Francis Elliott, Frances Gibb and Ruth Gledhill
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Gordon Brown has called in an established standards watchdog to police a new code on ministerial behaviour as part of a series of changes aimed at restoring trust in the way that Britain is governed.
The Prime Minister is also to give up his powers over a series of appointments including the Archbishop of Canterbury and judges.
Sir Philip Mawer, the current Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards will become the first Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests. Sir Philip, who has proved a tough enforcer of MPs’ conduct over the past five years, will oversee the publication of a report listing ministers’ outside interests as well as investigating alleged breaches of the rules.
Former ministers wanting to take up posts in the private sector will for the first time be required to abide by the decisions of an independent commmittee on business appointments in another tightening of the rules. The Government will also bow out of its role in appointing bishops in the Church of England in one of the biggest changes to the relationship between Church and State for generations.
The Prime Minister made it clear, however, that the Government remained committed to the establishment of the Church of England with the monarch as Supreme Governor.
In a separate proposal, senior judges could also be approved by Parliament under American-style reforms outlined by the Prime Minister yesterday.
Mr Brown said he wanted to remove the Lord Chancellor’s remaining residual powers over the appointment of judges. Instead, the Government is “willing to look further” than the present system, “including conceivably a role for Parliament itself, after consultation with the the judiciary, Parliament and the public”. Judges would firmly resist any move towards US-style “confirmation hearings” with candidates questioned on everything from their politics to their hobbies.
Candidates for other public appointments, however, might have to submit to cross-examination by MPs. Since ministers have ultimate responsibility for about 21,000 posts, only the most senior appointments will be subject to the new hearings. The list has yet to be finalised but is likely to include posts such as the Chief Inspector of Prisons and the Health Service Commissioner.
In yesterday’s constitutional Green Paper, the Government says the Prime Minister should no longer use the royal prerogative “to exercise choice in recommending appointments of senior ecclesiastical posts, including diocesan bishops, to the Queen”. The paper says the Prime Minister should not have “an active role” in the selection of candidates.
At present, the Church of England chooses two names for diocesan posts, including that of Archbishop of Canterbury, and presents them to the Prime Minister in order of preference. The Prime Minister has the power to choose the second name, or ask for more names.
From now on, the Church’s Crown Nominations Commission should put just one name to the Prime Minister, who would then convey this recommendation to the Queen.
Church leaders welcomed the change. The Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, said: “The Prime Minister and the Secretary of State for Justice consulted me about his intentions which I believe accord with the declared wish of the Church of England. I welcome the prospect of the Church being the decisive voice in the appointment of bishops which the General Synod called for 33 years ago. I am grateful for the Prime Minister’s thoughtfulness and for his overt support for the role of the Queen and the establishment by law of the Church of England which have been strongly reiterated in the Green Paper.”
The Church will also discuss with Government the way other senior appointments, such as cathedral deans are made. The subject is to be debated at the next General Synod meeting which opens this weekend in York.
However, the leader of the Roman Catholic Church in Scotland, Cardinal Keith O’Brien said: “I am deeply disappointed at the statement from Gordon Brown. I remain deeply concerned that the Act of Settlement will continue to exist and believe it constitutes state-sponsored sectarianism.
“I wrote to Gordon Brown in April 2006 following comments he made on the role of the Prime Minister in the selection of Church of England bishops to say that the terms of the Act of Settlement were anachronistic and that it was an outstanding example of bigotry and sectarianism in the United Kingdom . . . but did not receive a reply.”

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
One thing needs to be made clear. Gordon Brown could no more alter the Queen's position as Supreme Governor of the Church of England than he could, at the moment, stop it raining. Constitutionally, the Queen is Supreme Governor of the Church of England because she is Supreme Governor of everything - including mosques, temples, synagogues, chapels, churches and anything else you can think of. The difference with the Church of England is that her governorship is exercised through particular legal instruments - the system of 'establishment'.
The only way to stop the Monarch being Supreme Governor of the Church of England, therefore, is to abolish the Monarchy.
Revd John Richardson, Elsenham, UK
The Act of Settlement and the Royal Supremacy over the Church of England are anachronistic and, even in 16th-century terms, theologically ludicrous. The only precedent cited for the monarch's leadership of the Church by Henry VIII and his successors was the kings of Israel - a claim that is clearly ridiculous. The monarchs of Britain have traditionally had all the power of kings AND popes, all rolled into one. And all this so the King could divorce his wife! Furthermore, the requirement for any Anglican doctrine to be approved in Parliament of all things is utterly absurd. Usually when countries talk of separating church and state it is to free the nation from religious dominance; in the case of England it would free the Church from control by the Crown / government. I am a Christian, but for constitutional and theological reasons the sooner the C of E and the state become totally separate the better - the state CANNOT have jurisdiction in ecclesiastical affairs.
Gavin Rice, Southend-on-Sea, UK
It seems a little hypocritical to me for a Roman Catholic Cardinal to criticise someone for being bigoted and sectarian. I thought these were two key features of god-given faith?
Rob, Reading, UK
Isn't it a little unsettling that Brown has just removed the last political control over the church, whilst retaining full establishment? If Brown is uncomfortable with the idea of appointing bishops, then surely it would make more sense to simply disestablish the church, remove their right to sit in the Lords, and be done with the whole charade.
John Wilson, Basingstoke, Hampshire