Sam Coates, Political Correspondent
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
David Cameron looks set to fire a member of his front bench who spoke out in defence of grammar schools in The Times today.
Graham Brady, the Europe spokesman, was “severely reprimanded” by the Tory Party chief whip after he produced data in which suggested grammar schools improve the results of entire neighbourhoods.
Mr Brady suggested that selection at 11 raises GCSE standards for everyone in the area, especially ethnic minority children. This came a day after Mr Cameron called critics of his refusal to bring back grammar schools "inverse class warriors".
A Tory source said that Mr Cameron “hit the roof” over the comments by Mr Brady.
Mr Cameron, along with his chief of staff, Edward Llewellyn, intervened first thing this morning, before the Tory leader flew off on holiday.
A spokeswoman for Mr Cameron said: “Graham has been severely reprimanded by the Chief Whip and told to stick to his brief.”
Mr Brady is now expected to lose his portfolio in next month’s reshuffle.
Mr Brady, a former grammar school pupil, was among the first Tories to challenge the party leadership’s decision to drop a commitment to bring back the system, under which pupils were selected by ability.
He called for an increase in grammar schools in inner city areas in an article on the New Statesman website. This caused his first meeting with the chief whip on the subject. Party sources suggested Mr Cameron was highly unlikely to tolerate a repetition of this transgression.
The Conservative Party is thought not to want a reshuffle at the moment, however. Mr Cameron is believed to be waiting for Gordon Brown to announce his first Cabinet before he reshuffles his own team.
The announcement of the policy by David Willetts, the Shadow Education Secretary, earlier this month led to the sharpest bout of discontent in the Tory ranks since Mr Cameron became leader 18 months ago.
Mr Cameron yesterday declared the row “over”, insisting that he wanted to focus instead on academic setting within non-selective schools in the hope of creating “effectively a ’grammar stream’ in every subject in every school”.
But Mr Brady revived the grammar school debate by releasing data to The Times which indicated that in areas with no selective education 42.6% of pupils get five or more GCSEs at grade A*-C including English and maths, compared to 46 per cent in partially selective areas and 49.8 per cent in areas where all pupils take the 11-plus.
He said: “These facts appear to confirm my own experiences: that selection raises the standards for everyone in both grammar and high schools in selective areas.
“I accept the party’s policy on grammar schools. But it is vitally important that policy should be developed with a full understanding of all of these facts, which might lead to the introduction of selection in other ways, including partial selection in academies and other schools.”
Mr Willetts told The Times today: “Many grammar schools are excellent which is why we are keeping them. But a whole range of serious educational researchers have shown that the chance of an able child from a modest background getting to an academically successful school, whatever their type, is low. That’s the challenge that we have to confront and we are now doing this openly and honestly for a long time with practical ideas on very good schools.”

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Let's get over this 'selection by ability' is old fashioned fallacy.
Labour allows some selection (10% of overall intake in subjects). The Tories want to tinker and offer a little more. So it is perfectly logical to extend that to removing all bars on selection.
The debate is not about whether selection is good, but how much is needed, and many of us cannot see how centrally-imposed preset arbitrary ceilings can ever work.
Just let the schools determine the right level *locally*.
Chad Noble, London,
The reason Mr Willetts why it is hard for a child from a modest background to get into a grammar school is there are so few of them. My son goes to a grammar school 30 miles from home because the local ones were made into comprehensive.s.
So the catchment area for existing grammars is huge so of course only the very brightest get in usually from middle class backgrounds and with coaching.
More grammars more children could get in from a wider background. Its called supply and demand. Ever heard of it Mr Half Brain.
william, Northwood,
Using raw data to illustrate educational performance is flawed.
Government interference and rigid fixation with data has led to a work force of disaffected Teachers and a generation of disaffected pupils. Figures and tables are used to demonstrate the need to impose ideologies using predetermined policy, this results in deep suspicion from teachers and their students.
Teachers have patiently and conscientiously introduced each new directive and initiative handed down by successive goverments. They have measured performance to a strict set of formula and have seen little or no real change in the rate of pupils' progress or their attainment levels.
It is unfair to accuse teachers of being fixated ( anti - selection, anti- setting by ability) when it is the political parties that demonstrate total ignorance of either independent or maintained schools and wholly dogmatic views that do not lead to improvements in policy, opportunities, quality of provision, or improved results.
Briar McDiarmid, Reading, UK
Even the Tory party needs to move on from Grammar schools. This is the Twenty First Century after all.
Dave Green, Sunderland, Tyne and Wear
Is the Conservative Party going to recognise its dreadful mistake and remove Cameron now, or is it content for Brown to win the next election?
Michael, Leatherhead, Surrey,
It's about time Cameron was expelled!
Colin Webb, Cleethorpes, Lincolnshire
That was quick!
If only he'd been as quick to take similar action against his party colleague Derek Conway who has apparently used taxpayers money through the parliamentary expenses system to pay his son as an assistant, despite him being a full-time university student in the north east of England.
Says it all about Cameron's priorities - another PR merchant full of spin.
What with Blair and Prescott living it up around the world at the taxpayer's expense, gold-plated pensions all round at Westminster, etc etc, isn't it only a matter of time before there's a revolution?
MarkS, Leeds,
Cameron should put this issue to sleep now. He isn't winning and should perhaps have taken better advice before he announced such a remarkable shift in policy for his party. Cameron is fast losing his appeal for the aspirational, if he ever had any that is. He hasn't really caught on yet has he, we don't all want to be the same. City academies will just fail everyone instead of the few , especially if they are forced to have a huge social and racial mix. So what is the advantage? I can't personally see any and that is what Cameron is offering. We don't need another misguided Blair.
Judy , Liverpool, england
One day someone will start a Conservative Party in this country. A Party that has a policy that can be identified as Conservative and not recycled Socialist Policy of yesteryear with the edges rounded.
When Cameron was voted in as leader, I voted for Davies, I resigned from the Party and glad I did. In my home town of Rochdale they even openly support the Labour Party againt the LibDems and always have.
I look forward to a Gang of Five 2007 Conservatives raising the flag and then we WILL have something to look forward to.
Peter Oldham, Rochdale, England
Clearly Windmill Dave won't allow facts to get in the way of his idealogical brainstorming. If he thinks the issue of academic selection has been settled I hope that there are enough Conservatives to give him and his coterie of sycophantic advisers a sufficiently rough ride to force a change of policy. Here is one vote that he won't get if the policy does not change and I doubt that I am alone.
Anthony Back, Wellington, Telford, England
I do agree that grammar school education should be here to stay, & the way in which the presence of the 11 plus test and selective entry has on a community is a positive one.
Vicki, Bracknell, UK
The intelligent hard working school children deserve a better chance without those that do not wish to participate. Those children with a lack of interest in the school system should be taught more practical skills and shouldn't have to fear the inferiority better able students have over them..a grammar system benefits both learning styles! If we can't trudt the Conservatives to stick to the traditional things that work...who do we turn to? ...a Question that will need much thought for the future.
Herowyn Beck, Wolverhampton,
Such arrogance and refusal to pay heed to those who gave him power beggars belief, worse than any displayed by Tony Blair. I am a Conservative supporter brought up in a coal mining town and beleive that the grammar school system, as shown by Mr Brady, works.
D & B Balfour, Anavriti, Southern Greece
I do hope that Mr. Cameron is not the only Tory" in step" over grammar School issue..
They have always been the back bone of our education system.
A sort of N.C.O ranking to the Officer class of Eaton and Harrow.
Bernard Parke, Guildford,
This Cameron idea for equal numbers of ethnic representation in schools. What happens if there are insufficient numbers of 'one sort' or another, does he intend to 'bus in' the requires shortfall, from another area.??
Keith Baigrie, Dartmouth, England
Coming through the tri-partite education system postwar, I failed the 11 plus but was allowed to retake a technical college examination to gain a place at the age of 14 to my local technical college, this college was under subscribed, which I was unaware of at the time meeting boys from a wide catchment area, pupils came from other local education authorities, who either had full college's or did not have the resources of their own. This allowed pupils with ability to progress and in some instances on to grammar schools 6th forms to obtain O levels. The argument of selection at an early age to assess pupils is a false premise, because the tripartite system was open ended and could receive pupils of ability at a later stage. There were also situations in which pupils at grammar who were found lacking, were sent down to either technical college or secondary modern and were replaced with pupils of latent ability. The system was well balanced and productive if the resources were put in.
David Owens, Bootle, Merseyside
Hi
I think we have found Camerons Achilles Heel.
Quite clearly Grammer schools by their nature
improove the results in the area where they are
located.
Sacking somebody for stating the obvious seems
absurb to me not only is Cameron following Blairs
policies he seems to have the same style of Team
management. (Im in Charge)
Mike Jenks, Solihull, West Midlands