Holly Watt and Robert Winnett
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
MEMBERS of parliament are using their taxpayer-funded expense accounts to buy iPods, plasma screen televisions and even, in one case, a fish tank, insiders have alleged.
Finance administrators have been approving a wide array of executive gadgets despite widespread public concern about abuses of the parliamentary expenses system. MPs routinely claim thousands of pounds a year without having to produce receipts or other evidence that they have made any purchases.
MPs have also remortgaged their homes to release thousands of pounds and then used their allowances to cover the repayments.
The names of MPs who have received the extravagant items have not been revealed but one well-placed insider said: “There has been a successful claim for a very expensive, large plasma television and for a fish tank. After discussion among officials in the fees office, both were waved through.
“Also, in the run-up to Christmas last year, a lot of MPs suddenly started claiming for iPods. The system really is outrageous.”
An official review into MPs’ pay, pensions and allowances, due to report to the prime minister later this month, is now expected to call for a tightening of the expenses rules.
Despite heavy lobbying from senior MPs, including Jack Straw, the Commons leader, the senior salaries review board (SSRB) is expected to call for a new “structure” for the payment of expenses to ensure that the necessary safeguards are in place.
This weekend John Baker, chairman of the SSRB, declined to comment on his forthcoming recommendations. But he said: “We read about them [abuses] with interest and ask ourselves whether the structure of expenses is appropriate. We have received evidence on the topic.”
The row over the £87m annual expenses bill erupted last month when MPs backed new legislation to exclude themselves from the Freedom of Information Act. MPs are currently blocking attempts from the information commissioner to force them to disclose full details of their taxpayer-funded expenses.
Mark Hunter, a Liberal Democrat MP opposed to the new legislation, said: “It is public money and it should be accounted for. I don’t believe MPs ought to be exempt under freedom of information and I thought the vote was a shameful day. This is precisely the sort of thing that gives MPs a bad name.”
An MP can spend up to £21,634 on the cost of maintaining a second home, either in London or in his or her constituency. This money can be used to pay almost all costs associated with running the home including furnishings, groceries, mortgage, utility bills and council tax.
A further £20,000 a year is available for paying the costs involved in running an office. Plasma screens, iPods and fish tanks could come out of either of these allowances. MPs can pick up a staffing allowance of up to £84,081 a year as well.
Last week The Sunday Times revealed that Derek Conway, a senior Conservative MP, paid his wife Colette £3,271 a month and his son Frederick £981. Frederick is a full-time geography student at Newcastle University.
Several other MPs also employ family members, including David Cameron, the Tory leader, who has appointed his wife’s sister, Alice Sheffield, as his correspondence secretary.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Tony Parrish, Liverpool, if you go to the House of Commons website (Google house of commons) and look at the directory of MPs you'll find that the vast majority do in fact have websites, or claim to have them.
John Gresham, Liverpool, UK
To Tony and Judy, no most of them don't (have web pages) but this has not stopped them voting themselves an extra £10,000 a year running expenses in case they do, i kid you not.
simon, leeds, uk
The EU sends 'root out corruption' messages to 2 eastern European members, but at the same time HM Government sees fit to drop a BAE investigation and now to permit MP's to claim expenses without properly accounting for them .
Though not publishing these expenses, should they not be 'audited' with the same old rules applied that mere mortals had to observe when claiming tax deduction for expenses:-
The holder of the office/ employment must be "necessarily obliged* to incur the expenditure; AND
The expenditure must be incurred *wholly, exclusively and necessarily* for the purposes of the office or employment; AND
The expenditure must be incurred *in the course of the performance* of the duties of the office or employment.
It was after all we mere mortals who elected every one of these Westminster "Unaccountables" and not vice versa.
Peter Tweedie, Bucharest, Romania.
Why should MPs different from the general public? How many employee cheat on their expenses (fuel for the weekend, private calls on mobile phones paid for by the company, getting drunk on expenses, etc)
Pierre, reading, uk
It's no surprise that MP's recently came last, behind used car salesmen, in survey rating the least trusthworthy ocupations. They are increasingly seen as profesional liars only interested in lining their own pockets
Andrew, Ayrshire,
Even more need for the FoI Act to continue to apply to Westminster.
Sign the Petition against the Bill: http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/foiparliament/
Support the campaign against the Bill trying to exempt Westminster: http://www.cfoi.org.uk/macleanbill.html
barry , edinburgh,
According to this report, and others, MPs are, allegedly, abusing the system of allowances, especially if they are purchasing items such as plasma tv screens, iPods and fish tanks and yet others, apparently, employing family members on their payroll. Little wonder that they voted to exempt themselves from the freedom of information FoI act if this is the way they conduct themselves. If Gordon Brown believes in more open and honest government then the first move must be to tighten the rules on MPs expenses and allowances and second, to state quite clearly that MPs are not exempt fro the FoI act.
Kenneth Armitage, Suffolk, England
Most of them don't have web sites....
Tony Parrish, Liverpool,
I am always puzzled by the fact that MPs who live outside of London and work in London have tax rules that are so radically different to the rest of us.
If I signed up for a 4 year contract in the city then HMCE would assume that it was my choice and the sensible thing for me to do would be to live in London at my own expense.
Mike Hinsley, Bristol,
Should they have web pages John? I wonder who pays to maintain them?
Judy , Liverpool, england
To quote many MPs "those who have nothing to hide have nothing to fear". I challenge them all to publish their full itemised expenses on their web pages.
John Gresham, Liverpool, UK