David Rose
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
The Health Secretary has approved plans to close “vital” hospital services, which will cost lives, an MP has said.
A long-running review of NHS services in Greater Manchester and Cheshire ended yesterday with Alan Johnson’s endorsement of an independent panel’s recommendation to close maternity units at Fairfield in Bury, Rochdale Infirmary, Trafford and Salford Hope. Salford will also lose its neonatal intensive-care unit.
The Independent Reconfiguration Panel has also backed plans to down-grade Rochdale’s accident and emergency unit and end emergency surgery at Fairfield Hospital.
The changes are expected to happen within five years and are likely to mean more home births and deliveries in units staffed by midwives.
Paul Rowen, the Liberal Democrat MP for Rochdale, accused Mr Johnson yesterday of “wielding the axe” in Greater Manchester in a cost-cutting exercise. Tens of thousands of people had signed a petition against the closure of the hospital’s maternity unit, he said. “I am furious that we have been ignored.”
The reconfiguration panel said that local NHS trusts should consider creating stand-alone midwife-led units at Bury, Salford and Trafford. But the Royal College of Midwives said that midwifery staff might not cope with the work demands.
Margaret Morris, chairwoman of Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, said that she was bitterly disappointed. “While we have always supported the principle of having fewer, larger maternity units and developing three major neonatal units, we believed that Greater Manchester would benefit more by retaining and developing services at Salford Royal,” she said.
Ministers defended the changes. Hazel Blears, the Communities Secretary and MP for Salford, said that she was “very pleased” that her constituency was in line to have a stand-alone midwife-led unit.
In December Ms Blears joined picket lines to protest over proposals to close the maternity unit at Hope Hospital, despite supporting the national policy on maternity changes. She said yesterday: “As a local MP I have made representations at every stage to ensure that babies can still be born in Salford, and this is still the case.”
The Department of Health said that the changes to the region’s emergency services would be supported by investment of £38 million. An additional £60 million will be invested in maternity, the department added.
Andrew Lansley, the Conservative Shadow Health Secretary, called on the Government to put the hospital cuts on hold until it could “produce the evidence to justify them”. He said: “These cuts have been justified on the basis of what are safe staffing levels, but in other areas similar-sized units are allegedly under no threat.”
Doctors said yesterday that the changes could save up to 30 babies a year, while NHS managers denied cost-cutting, saying that new services would require more investment, not less.
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool/Teeside
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Not much of a happy medium, for the ones that count in this matter and that's Mum and Baby-to-be! Closing Maternity units on paper, can only be to the department for Mum and Baby-to-be, unless every known back-up alternative services are known and implemented for Mummy-to-be!
Charles Linskaill, Edinburgh, UK
This is an expected outcome of one of the most absurd and short-sighted strategies being deployed by the NHS, namely the increasing reliance on para-medical staff vis-a-vis trained medical doctors. Somewhere along the line, the senior management executives in NHS have started believing the myth that the extensive, comprehensive and rigorous training received by doctors is somehow unnecessary for the management of routive medical problems. They seem to have come to accept (or are trying to portray so) that medicine can be practiced even by those lacking the comprehensive expertise possesed by a doctor. The recent changes in NHS giving more authority to para-medical staff regarding patient management and the mistaken belief that such changes are without any risk will (or have) eventually lead to a state where the paramedics will become directly responsible for a patient's life and that's when the whole system will collapse, because they just know a fraction of what the doctors do!
Angel , Cambridge,
An enlaged population, the number of pensioners increasing each year because they are living longer, and hospital services being reduced. A correspondent asks where is his money going.
His money, and everybody else's is going towards paying the vast amount required by the government to pay its retired civil servants pensions. It was reported last week that the money that will be required in the future is a staggeringly mind blowing amount that will not be produced by taxation unless the increases are so great that they will bankrupt everyone. Gordon had better get his bean counters working on his next ten year plan for the proletariat. It will get to the point where people will be emigrating to Russia to get away from Stalinist thinking !
Phil de Buquet, Newport, England
Will any of the labour politician opt to deliver their babies in these stand alone midwifery led units which are going to be far far way from any immediate medical help.
I seriously doubt so.
Yogi, Manchester, England
No doubt Alan "postman pat", will not make his constituents suffer the same indignity. Will he sleep at night when the first deaths occur in direct response to these cuts?
roger , york,
How with an aging and increasing population with double the money going in are we cutting services, where the hell is all my money going?. We have cancer death rates worse than eatern europe for gods sake.I would imagine its all being spent on useless tiers of management which should be unnecasary in any sane world.As soon as I can afford it im going private because the NHS is bad for your health these days.
mitch, wolverhampton, England
This is a perfect example of why we should not have a monolithic NHS regulated and run by the State. In Brent a "midwife led unit", (a.k.a. "an obstetrician-free zone") is due to close after 3 years because people prefer to go to the Consultant-led unit ("obstetrician and midwife zone" ). My wife is expecting and we are lucky as the midwife led unit is just on another floor. If it were in another building we would not use it.
If we had a State-regulated but pluralistic insurance based healthcare system, as in Switzerland, people could chose which provider gave them the right balance for their needs. This would avoid the Stalinist "all or nothing" "like it or lump it" authoritarian nightmare you now see happening in Manchester and across the country.
People are paying for their healthcare yet they are being denied a choice due to a failed political dogma. All the major parties are incapable of sorting this.
I am tempted to start a Libertarian Party so we have a chance of fixing it.
Roger Thornhill, London,
Stand alone birthing units increase the risk of death to mum and babe. NICE wrote a report to this effect and were asked by the Department of Health to change the wording in this report before it was published. WHY WHY????? I know that staffing levels are an issue plus when things go wrong is there sufficient Ambulance cover!!!!!! I would definately not have my baby in a birthing unit. This is a retrograde step. This is a cost cutting excersise!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kate, Lancashire,