Jill Sherman, Whitehall Editor
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Ministers were accused yesterday of letting business off the hook after announcing proposals for a “pay-as-you-throw” household rubbish scheme to boost recycling.
David Miliband, the Environment Secretary, presented plans to let councils charge residents extra for throwing out excessive black-bin waste with rebates for those recycling more.
He is also backing the introduction of sealed food waste containers to trap methane, which can be used as an alternative form of energy.
The plans are part of a waste strategy for the next 20 years that proposes more demanding recycling targets for household waste to make big cuts in landfill. Councils will have to recycle at least 40 per cent of household waste by 2010, rising to 50 per cent by 2020.
But council chiefs and environmental groups claimed that the proposals were “too little, too late” and that householders and town halls rather than business would pay the price.
The stategy document proposes to reduce junk mail and to encourage supermarkets to cut back on single-use plastic carrier bags. But there were no new requirements for retailers to cut packaging, with only vague plans of future targets.
“Our key objectives are less waste, more reuse and recycling, more energy from waste and less landfill,” Mr Miliband told MPs. He claimed that there had been a step-change in recycling performance since 2001 but said that England still lagged behind most of Europe.
Lord Bruce-Lockhart, chairman of the Local Government Association (LGA), told The Timesthat the proposals placed a heavy requirement on the council taxpayer rather business. “The balance between the private sector and the local resident needs readjusting. There are voluntary agreements but no teeth.”
He also said that councils would need more money to meet the targets. Town halls already pay the Treasury £750 million a year in landfill tax and by 2010 they will be forced to pay EU fines on top. “The strategy sets out plans almost to double recycling targets which will be impossible to achieve without proper government investment.”
Mr Miliband made clear that it would be up to local councils how they operated any charging mechanism but he insisted that people would not have to pay twice for rubbish collection. Town halls would be barred from increasing the amount that “residents as a whole” pay to their council.
The document argues that before town halls could operate an “incentive” scheme they would have to provide bins for five different types of recycla-ble rubbish, including glass, paper, cardboard, food and plastic. It adds that all councils would have to set up properly enforced fly-tipping policies to ensure that neighbours did not try to offload their rubbish. Poorer families and disadvantaged groups would be offered some protection.
The paper does not provide a blueprint for the schemes but gives examples of European practice. In Treviso, Italy, electronic tags or chips are used to record when bins are emptied.
In Flanders, a transparent chip is used to identify a bin that is weighed and loaded on to a vehicle. Householders are billed for nonrecycled waste.
In Flanders waste is billed at 10p per kilogram, equal to £50 per household per year. Low waste households disposing of £20 worth a year have a rebate of £30. Those disposing of £80 worth pay an extra £30.
The waste strategy also proposes optouts for junk mail, including unaddressed flyers, with the aim of setting up a register for an opt-in system. In addition it details plans to encourage special recycling bins in royal parks and airports.
Peter Ainsworth, Tory environment spokesman, said: “It is clear that the Government’s current approach to waste is failing. This is because the Government persists in bullying councils, communities and families instead of making it easier for them to go green. We need to look at helping householders rather than penalising them.”
Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrat environment spokesman, said: “This is too little and too late. The Government’s 50 per cent recycling target for 2020 does not even match the best current standards in Europe such as Germany’s 58 per cent and the Netherlands’ 65 per cent.
“We have the third worst recycling rate in the EU, and ministers are far too unambitious. We need a right to return excessive packaging at retailers, trials of a plastic-bag charge plus more prosecutions for excessive waste and fly-tipping.”
Michael Warhurst, of Friends of the Earth, said: “The Government’s renewed commitment to recycling and composting is very welcome, particularly the promotion of weekly food waste collections and the proposal to give councils the opportunity to reward those who recycle more.”
The targets
— New target to recycle 50 per cent of all household waste by 2020
— An opt-out for all nonaddressed junk mail with proposals for an opt-in register
— Pay-as-you-throw schemes, including chip and bin
— Voluntary agreement with industry to reduce single-use supermarket bags and to minimise packaging
— Consultation on mandatory site waste management plans for construction projects
— Encourage anaerobic digestion, so that gases from concealed food waste can be converted into alternative energy
— Provide more recycling bins in public parks and airports
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I whole-heartedly agree with recycling but not a 'pay-as-you-throw' scheme. Council tax goes up above inflation every year, with no difference in the level of service or efficiency. I live in the countryside so we don't have street lighting or street cleaning, all of which we pay for in our council tax. The thought of our council then taxing us further to throw away rubbish-which is admittedly not a lot in our case- just makes me angry.
Our nearest neighbour puts his wheelie bins (he has 3) out next to ours for collection, and any time our bin is not full, he just puts more of his rubbish in ours! If a pay-as-you-throw scheme came in we'd be penalised for his junk when he has already more bins than anyone else could possibly need!
gillian, bedfordshire,
An open letter to David Miliband - I know there is a pattern in all your proposals. Given that much of what you propose is handed down from the EU, and therefore not your own thinking, I can still discern the pattern. You have been sold on the principle of Contraction and Convergence, but you are reluctant to own up to it. Is it because it was the brainchild of others and not your or your party's idea? I urge you to come out of the closet and confirm to the nation that C&C is at the root of your thinking, so that we can all see the future you have in mind for our environment. I believe the majority of Britons would buy into it very quickly. A win-win for you really, if you are brave enough.
clive, surrey,
Looking at places with wheelie bins about one in twenty have broken lids. The health hazard from rats and flies alone cannot justify the change to fortnightly collection. For those who sometime have to work away from home this degenerates into once a month even if missing only one collection.
If this is the best councils can do perhaps we should scrap them completely and get private companies in ourselves and be allowed an opt out from using the council. Then we could stop the money being syphoned off so the council worker's pensions don't go the same way as the private sector's.
David Cage, Highworth, UK
The family is fed up with being told to recycle and reduce waste. We recycle fully now (we have three very large compost bins, two wormery's and water butts). No waste is generated by my family - all we are do is pass through what is sold or provided to us by businesses when we visit shops, supermarkets or buy products on-line - waste we cannot control. Government should be legislating against businesses and not targeting people. Just judge the size/volume of the actual products you buy against the amount of fresh air in the packaging, etc.
A. Howell, Bury St Edmunds,
All of this is fine, but a very important thing that needs doing to encourage the population to recycle is to make it easy. Just look at countries like Spain, for example. There are recycling containers every 200 metres, so the only thing you have to do, is go out from home, and in the way to the underground, car park, etc... is to take your bag with glass or paper and put it in in a few seconds, instead of the need of taking the car to go to the tip to recycle plastic, as it happens in Doncaster.
And that green box is not very well "thought-through", as if you put cans and glass bottles with paper, it can get soiled and it won't be able to be recycled. But they tell you to wash them first. Well, what about water-waste??
And I will like to see the smell that is going to surround England in summer due to fornightly collection! And what about plastic bag waste due to the need of double bagging to avoid smell as the council information recommends??
Not very smart way of doing things
ER, Doncaster, South Yorkshire
Subsidise jobs for business, (tax credits), tax for business and now waste for business. Tell you what, just slap compulsory purchase orders on all of our homes and repossess them for taxation purposes and get it over and done with.........Oh, and don't bother paying us just require BUSINESS to give us bread and water. We can all sleep on park benches.
Judy , Liverpool, england
Surely this is a very small step to recycle household waste. Surely there could be more done at a more Governmental level to have renewable energy sources put in place so that very valuable carbon based fuels are not wasted. Once these are burned off into the atmosphere they cannot be replaced very readilly.
I do understand however that Council Taxing wasteful Councils is a way to pass the message onto the Council Tax payer.
d davies, Edinburgh,
Domestic waste is only a small proportion of the whole. Most waste that goes into landfill sites comes from industry. A large amount of domestic waste comes from excess packaging. Therefore is seems odd that the government is concentrating on domestic waste while allowing industrial waste to continue with the vague promise that industry will try to clean up its act. If the government were serious about this they would target industry and excess packaging. As they have not, one can only assume that this is yet another revenue raising scheme foisted onto already stretched council tax payers.
H Tait, Huntingdon,
I agree with waste recycling the only problem with Barnsley is that if you wish to use a recycling centre and have a small van or crew cab jeep you cant get in without first ringing the town hall to get permission to use the site, also you cant walk into the sites for some reason.What if you dont have a car and want to recycle waste how do you get rid of it at these sites.
BP, Barnsley,
What do we have to bear the ever increasing of COUNCIL TAX for.?
Tax and Tax again !!!
Bernard Parke, GUILDFORD,
Recycling has to be one of the most pathetic mantras of the green movement. It makes not one iota of difference. Our whole economy is based on increasing consumption and the world will never run out of resources, we'll simply modify what we consume. Landfill is purely a question of available space. Here in Greece there is lots, so everything goes to landfill. The methane emission issue is simply another of the climate change myths and an excuse to impose yet more tax
David Jenkins, Weybridge, UK
We have a small crate for waste paper. It has no lid so the paper gets wet and heavy when it rains, or blows round the garden when windy. I shredded some documents for security reasons, and was told off for putting the shreds in a plastic bag in the crate. For the next week I put the shredded paper in the bin. All the local jackdaws pinched beakfuls for nest building, and some they just pulled out and left to blow round the garden. Maybe they didn't like the colour? Now the shredded paper goes on the floor of the chicken house, and from there gets composted. We are asked to recycle paper to save trees.
I asked my postman not to put unaddressed junk mail in my letterbox. He said he has to deliver it as the Post Office has contracts for distributing this paper mountain. I asked him to save me a trip, and post it straight into the recycling bin - cutting out the "middle man" so to speak. He can't do that either. We are suppose to get no more than 9 a week I think. We get a lot more.
Beryl Russell, Windsor, England
I am actually happy about the pay-as-you-throw scheme, I mean to say that , as politians and government, push for more taxation and squeezing the British Public, of every penny , sorry pound, they can get. Fair Play to them. We British are pritty thick in the head when it comes to fighting against any thing. I myself hope they tax us even more, then maybe the British Public will wake up and think, all of these parties are basically out for themselves, even in the Green Scheme. Maybe a new form of Government will be grown from many years of bitter resentment at taxing the good and the dead.
Peter Hagan, Liverpool , England
Some ideas obviously need recycling here, unless we deal with the bigger issues of supermarket waste and industrial packaging etc,etc... individual contributions will largely be a recycled waste of time and effort.
In supermarkets in Ireland you bring your own bags, useful handy-sized, washable,sturdy and green. If you want to have a plastic bag you pay for it. Here, at least Tesco are offering green points to encourage people to be more aware.
Who though will manage to educate the young gangs that create litter and whose idea of recycling is measured in revolutions per second of drink tins and bottles?
Mary Bradshaw, Basingstoke,
its all very well the councils telling us to recycle but birmingham city council doesnt recycle plasic.
most of my bin waste is plastic bottles, plastic wrapping, carrier bags etc.
if they collect plastic the rubbish would fall massively.
also why do we only get one little box for paper, i read 2 newspapers a day at least and can fill the box in less than a week with junk mail added in there too!!
the councils claim to be serious about recycling but in my opinion they do the bare minimum to claim govt subsidies!
jps, birmingham, west mids
This government must be recycled . No mention of penalties for commercial waste , and the attititude that if they are paying for private landfill , that they do not have to recycle! Example of very well known supermarket chain who were undergoing a major refit, and they landfilled their ovens !!! House holders are making great efforts to be careful and thrifty with domestic waste, but how many holes in the ground will we need if the current commercial attitude continues! The pay as you go idea is just another headache put upon a very weary worndown electorate.
Mrs Maggie Snook, wool, wareham, Dorset
The UK gets more stupid by the day and the idea that we are behind parts of Europe for recycling is a joke. My wife and I emigrated from England 15 months ago as we could no longer cope with our once beloved country. FACT - here in the Canaries you may be lucky to see the odd bottle bank if you travel far enough. I can categorically state that in 15 months we like thousands of other residents just bag everything up as we please and dump it in the waste skips provided. Everyone seems to be on the same footing so don´t make us laugh about recycling being the same for all Europe. There is only one piece of trash that needs sorting in the uk and that is all those brain dead politicians who should be placed in a sealed skip and shoved down a mineshaft.
ps We love living over here and although we do get more than our fair share of immigrants they only use it as a stop off point on their way to the UK
terry, Mogan, Gran Canaria
We're only the voters after all, we don't actually give the politicians any money do we? Now if I was a captain of industry...
Jennifer Hynes, Plymouth, England
so once again the ordinary people suffer the consequences paying for a lot of unnecessary packaging it is the source that needs to be targeted . virgin land and wooded areas needs more protection from developers but like many things it depends on how much more we can squeezed.thirty years ago ordinary people were saying seasons were changing and nobody listened then so why penalise us now
b clarke, cardiff, wales