The best green revolution for this traitor is to throw him into a pond covered in green algae where he will be very much at home - pond life with with pond life.

Charles Crosby, anytown, UK

A 'Green Homes Service hotline' - More jobs for gasbags and more hot air from Brown.

Jerry, Southampton,

Not that it bothers me. I am still to be convinced that the whole of the Global Warming warning is another excuse to boost tax revenues.


However, regardless of my view, one thing needs to be blarified by Brown. He claims that "The Prime Minister promised to cut Britain's carbon dioxide emissions by at least 60 per cent by 2050". Does the 60% refer to levels on CO2 emmissions in 2007 or the projected levels of 2050?

The point is hugley important, since, if the latter is true then Brown is using smoke and mirrors again to hide announce a smaller increase as a "cut".

Edwin Thornber, Bucharest,

I would rather Mr Brown tackle the problems of today rather than talking about 2050 - its all a convienent smoke screen. The goverment must love 'the enviroment issue' coupled with the 'war on terror' they can avoid having to talk about real issues.

Steve F, Bognor Regis, West Sussex

If the PM was serious about reducing global warming then why does he not push for all food to be organic? The Stern Report, on which he bases the need to reduce mans effect, clearly stated that modern agriculture contributes 26% to global warming with the majority of that due to the chemicals poured on the land - nitrates in particular. This is a substantial percentage and if man was responsible for the climate change then action should be taken.

Michael Henry, Bournemouth,

Jaw, jaw, jaw. More hot air from an idealogically bankrupt pol.

"The Prime Minister promised to cut Britain's carbon dioxide emissions by at least 60 per cent by 2050. He then went further, promising to consider reducing them by as much as 80 per cent...." Really? All by himself, is this?

Gordon Brown will be an active politician for, perhaps, another five-to-ten years. Based on his and his party's record, during that time, they will achieve precisely nothing positive and nothing of importance on a global scale.

Assuming the man does believe even a portion of what he says (and, yes, I'm aware of the proportions of that assumption), can we also count on him to single-handedly turn back any rogue comets that threaten our existence over the next forty years?

John Blackley, Austin, Tx, USA

There are several million homes currently burning fossil fuels to produce their hot water needs.They cannot afford to spend Three t o four thousand pounds 0on solar panel installation which would save thousands of tons of carbon gas`emission

The government has carried out an aerial survey of all homes in England and Wales and is aware of the emission and will have to to provide adequate finance to home owners if they are to tackle this problem.The present allowance is totally inadequate

Alex Pomeroy , London,

Mr Brown needs educate his MPs.

An Inquiry is currently under way into the need for a new road in south Dorset. The County council admit that it will pump an additional 2500 tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere, but the MP for South Dorset suggests that it will 'form the centrepiece of a sustainable transport scheme.'

That, plus Ruth Kelly's comments on the Andrew Marr show, indicate just how much Gordon has to do if he is to earn his green spurs.

John, Dorset,

A green revolution presaged by the departure of a Brown one sounds good to me!

philip, Ipswich,