selection, caused outrage by suggesting that an Asian candidate would not be chosen for a seat because he was not a white male. When a councillor e-mailed a derogatory poem about asylum-seekers, Mr Cameron suspended her from the party.
Part of the problem is that, as modernising MPs admit privately, racism still pervades parts of the party. Grassroots activists in particular are notorious for being reluctant to embrace Mr Cameron’s modernising message, as are some of the more right-wing MPs.
The long history of race rows makes any new incidents particularly damaging for the Conservatives, allowing opponents to claim that they are the “same old Tories”. Only by acting decisively and quickly, as Mr Cameron has tried to do, can the party show that it takes the issue seriously.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Can somebody please tell me what is racist about Mercer´s comments?
Dominic, hull,
what next is he going to sack people for saying that there are ethnic minoritys in the army.
dave, merseyside,
Couldn't agree with you more Charlie... the character of an individual is the only thing that should and does matter - that is the point being made here, and i'm absolutely sure that is what Patrick Mercer believes.
'Damage limitation' on the part of DC is one thing - but what's really needed is for us as a society to address why such comments are still so potentially 'damaging' in the first instance.
Richard Mee, Cambridge,
Did he actually excuse the racist behaviour? I've read what I could find and can't see any attempt to forgive racism. Quite the opposite, in fact: it seems Mr Mercer was accusing lazy individuals of using racism to their own ends. At the very least, it's worth a discussion, rather than a hurried hush-up campaign to stop anyone talking about racism. (And what about the ginger nuts? Isn't anyone going to stand up for them?)
Morgan, London,
I feel so sorry for Mr Mercer, who has expressed honestly held views too clearly for his own good. The views are clearly inclusive and humane rather than racist. So the moral high ground has won and society has lost. There is something so ugly and unjust about the way he has been treated. You kind of hope that droves of people react against Cameron's decision.
Jonathan, London,
I also served as an infantry officer for five years. Patrick Mercer spoke the truth. Whilst there are racist elements in the Army, as in society at large, these are a tiny minority. Nonetheless, the Army has (and needs to have) a robust culture where soldiers learn to ignore their differences and focus instead upon teamwork and getting the job done. In this respect, the (admittedly banal) banter that occurs is irrelevant. People (especially officers, by the way) are often teased about certain traits. In the few cases that this tips over into bullying, it must be condemned. Mostly, it teaches you not to be too precious and to learn to get along with people from all walks of life. The Army is a great melting pot. The establishment of specific interest groups would only undermine this and the wider point that Patrick Mercer was trying to make is therefore right.
Jeremy, London,
Were David Cameron's decision to sack Mr Mercer a well researched, carefully considered and thoughtful one, it might have been more interesting. Instead we have the knee-jerk reaction of a deeply insecure 'leader'. Cameron has successfully illustrated in his decision exactly what Mr Mercer was trying to inform the public about. That lazy, good for nothing employees will make use of any weapon to protect themselves - in this case racism. Cameron has implied by his action that it's OK for employers to pay slovenly, witless people to do a largely poor job, for the sake of political correctness. Well done David Cameron for making yet another very poor decision. Well done Charlie Talbot from Derby for sticking up the remarkable and courageous Patrick Mercer.
Chrissie Evans, Pencoed, UK
I had the privilage of serving under the-then Lt Col Patrick Mercer for 3 years as a young platoon commander on ops in Bosnia and on numerous exercises. He was probably the finest commanding officer 1WFR has had in recent years - a true soldier's soldier, tough but fair, thoroughly professional, adored by his men - whatever colour - and respected by his subordinate officers. He was certainly not a racist - soldiers and officers progressed under him on merit alone, regardless of shape, size and colour. What a shame that a few ill-judged comments have prematurely ended his promising political career. It may have been political naivity to speak frankly to the media but it's a sad indictment of today's society that he should be sacked for telling it how it is.
Charlie Talbot, Derby,