Jill Sherman and John Goodbody
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Thousands of community projects covering health, education, arts and sport face cuts or closures over the next five years to fund the £9.3 billion bill for the 2012 Olympic Games.
The costs, which have trebled since the Olympic bid was submitted in 2004, have forced Gordon Brown to raid a further £675 million from the National Lottery and £5 billion more from Whitehall departments. The Tories accused the Government yesterday of “massive financial mismanagement” as Tessa Jowell, the Culture Secretary, gave MPs the first detailed breakdown of the costs.
It emerged last night that the Chancellor had been pressing for a much larger contribution from the National Lottery, which Ms Jowell strongly resisted. Government sources told The Times that the negotiations with the Treasury had taken so long because Mr Brown had wanted £2 billion from the lottery. Yet the £675 million cut in funding that was finally agreed provoked anger, despite Ms Jowell’s assurances that voluntary groups and existing projects would be protected.
The National Lottery is already providing £1.5 billion for the Olympics, and any further call on its funds will have a huge impact on services, its leaders said. While grants till 2009 will be protected, thousands of new groups applying for cash in the next five years are likely to be turned down.The Big Lottery Fund, which supports tens of thousands of community projects, is to lose 17.5 per cent of its funding, totalling an extra £425 million over four years. The Arts Council England faces an extra £62 million cut, the Heritage Fund will lose £90 million and Sport England will lose £55 million during the same period.
Ken Livingstone has also agreed to supply a further £300 million — but this will not come from London council-taxpayers, who are already paying £650 million towards the Games. The Mayor of London pledged he would protect transport fares, but his office said the funding would be shared between Transport for London and the London Development Agency which is buying the land for the Olympic site.
The £9 billion covers the £5.3 billion cost of the park, including £1.7 billion for regeneration, £600 million for security, £850 million for VAT which will be met by the Treasury, £390 million for a community sports programme and a £2.7 billion contingency fund. The rising costs of construction, security and consultancy fees, the big contingency fund, and a shortfall in private sector fiance, are the main reasons for the problem.
Hugh Robertson, Tory Olympics spokesman, said: “The fact that the Olympic budget has almost trebled in just a year is a sign of massive financial incompetence from the Government. In raiding the lottery to make up the shortfall, the Government will penalise the clubs and small organisations up and down the country that were supposed to benefit from the Olympics.”
Peter Hewitt, chief executive of Arts Council England, said he was deeply disappointed that more money was to be diverted away from the arts. “The impact is likely to be felt across the whole of England and disproportionately by smaller arts organisations, local projects and individual artists — the main recipients of our lottery funds,” Mr Hewitt said.
Dame Liz Forgan, chairwoman of the Heritage Lottery Fund, said that the cuts were “bad news for the UK’s heritage” and that she expected libraries and museums to face serious cutbacks. “In recent years our lottery money has been the single largest source of support not only for our historic places, museums and galleries but also for our natural heritage and the cultural history of the people of these islands.”
Derek Mapp, the chairman of Sport England, said: “The decision to divert a further £55.9 million of Sport England’s share of lottery income between 2009 and 2012 to fund the Olympics and Paralympics seriously endangers the creation of a sporting legacy from the 2012 Games.”
Sir Clive Booth, chair of the Big Lottery Fund said that the Government’s decision to divert £425 million from its good-causes resources “will be a cause of concern for many organisations across the UK”.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The arts and the Olympics are both a waste of money. Put the money into education or the NHS.
judy, liverpool, england
I thought just last week Tony Blair was preening himself saying that under his leadership there had been a renaissance of the arts in the UK. And now, days later, Tessa Jowell is grabbing over 60 million pounds of money dedicated to the Arts Council. Some renaissance! I think members of this government are so out of touch with reality that they have really given up worrying what anyone thinks about them. They simply do as they please and to hell with everyone else.
Caroline Kennedy, San Jose, Costa Rica
9bn. for the Games (and rising)!!
How many hospitals could have been built with this; how many additional doctors, nurses could have been employed within the NHS; how many A & E departments have been closed in the last 12 months due to 'lack of available funds'
The Government then add insult to injury in offering the underpaid and overworked employees of the NHS an absolute pittance of a pay increase.
Shame on you, Mr. Blair and all those associated with this totally unnecessary 'White Elephant' !
Mr. G Able, Kent, England
The Government should come clean and admit to the World that, thanks to their incompetence, we are unable to host the 2012 Olympics. That would draw a line under the whole sorry business and avoid us all further hardship.
Who would really care? The British public has little appetite for the self indulgent and self celebratory Olympic bandwagon.
Paul, Rochester, UK
I do not understand why government are propagating the view that the games will cost £9.3bn. The actual cost to government is only a fraction of this if you take into account the all the taxes which will be paid back to government out of the £9.3Bn. Not only are we talking about VAT, but aggregate taxes, land fill taxes just to name a few. On top of this the regeneration bill should be spent regardless of the games as the area desparately needs it, so should not be attributed to the cost of the games. Take away the contiguency amount, which is an astonishing carrot for companies to over run on their costs, you have a very reasonable costing games; an event I am sure we are all going to enjoy.
One point don't use the excuse of the high costs to justify high entry prices to any events. The games should be for the poeple, not high powered and salaried executives.
Eric Cooper, MILTON KEYNES, UK
The only one way to stop this silliness is to come up with an even sillier thing.. It has to be PC to the Nth degree, and utterly useless to anyone in the UK.. Build a huge Statue and Temple covered in Gold to St Al Gore of Green. That should take a billion or two.. Then build an equally large Statue to "The Unkown Disadvantaged Child'. That seems about right on the Richter scale of assinine schemes in line with the Olympics. The only purpose of the Olymipics is cater to the Olympian ego's of politicians.
Desmond Taylor, Houston, TX