Sam Coates
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today
All children would be expected to pass reading tests at the age of 6 under a Conservative government, David Cameron will announce tomorrow.
The party would scrap the Key Stage 1 English exam for children aged 6 and 7 and replace it with a reading test that all children, other than those with severe learning disabilities, would be required to pass. Children would be taught reading by extending the use of “synthetic phonics”, which focuses on teaching the sounds that make up words. Those who failed the new test would be given extra attention, but a Tory spokesman said that it was not intended to make pupils repeat a year.
The announcement has been criticised by teachers’ leaders for being too demanding. The National Primary Headteachers’ Association criticised the move towards a reading test at the end of Year One. Chris Davis, a spokesman for the group, said: “It flies in the face of international evidence that suggests children do better if they start formal education later on.”
Steve Sinnott, general-secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said that synthetic phonics was useful but that the Tories were obsessed with it.
The Conservatives point to figures which show that, after seven years of primary education, one in five children is still struggling with literacy, increasing to 40 per cent among pupils eligible for free school meals.
Michael Gove, the Shadow Children’s Secretary, said that children of high ability from poor backgrounds were overtaken by children of lower ability from richer backgrounds at primary school. The gap widened as they passed through the system.
“The primary aim will be to make opportunity more equal,” he said. Ed Balls, the Schools Secretary, said that the national curriculum advocated systematic phonics, and Ofsted has agreed to this being implemented. Mr Davis said that the emphasis on teaching reading skills to children as young as six contrasted with the situation in many countries in Europe, where such skills are taught at a much later age. He said evidence suggested that children who learn to read later catch up and overtake early starters.
“The key thing is that they start formal work later. The evidence suggests that if children start at four that is fine, as long as the first couple of years is focused on structured play.”
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
After teaching for 24 years in the junior section I must say that synthetic phonics definately works. The students' vocabulary continues to grow and they have no problems spelling words even in later stages of school life. The students start reading at the age of 4 years and I feel that is the perfect age. If it is left for later, then it becomes difficult for the child to cope with other requirements of 5+ level where they need to read instructions, or do exercises of vocabulary usage, rhyming words etc in English. Doing oral work and structured play is fine but for all the hours of school time??!! No wonder discipline is becoming such a problem in schools. In olden days thee was a seriousness attatched to the school atmosphere, with playway methods now, the children feel school is for playing and interacting with friends only. Why is teaching becoming a political issue? Why can it not be left to the professionals who adapt themselves to the times and the needs of the students???
Mrs Poonam M. Thapa, Mombasa, Kenya
perhaps the reason that david cameron and co. have become obsessed by "synthetic phonics" is that they have been subjected to very skilful lobbying, and a tremendous publicity
campaign. there is insufficient evidence to warrant the imposition of "synthetic phonics" on a nationwide scale. it is a very expensive international system, certainly not flexible enough to deal with the wide variety of english pronunciation....a scottish child and a london child will pronounce the double oo in wood and moon differently, and to the london child, "been " should be spelt b-i-n. it is not difficult to find hundreds of such examples
léo burton, 22220 trédarzec, bretagne france
Back in the olden days we did have reading tests - we had to queue up to read to the teacher in order to progress to the next page. Have the Tories considered the logistical problems of imposing such a system? And the cost? I think that it's about time that politicians let teachers get on with their jobs. I suppose the interference stems from the fact that these people have nothing better to do with their time - and of course, the devil makes work for idle hands.
Bill Q, Derby,