Sam Coates and Tom Baldwin in Washington
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

Gordon Brown invoked the words of Winston Churchill yesterday by reaffirming his belief in the “joint inheritance” that binds Britain and the United States.
As the Prime Minister prepared to stay at Camp David as the guest of President Bush, he tried to damp down speculation about emerging transatlantic tensions and to quash claims that he is considering withdrawing British troops from Iraq.
Downing Street insisted that policy on Iraq remained unaltered and Mr Brown emphasised his deep personal affection for America, describing himself as an “Atlanticist” and saying: “We should acknowledge the debt the world owes to the United States for its leadership in this fight against international terrorism.”
As he set off to Camp David in Maryland, where he was dining à deux with Mr Bush last night, he quoted Churchill’s speech describing the principles of freedom and the rights of man as “the joint inheritance of the English-speaking world”.
The words will not be lost on Mr Bush, who has become a voracious reader of history and keeps a bust of Churchill — lent to him by Tony Blair six years ago — in the Oval Office at the White House.
Mr Brown said: “When, at my meeting with President Bush, I talk of a joint inheritance — not just of shared history but shared values founded on a shared destiny — I mean the idea that everyone is created equal, that there should be freedom of expression for all faiths, that arts and culture should celebrate diversity, that government should be open and accountable, that there should be opportunity for all — for all men and all women — and a belief in free trade.”
The reference to trade reflects Mr Brown’s determination to press for an agreement on international trade in negotiations this autumn. Aides say he has already had detailed discussions with other world leaders on this issue and a deal is “quite close”.
Other priorities for the British contingent in formal talks today, when officials joining the two leaders will include David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, and Condoleezza Rice, the US Secretary of State, will include the crisis in Darfur.
But Mr Brown’s spokesman dismissed suggestions yesterday that the Prime Minister would present the President with a plan to withdraw Britain’s remaining 5,500 troops from southern Iraq. Speculation had been fuelled by a report that Simon
McDonald, the Prime Minister’s foreign policy adviser, sounded out opinion about the effects of a British pull-out during a recent trip to Washington. This, according to The Sunday Times, left the impression he was “doing the groundwork” for a withdrawal.
The Prime Minister’s spokesman said that troops would remain until the Iraqi Army was deemed capable of maintaining security. “Simon McDonald made very clear at the meeting that the British Government’s position had not changed,” he added. White House sources say that they have been assured that Mr Brown’s Government will not even begin to look at changes before General David Petraeus, the US commander in Iraq, delivers his September progress report on Mr Bush’s policy of pouring more American troops into the battle zone.
However, that date has already assumed red-letter significance on Capitol Hill, where many Republicans are preparing to demand a new strategy. And Britain’s military chiefs have made clear that they should be ready to hand over control of Basra by the end of the year.
Mr Brown will leave Camp David later today for talks with Congressional leaders before going to New York, where he is expected to deliver a speech on international development at the United Nations tomorrow. He does not want to be seen as adopting Tony Blair’s seemingly uncritical support for Mr Bush or as damaging Britain’s relationship with America.
Washington has been irritated by what one official described as “mixed signals” coming from Mr Brown’s Government.
But Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for the National Security Council at the White House, suggested that the Administration had developed a fairly thick skin and understood the domestic political pressures facing Mr Brown. He said: “A lot of people around the world say a lot of things every day, but we know where the core relationships really stand.”

The aircraft allocated for use by the Queen and Prime Minister could double up as a refuelling tanker for fighters under plans being considered by Downing Street and the RAF, The Times has learnt. The RAF would release one of 14 new A330s fitted with enlarged wings and fuel pods that are attached only when it is on tanker duty. Other options include an A320 executive jet and a second, 20-seat aircraft for flights within Europe.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I can't understand, does Brown like to wear mask of Tony Blair. Nothing personal but the smile is almost the same
Denis, Moscow, Russia
The new British PM wants it both ways. He wants to avoid being seen as a lap dog to the U.S. -- *and* he wants to continue the policies of Tony Blair. Ha. Poor Gordon Brown; only a fool tries to separate reputation from deeds. Brown is finished before he's fairly begun. So long Gordy, we barely knew you.
Ned, New York,
Those of us who survived WW2 are in no doubt about the values and benefits of the shared inheritance. However when all has been subjected to the political and economic melting pots much depends upon the integrity of the Leaders. of the partnership. Bush is not a Rooseveldt and Blair never a Churchill - what Brown is made of remains to be seen. He has so far controlled his nerves exceptionally well during the crises of the past month. Much depends upon Bush's successor and improved Homeland defence on both sides of the Atlantic.
Robert Carmichael ., Kirk Ella,, East Yorks.,
Considering all the negative reports on the relationship emanated from No. 10 in the first place why is the media doing Brown's work for him by covering his world stage posture non event meeting with Bush.Spin is dead - you must be joking
Philip, Ipswich,
Its just a shame that the US seems to take the P out out of us and takes and takes and takes but gives nothing in return . Am I wrong ?. Of yes they did give us one thing, a never ending war in iraq.
Simon, London, UK
Ed Balls must be appalled that the PM chose to invoke our wartime PM, Churchill, who has been dropped as mandatory from our curriculum. Surely this invokation will be confusing for future generations of Britons.
How about a quote from Anthony Eden?
Richard Straughan, Bath, UK
The analogy between the very real threats that Churchill and Roosevelt faced down in the '30s and '40s and the total chaos that Bush has created in Iraq (with Blair's support) are entirely bogus. Chuchill knew who the real enemies were. He did not haphazardly throw a dart at a map to see who to attack next.
Kalmia Latifolia, Washington, CT, USA
Mr Blair had left behind his shoes for Mr Brown.
Mohammed, London, UK
The same Labour Party that made the pre-election promise of a referrendum on the EU constitution, a promise broken so arrogantly in the first few days after Brown took power, now promises to back the U.S. to the hilt in Iraq.
I doubt the Americans will be stupid enough to believe anything he says.
Michael, Brighton, England
Has it occurred to Gordon Brown that George Bush and his cronies are the cause of much international terrorism rather than leaders in the fight against it?
Peter Berman, Wiveliscombe,
Murph,
I wish FDR was still around - a time when the UK/US were able to provide mutual assistance, rather than the present situation where we are lending help in Iraq but get nothing back on climate change, for example.
Jimbob, London,
Good to see that Brown understands the importance of sticking by friends in good times and bad. Not something that every country does.
Alan Turner, London, UK
The thing about Churchill is that he had backbone, even when heavily indebted to America, he still maintained an independent stance.
Mark, Newcastle.,
Perhaps the destinies of the two nations are linked but when the junior partner in the relationship is bound to the whims, fantasies and lies of a President who, if not having lost touch with reality altogether, bases his international and military policies on an agenda which is far from clear the outcome for the minor partner can only be disastrous. I should add that the prime loyalty of any British Prime Minister should be to his country, its interests and above all it's people. I know of no greater political betrayal than when such a Prime Minister is willing to subordinate the responsibility that he was given to the interests of a foreign power.
Tony Harding, Aude, France
Does the "joint inheritance" with the United States include the fact that they were formed by telling the Britsh government and its immoral taxation policy to take a hike? How can a man who steals people's pension money for a living ever compare himself with that kind of political track record?
If you want a realistic comparison, contrast US history with the alacrity with which our politicians are busy signing up for more control freakery and expense from Brussels. On the other hand, if we give away enough power to Brussels the troops will depart Iraq as quickly as they can be loaded onto the first available transport.
I think Murph's got it right - never trust what they say, just hide your wallet and pray!
KR, Stockport,
Mr Brown I thought you were made of sturdier stuff. Why is the whole world so unwilling to stand up to the United States?
Amie Rogers, Newport, Shropshire
Here we go! Its a case of kiss our butts while hes here. Then flip us off when he gets home.
I wish Churchill was still around. Then there would'nt be any talk of a withdrawal and...the Queen's airplane wouldn't have to do double duty as a tanker!
Murph, Madisonville, USA/KY
Did I just here the captain of the Titanic say "full steam ahead"?
D. Stanley, Gourge, France