David Cracknell and Isabel Oakeshott
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
GORDON BROWN is to break with centuries of tradition by surrendering historic powers delegated to previous prime ministers by the Queen.
The new prime minister will this week publish plans to give up some of the royal “prerogative powers” enjoyed by his predecessors including important public appointments, the right to recall parliament during holidays and sending troops to war.
It marks a significant break from the era of Tony Blair who, like previous prime ministers, had rejected calls to relinquish the powers.
Brown is hoping that the significance and ambitious nature of the constitutional reforms will be compared to his decision in 1997 to hand over power to set interest rates to the Bank of England.
The Queen is said to be content with the plans, which were outlined to her by Brown at his 55-minute audience at Bucking-ham Palace on Wednesday. Insiders say she was pleased that Brown had consulted her on his proposals, in marked contrast to her irritation at Blair for seeking to abolish the ancient title of lord chancellor in his 2004 “botched” reshuffle.
Brown’s consultation document will propose:
- Removing the power of the prime minister to appoint bishops and deans, with the responsibility transferred to the Church of England;
- Military action should be be taken only after explicit approval by parliament;
- American-style “confirmation hearings” by MPs for key public posts;
- MPs being given the right to ratify international treaties and scrutinise the way honours are awarded;
- MPs being given the power to recall parliament during the recess if there is a national emergency;
- Drawing up a bill of rights.
Prerogative powers have been handed down direct from monarchs to ministers over many years, allowing governments to go to war, deploy the armed forces on operations overseas, regulate the civil service, and grant honours without need for approval from parliament.
The range and scope of the ancient powers was shrouded in secrecy until 2002, when they were listed by the government for the first time after pressure from MPs.
Some of the powers, such as the right to force men to join the navy, have fallen out of use, but others are regularly exercised, particularly in the field of foreign affairs. Brown has been working on the plans for months, drafting in the Cabinet Office and Jack Straw, the new justice secretary, to help them push it forwards. In a pamphlet in 1994, Straw argued that the royal prerogative has “no place in a western democracy” claiming it had been used as “a smokescreen” by ministers to escape scrutiny for their decisions.
Brown’s aides took the unusual step of telephoning the palace to inform them of every cabinet appointment before they were made public.
No 10 and Straw have remained tight-lipped about the constitutional proposals, contained in a lengthy document unveiled to the cabinet on Friday.
In an interview with The Sunday Times today, Ed Balls, one of Brown’s key cabinet allies, also refused to comment on the plans, but indicated that the palace had given a seal of the approval.
“There has been consultation with everyone who needs to be consulted in advance,” said the new secretary for children, schools and families. “The civil service has done a brilliant job because the consultative process has been very good.”
Brown has placed great emphasis on making ministers more accountable, restoring power to the civil service, not resorting to “spin” and handing back power to MPs. At Friday’s meeting, every minister was asked to contribute to the discussion about the constitutional reforms. Brown was said to be “humble” and long-standing members were surprised at his “tour de table” – a rare event during the Blair years.
Sir Alistair Graham, the former sleaze watchdog, urged Brown also to take up his suggestion for an independent panel to investigate allegations of ministerial misconduct. He said it would be a “serious error of judgment” if Brown rejected the idea.
- Tony Blair and his family suffered the indignity of having to sleep on the floor and eat an Indian takeaway out of foil cartons on their last night in Downing Street, insiders have revealed.
Removal men had packed up their furniture and crockery and left the family with just a mattress for Blair and his wife to sleep on, while their four children were reduced to having to make do with sleeping bags on the carpet of the flat over No11 that has been their home since 1997. The family are said to have made light of it all.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Well , What we need here is not a new reformed government. To many things in our great nation are 'new'. WE need to revert to history. I say, the government, for far to long, has snubbed our most sacred of institutions, The Monarchy. What makes us so special from the rest of the world? From those Vindictive fools, the Americans? You would have most certainly thought that 'they' would have figured out that the office of presidency is a joke. What can someone do in 4 years? in 8? Besides screw the country by squandering trillions by sending their over boisterous nation to war. Another thing is, leave political parties to the mps. WE must have a politically neutral 'executive' Head of State. Someone who is counseled the whole of their life for such a position. Someone who acts according to their conscious and for the people, not on the interest of any political party. There has been one person who as a institution embodies all of these things. the Monarch Revert power back to the Crown
Lord Northumberland, London, England
Promising news, all there is left now is the action, which may i add might actually restore some optimism in this country!
It is good to see Brown showing some respect for the monarchy (yes people it is still here so deal with it), and I urge him to do the same for the existing professions. This is crucial for the country to move forward and repair the cracks it has accumulated over the years.
and please oh please dont let this be a spin!
OC, Milton Keynes,
There is a clear need for a Bill of Rights, which gives additional constitutional protection to the European Convention rights as currently Incorporated into UK law under the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998.
Judges in the Royal Courts of Justice have carried out judicial acts at various Hearings that have breached the litigant's Convention rights, and then the Judges will not allow the litigant to rely on the Convention rights, even though this is clearly provided for under Section 7 1(b) of the Human Rights Act . In particular, two High Court Judgments / Reasons have been that: âIt is not open to a party to claim against the Courts still less to ask the Court investigate itselfâ. As a direct result, there is no effective protection provided by the HRA 1998 as interpreted by Judges in the Royal Courts of Justice. Therefore there is a real need for a Bill of Rights to address this denial of 'access to justice' and for many other valid reasons.
David Bent, Sunbury on Thames, England
I am not sure whether I need nor want a bill of rights - at the moment I can do anything I wish as long as it is not illegal. Writing a list of my rights will alway produce grey areas, a sort of can I/can't I situation, whereas at the moment it is easy and straightforward. Methinks this is just a wheeze to give our eminent lawers another avenue of income!
Peter, Brixham, Devon
Interesting developments, but changes STILL at the whim of the monarch, for example, "ma'm we intend to abolish Britain's undemocratic and anachronistic Monarchy" !!"Over my dead body" she would probably have answered, to which he could so easily have replied "..oh well so be it".William.
W Gladys, Yeovil, British Isles
My word, could Brown actually be a REAL *gasp* socialist?
starling, Lancaster,
I was thoroughly sick of Tony's tinkering with the constitution (I'm glad I wasn't the only one who noticed!!)..
If Brown brings in a half-decent Written Constitution and Bill of Rights he will get my vote.
Zwingli, Stetten, Germany
I get the idea of it just being spin, but i am optimistic that, these may be genuine steps towards a more democratic system of government.
America is a fine example, and it is obvious alot of Brown's proposals have been taken from, it really does feel like strong works of change, i hope they're not just words, i do hope that Brown becomes a bit more likeable, because theyres only so much real positive change that can be made in at most 2 and half years!
Daniel Gordon, Leeds,
I have always been amazed that our new Prime Minister looks so much like Rowan Atkinson. However, I did not not expect that he would take on the role of Monsieur Sauvage and bring down our constitution, and do so in such an ill-thought out, almost infantile way.
Klaus Becher, London,
He's off to a good start. Now may the next American President do the same.
Daniel Good, Mamer, Luxembourg,
The new prime minister will this week publish plans to give up some of the royal âprerogative powersâ enjoyed by his predecessors.....
The keywords here are 'publish plans', planning is not doing, it's too optative.
Drawing up a bill of rights.
We have a Bill of Rights!
How about restoring the bit about punishment AFTER judgment, in civil penalties that are of no significant difference to fines.
Brown has placed great emphasis on making ministers more accountable, restoring power to the civil service, not resorting to âspinâ and handing back power to MPs.
On what grounds are we to believe the 'great emphasis' in the article is not itself spin please, after 10 years of it?
Tony Winter, London,
"Tony Blair and his family suffered the indignity of having to sleep on the floor and eat an Indian takeaway out of foil cartons on their last night in Downing Street, insiders have revealed.
"
So? Most people when they move house have to put up with similar indignities Also, most people, Blair's included actually do have a choice. They could stya at friends or in a local hotel..
neil murphy, cromer,
I think this is very much a step in the right direction. Is it not rather contradictory in one respect, however: if only Parliament can send troops to war and the PM is deprived of the power to convoke Parliament during the vacation, does this not mean that the warring factions of the world simply need to confine their activities to August and September to escape all UK interference?
Leo Hayden-Clark, Edinburgh, UK
I rarely hear of people in power prepared to surrender some of their rights for the better democratic rule of the country. I think this initiative is great and fully support it.
luke, ipswich,
I am impressed with the Prime Minister's proposed reforms. It looks as if he is rejecting the "presidential" style of his predecessor and recognising the authority of the Monarch and of Parliament. I have to acknowledge it is a better start than I had anticipated.
Barrie Bridgeman, Coventry, West Midlands
For years I have looked forward to have a Prime Minister who gives the power back to the elected MP's and really listens to the people. If Prime Minister Brown continues this way I have high hopes for the country and he will get my vote and support. What a shame that ten years have been wasted under Blair who's wake up call every morning was "What must I do today to stay in power". Lets see this party system stopped and get the best people in the country to do the many specialist jobs.
Lionel Chapman, Wolverhampton, West Midlands
Sir, i am not surprised that Browns seemingly urgent need to "give up" some of his powers is presented in the general guise of his ostensibly benign, inclusive, accountable, and open government. Tis a fib, noting but a new kind of spin.
If Brown really wants to be democratic and accountable, he might start with giving us "stupid people" (in the words of Edian Monsoon, BBC) a say on a very fundamental question - whether we are happy with an undemocratic remote monstrosity that is the EU to over rule any one we bothered to vote for in the first place? What afterall is the point of us "voting" for anyone if Brussels will effectively make the most important decisions?
Mr Brown has opted to curtail his powers already, he will not have much left anyway. This seems to be nothing more than cashing in on a reality he himself created by use of yet more spin.
Hooray to voter apathy!
muji bally, london, england
Could they not afford to go to a Hotel,but that would have cost him money, haven't they any friends to give them a bed for the night. or have the friends now deserted him?
Mike, Paphos, Cyprus
I am in favour of a lot of the proposals. I think its a good thing that gordon brown is about to do.
However, I totally disagree and urge Gordon Brown not to give the power to parliment to decide if we go to war, and wether troops go overseas or not. I believe this will be detrimental to the security of britian and the safety of our troops. the MP's will use this for political means just to get one over the goverment.
stuart, Edinburgh, Lothians
A promising start, I concede. But I would rather wait some time before rendering my verdict.
Karm Arger, Kent, U.K.
"- MPs being given the power to recall parliament during the recess if there is a national emergency"
The obvious question poses itself: how can this right be exercised without parliament already having been recalled?
Martin Symington, Biddestone, UK
Its a good move, countering decades of arrogance.
However, though Blair may not have made quite the same plans, he DID also give away power, which was historically significant, and was arguably the basis for what GB is now doing after him.
Joe, Manchester,
The Queen should have some of the Royal Prerogative restored to The Monarchy such as appointments within The Church of England of which she is Supreme Governor and a more worldly-wise Christian than anyone in the Church hierarchy
Likewise the Honours System should revert to The Palace
Voyager, Leeds, England