Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

Labour is facing questions on whether a series of donations amounting to more than £380,000 breached the law by using intermediaries to shield the identity of a major donor.
David Abrahams, a wealthy property developer, yesterday admitted he used “friends and colleagues” to give substantial sums to Labour over four years in order to avoid publicity.
The episode threatens to reignite the controversy over donations to Labour after the year-long police inquiry into whether the party sold peerages to wealthy supporters, which ended with no charges being brought but cost millions of pounds.
In a bizarre twist one of the people Mr Abrahams used was a jobbing builder who so dislikes politics he does not even vote. The other was a woman who works for him. Both are of modest means.
Around two thirds of the sum that was donated – a total of £222,000 – was given to Labour in the six months since Gordon Brown entered Downing Street as Prime Minister, making Mr Abrahams Labour's third largest donor over that period, behind Lord Sainsbury of Turville and Anglo-Iranian businessman Mahmoud Khayami.
The Electoral Commission demanded an explanation as Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, admitted the donations were “plainly not transparent”.
“Whether these arrangements are within the letter of the law they are plainly not transparent. I am concerned about them,” he said “I shall ask both the Electoral Commission and my officials for immediate advice on what action should be taken.”
Labour began an inquiry to check whether the donations complied with the law requiring that gifts to political parties over a modest amount are fully declared. Donations made via third parties are illegal unless the person behind the donation is also declared or there is a “reasonable excuse”.
The Conservatives said that the revelation raised questions about what checks Labour carries out on donations it receives and contrasted the bizarre episode with Mr Brown’s promise to usher in a new type of politics. Mr Abrahams, 53, who owns a string of property firms in Newcastle, was forced to admit his donations after it emerged that a builder, Ray Ruddick, 55, who drives a Transit van and lives in an ex-council house, was registered as having given £196,850 to Labour since 2003.
Mr Ruddick, who is a director of several of Mr Abrahams’ property companies, initially denied ever having made donations to Labour, saying he “couldn’t stand the party nor any politicians” when he was approached over the weekend. He later said that he had given some money to Labour.
Yesterday, Mr Ruddick laughed off the row and declared he was off to play bingo. Wearing a tatty brown fleece jacket and carrying an armful of newspapers, he told reporters: “I have got nothing more to say about the Labour party donations apart from that today I’m off to the bingo to try and win the kind of money they say I have. Then I’ll be able to make the kind of donations they say I have too.”
Janet Kidd, 56, who works as a secretary for Mr Abrahams and is also a director of some of his companies, is also registered as having given £185,000 to Labour over a similar period. She lives in a modest, semi-detached home in Gateshead, Two of their donations, each of £80,000, were made on the same day in July shortly after Mr Brown became Prime Minister. The combined total of the donations is £381,850 over four years.Mr Abrahams insisted he had done nothing wrong but said that, as a “private person”, he did not want to attract publicity by making donations in his own name.
He said: “I’m a member of the Labour Party and have been for about 40 years, since I was 15. I have always been fortunate enough to be able to make substantial donations to several charitable organisations as well as to the Labour Party for a number of years.
“But I am a very private person and I did not want to seek publicity. I gifted money to my friends and colleagues so they could make perfectly legal donations on my behalf. Donors to the Labour Party get a lot of publicity and I did not want that.”
Mr Abrahams has strong links to the Labour Party in the North East of England. He served as a Labour councillor in Tyne and Wear and his late father, Bennie Abrahams, was Lord Mayor of Newcastle. Mr Abrahams was in the front row when Tony Blair made a speech to local Labour party figures in his former Sedgefield constituency in June announcing his decision to stand down and quit Parliament.
He was selected to stand as a parliamentary candidate for Labour in Rich-mond, North Yorkshire, against William Hague in 1992 but was deselected after a gruelling series of rows with the local Labour party over his personal life and business interests. There were claims that he had presented himself as a married man with a young son when, in fact, he was single. He blamed the row on a smear campaign.
The Electoral Commission said that it was too early to comment on what action it might take, and said only: “We are contacting the Labour Party and asking them for an explanation about the circumstances of these particular donations.”
However, Chris Grayling, a prominent member of the Shadow Cabinet, said: “This whole affair raises a series of serious questions about the level of scrutiny that the Labour Party carries out into the donations in receives. All of this is hardly consistent with the new politics that Gordon Brown promised us.”
The law
- It is a criminal offence to give money to a political party via an intermediary, or “agent”, unless details of the original donor are declared too
- The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act, passed in 2000 to force all political donations above £5,000 to be declared, says that the party receiving the money must be told who it originally came from
- The Act says in section 54 that “where any person [the agent] causes an amount to be received by way of a donation on behalf of another person . . . the agent must ensure that, at the time when the donation is received by the party, the party is given all such details in respect of the donors as are required . . . to be given in respect of the donor of a recordable donation.” It continues: “A person commits an offence if, without reasonable excuse, he fails to comply . . .” Under schedule 20, such an offence is punishable by up to a year in prison or an unlimited fine or, if a case is heard in a magistrates court, six months in jail or a fine up to £5,000.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
i have rented houses from mr martins in the past,, and become a good friend, and i've found him as nothing but a proffesional gent,, his reasoning for donating cash i believe comes from a long line of loyalty to parties who will make the country/region a better place,, he certainly doesn't need any favors regarding money....
m-j..
michael jay, le mans, france
Having read the article, it would have been a bit more magnanimous and impressive if The Times and the journalist who wrote the article had at least allowed themselves to make a reference (a tribute would be too much to ask) to The Mail on Sunday having first broken the story.
richard borley, Cheddar, Somerset
You don't really think the Brown Broadcasting Corportaion's going to cover this, do you? They're far too busy presenting the trashing Brown's been getting at PMQs as a resounding triumph.
John Lynch, Whittington, UK
How would a property developer benefit from making donations to the Labour party ? Actually...
roger, london,
Once again we hear of suspect donations given to a Political Party! Maybe someone will explain:- What's the difference between this method of funding/sponsorship than funding The Labour Party got/get from a certain large Union, allegedly made up of money, extracted ( to this day,) off a certain section, of its Union membership, (from a certain area,) who had, (but unbeknown to the duped member/s,) allegedly been Excluded/Disenfranchased... Yes..Excluded/Disenfranchised because; from documents secured, (mostly of late,) it's revealed that crucial Agreements/evidence vital to every affected Union member/s right of action, (from that certain area,) had been concealed/suppressed from those affected member/s allegedly for many years! Allegedly depriving those member/s of fiscal/pension entitlements, in employ also out of employ...Certain MP's, relevant Authorities were informed of the alleged dishonesty, suspect funding/sponsoring from that certain Union, Yet.. NO INVESTIGATION...WHY?
Stan The Man, Lincolnshire, England
This whole affair stinks - just like everything else that is to do with New Labour !
Thelma H, essex,
Politicians and their doners don't seem to have learned anything from Donations for peerage scandal. This is just another blatant corruption that is now so rife in Britain.
philip Ingram, LONDON, UK
How extraordinary that a man who's canny enough to make so much money that he can afford to give away £380,000 of it should not have been intimate with the rules related to political donations. How extraordinary that that people accepting the donations didn't investigate their source thoroughly and explain the rules to the donor. It's almost beyond belief! Why, it's almost as though they knew they were...no, no - perish the thought. It must just be me being cynical again.
Jacques Francis, Westcott,
So ..
Mr Abrahams has enough brains to be a property tycoon but not enough to know he's doing wrong by using other peoples ID's in this way ???
Makes you wonder about how and where he's doing business and if any of its funded from the public purse.....
TJW, Brighton,
Was the 40% gift tax paid ?
Robert, Luton,
If he didn't think it was illegal, immoral or otherwise dodgy, why do it via third party/parties instead of simply anonymously? Okay, the details would eventually be published but what was he trying to hide by using another person's name?
Jet McLazer, Aberdeen, UK
Where any of the recipients of Mr Abrahams' on means tested benefits ? I assume their benefits would have to be stopped while they had savings of over the limit. I trust that they will be paying back with interest any such benefits obtained by fraud.
Robert, Luton,
"claimed that he had no idea he was doing anything wrong"
If I remember correctly, ignorance of the law is not an acceptable defence.
Step down, Mr Brown (PM by default), your governement is clearly incompetent, and appears corrupt as well.
W Smith, Oldham,
The wave of corruption that swept through Downing Street while Tony Blair was in office is now turning into a tsunami. New Labour stinks. It has no morals, no conscience and no integrity,. They seem to positively enjoy breaking the rules, deceiving the electorate and plumping up their bank accounts while families are grieving over husbands, fathers and sons lost in illegal wars, while pensioners can't afford to pay electricity bills, while patients die in dirty hospitals, while Northern Rock customers lose their life savings and while innocent youngsters are knifed to death on city streets. What a wonderful legacy for New Labour.
caroline kennedy, San Jose, Costa Rica
I don't see what is wrong with it. No one has to identify themselves as a donor to anyone. The tax issue is a red herring - if he has already paid tax on the money he gives away it's up to the person who receives it to declare it, not him. It's not like he's paying millions in bribes to the Saudis while simultaneously setting up hospital building contracts for his son, is it. Or have we all forgotten the barefaced corruption of the eighties?
eric campbell, harrogate , uk
Since when has ignorance of the law become a defense?
Obviously this property developer has nothing to gain from donating so much money to a political party that has committed to building 3 million new homes in the UK by 2020.
James, Salisbury, Uk
What has happened IS illegal but we all know that nobody will be punished; this is the state of Britain today.
How can we expect our youth to conform when our leaders are so corrupt in their dealings.
Corruption in Britain and European Institutions is rife. Yet again, auditors refuse to sign off the accounts of the EEC because of the missing £Billions. Fat cat expenses especially in Government. No adequate control systems to check them. Mr Brown said we had seen an end to all of this. The first politician to announce a major CLEAN UP in the way that our money is spent, will get my vote.
MP's where ever they are, should be squeaky clean in what they claim for. Expenses should only be paid where they are strictly required to allow an individual MP to carry out his duty to the people of this country. Is it too much to ask that those that are elected to serve us are clearly controlled in what they spend. If we cut out all their "JOLLIES" abroad, think of the saving in carbon emissions.
ormes, TAUNTON, Somerset
I wonder what HMRC will have to say to people who can donate so much that isn't shown on their tax returns ?
Paul Greenwood, Worcester,
Aren't people supposed to pay tax on gifts they give to other people?
So its fraud too?
Jane Middleton, London,
There goes Abraham's peerage.
R Bingham, Lauzun, France
Well know your enemy as they say.
H Adams, London,
What's happened to the BBC's coverage? There one moment, gone the next.
Phil Payne, Sheffield,
Coming out of the woodwork now aren't they?
judy, Liverpool, england