Michael Smith
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
The RAF is to lose a quarter of its frontline bomber force and two bases in new cuts to be pushed through by the Treasury, according to senior defence sources.
Two squadrons of Tornado GR4 ground attack aircraft will be scrapped, cutting the RAF’s frontline squadrons from eight to six. One helicopter base and one training base will also be closed, with the land sold off to raise cash.
The move comes as the Royal Navy is braced for big cuts to its surface fleet with all four Type22 frigates and a destroyer set to be axed “as soon as possible”. Other ships are under threat.
An internal e-mail leaked last month said that the “poor” deal for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) from the government’s Comprehensive Spending Review meant the loss of five ships by April.
Although the MoD has been promised a 1.5% increase in real terms in its budget over the next three years, the cost of future projects such as two new aircraft carriers is forcing it to make cuts elsewhere.
The sources said the MoD “equipment plan” for 2008 – which details all planned purchases – was rejected last month as too costly, largely as a result of urgently needed kit for troops in Iraq.
The cuts to the RAF come despite an insistence last month by Sir Glenn Torpy, chief of the air staff, that it was already “as lean as it can get”. In 2004 the RAF was forced to cut a quarter of its frontline squadrons, one base and 7,500 personnel.
“The idea of getting rid of two of the very few squadrons capable of providing our troops on the ground with close air support, just as the Tornado is set to go to Afghanistan, is a sign of how stupid these people are,” one senior source said.
The two Tornado GR4 squadrons to be scrapped are expected to be one each from the aircraft’s bases at RAF Marham in Norfolk and RAF Lossiemouth, Morayshire; 13 Squadron, based at Marham, is at present training over Scotland for a deployment to Afghanistan next year.
There are three Tornado GR4 squadrons at each base. A squadron has 12 aircraft with 15 crews and four aircraft held in reserve. The other two frontline ground attack aircraft squadrons are equipped with the ageing Harrier aircraft.
The two bases to be scrapped have not yet been named but it is believed that one of them is Odiham, Hampshire, home of the RAF’s Chinook fleet. It is seen as being the most vulnerable because its prime position within the extended London commuter belt would make its sale highly profitable.
The most likely training base closure would see the end of RAF Linton-on-Ouse in North Yorkshire, with all fast jet training amalgamated at RAF Valley in Anglesey. Linton-on-Ouse was a famous second world war bomber station once commanded by Arthur “Bomber” Harris, head of Bomber Command, and later Group Captain Leonard Cheshire VC, founder of the international charity bearing his name.
Moving its 78 Tucano training aircraft to Anglesey is likely to be unpopular because it will mean increased numbers of low-flying aircraft over Wales, which have always been a serious irritation for local farmers.
The cuts come despite a shortage of fast jet aircraft for operations and a need to limit the hours that each aircraft flies so that the Harrier fleet can stay operational until its replacement in 2017. A lack of long runways has seen the short take-off and landing Harrier providing close air support to British troops in Afghanistan.
John Nichol, the navigator of an RAF Tornado shot down over Iraq during the 1991 Gulf war, said the cuts left the RAF with “a disaster waiting to happen”.
“When we were flying over Iraq during the Gulf war we thought we were being stretched to the absolute limit,” he said. “The men and women flying now are working 100 times harder than we ever had to do. They are asked to do far more with far less.
“The military are their worst enemies. Their can-do attitude means they will always strive to do the job regardless of the resources the politicians give them. This isa disaster in the making, it really is.”
The cuts are not the RAF’s only problems. The government’s deal to sell 75 Typhoon aircraft to Saudi Arabia and the decision to use the new Typhoon aircraft in Afghanistan mean that some Tornado F3 fighters will have to stay in service for another eight years.
The F3 was due to be scrapped next year and replaced by the Typhoon – formerly known as the Eurofighter. But the controversial al-Salam deal with Riyadh will mean that there are insufficient aircraft to cover Britain’s air defences. Consequently, the F3 will stay in service till 2015.
An MoD spokesman said talk of cuts to the RAF and Royal Navy were part of an initial phase of discussions ahead of next year’s planning round and no firm decisions had been taken.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I think John Nicholl's observation that the Military are their own worst enemy here, is the key to why successive Governments since 1990 have, initially on the back of "Options for Change" continued to apply evermore Defence cuts. It's happened because the Armed Forces will stretch, improvise and accept ever increasing unpopular tours of duty simply to make it work. However, in time to come the machine will break down, but by that time, it will not be quite clear who to blame? the poiticians will blame the military for not being able to cope with what will at the time appear to be a single minor cut in what will by then be a a very tiny budget, while the Military Chiefs will be left trying to explain that it's the culmination of endless cuts over the decades which will have brought all to the end of their tether, man and machine alike!
Ian Smith Watson, Borehamwood, HERTFORDSHIRE
Sadly, there will be capacity at RAF Valley once the Hawk T1s are retired and the TWENTY EIGHT new generation Hawks replace them.
Tim, Leeds,
Gordon really is cutting off his nose to spite his face here.
We all know he's upset for being indecisive, but taking it out on the MoD shows his true colours. A sad, sad leader indeed.
Owen Patterson, London,
I do not believe what i have just read regarding the cuts to the Navy and Raf, they are both overstretched as it is now! As an ex raf sac i cannot see how this government can possibly cut more and more and still expect these forces to do their work efficently. Moving all training to Valley is lunacy the control towers won't be able to cope let alone the public of Anglesey they no doubt moan about the amount of flying now.
Richard Wills, Bristol, England
The closing of Linton and moving the Tucanos to Valley is a stupid idea. There is not the capacity at Valley for a further 75 aircraft to operate an extensive flying programme with the Hawks that are there all ready. Both basic and advanced flying training will suffer. Where will the personnel come from to maintain the Tucanos as they are operated by contractors and there are no RAF personnel available to magically relocate at Valley with out major disturbance to the pilots training? Then there is the scheduled maintenance - where will that be carried out? Are they to leave that at Linton? Then why move in the first place as no savings are effectively made and you only end up with a demoralised RAF and have more people out of the aerospace industry on which to draw the required skills from in the future. The Forces are lean enough and hurting already. If you want to save money - sack a few under performing politicians for a change and start with the main ones at the top.
Billie Wood, York, Yorkshire
Brown will announce a Comprehensive Spending Review which is nothing of the sort. The Armed Forces have been used to make the positive news stories of two new Carriers, a new nuclear deterrent and extra protected vehicles for the army but none of this has been funded by extra money. They will deny it but the 4 year defence budget is left with a £18 Billion hole in it. Spending based on % of GDP has continued to fall. This will mean massive cuts elsewhere. The Treasury is not even paying for the all extra costs of this Governments wars.
Pete Young, London, UK
Have this government got an ounce of of common sense or intelligence between them. They are bringing this country to its knees. In Iraq, a war which was politician led, planning was never a consideration. it has cost the country in both Men & Machines and World regard without any gain and now they are putting more pressure on the Military, again without forward planning by cutting the Defence budget.
I'm afraid these Politicians are NOT living in the real world. There is always someone ready to attack when your guard is down - as now with this country. I am a realist and believe that the World has become a more dangerous place, one where defence has to be maintained. The days of the Superpowers are not over, but the days of Great Britain as one will be if this Government is allowed drop our guard.
Bob Brevitt, Walsall, UK
Why is this not being challenged by the Conservatives.
Like the Police pay issue, Labour are high on platitudes but low on support....
Terry WHEELER, Southend , UK
If the government goes ahead with this, it is adding insult to injury. This government has already left our forces overstretched. We need to support the brave men and women of our armed forces and should be expanding (rather than slimming down) our services to provide them with the proper resources that they require.
C Bird, Seoul, S Korea
They know the cost of everything and the value of nothing
JJ Adams - Ex WRAF, Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany