Mark Henderson, Science Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Gordon Brown should approve a new generation of nuclear power stations immediately and give active government backing to genetically modified crops, the departing chief scientist will say today.
Professor Sir David King, who steps down as the Government’s chief scientific adviser next month, will use his valedictory speech to urge the Prime Minister to support both controversial technologies. A day after Mr Brown told business leaders that nuclear power has a role to play in Britain’s energy future, Sir David will say that the time is already right to give the go-ahead to new atomic plants.
He will infuriate green activists further, many of whom oppose nuclear power, by suggesting that ministers should abandon their official neutrality on agricultural biotechnology and campaign actively for the development of GM crops.
He believes that nuclear power is essential if Britain is to make significant cuts to greenhouse gas emissions.
“Alternative technologies and energy-efficiency gains will certainly help the UK to achieve our target of reducing emissions by 60 per cent by 2050,” he will tell the Foundation for Science and Technology. “But we will also need to look at other low-emission ways of making energy. It is now the time to give the green light to nuclear energy. While I have high hopes for new zero-emissions technologies in the future, efficient nuclear-fission power stations are already available. I am also hopeful that fusion power stations, without the problems of nuclear-waste disposal, will emerge over the coming three or four decades.”
The chief scientist, who was appointed by Tony Blair in 2000, says that GM crops should play an important part in Britain’s agricultural future, despite public misgivings about their likely environmental effects.
Sir David has long been known to support GM crops and nuclear power, but this will be the first time that he has asked ministers to take explicit action on these issues. His successor is Professor John Beddington, a population biologist from Imperial College, London.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
There is saying although I do not known the author
'Genetic Engineering transfer is many things, but it is not sex'. it would seem that people in power have forgotton it . But the main thing is that the British people have been betrayal and also the attempts to silence scientists whose research indicates possible human health problems from GM crops. We all should be writing to our MP and MEP and at the same time support Soil Assocation and Friends of the Earth.
Charles Woodbridge, Huddersfield, UK
Why such a push to support Genetically Modified crops?
What's wrong with the Genetics that nature created, it's done the trick for 1000's of years?
We have no idea how Genetically modifying our food will affect ourselves or nature 50 years in the future.
I cant help but think there is somthing sinister about this, the way we cant know if our food is GM modified and the the recomendation that the goverement should be activly supporting it. WHY? It's a private sector that the goverremnt shouldn't really have anything to do with apart from making sure it's 100% good for public health.
As said before, we know hardly anything about DNA and how modifying it will affect us in the future.
What about modifing the DNA of animals to sort out different problems?
Or modifying human DNA, how will this affect people having children, and there children etc.
Bob, England,
A double pronged attempt to destroy the human race. People would be horrified if they knew how little our scientists understand about genetics, we are roughly at the stage of stone-age children playing with fire. As for nuclear power, we need to develop forms that do not threaten life when they make the inevitable bid for freedom. We already have suffered too many radioactive releases and the more we adopt nuclear power the more frequent, and worse, such releases are going to be.
Mike Poulsen, Reading, Berkshire
The personal views of Sir David concerning the release of GM material into our fragile environment continue to be out of step with most scientists, as well as the wishes of 95% of the UK population.
The risk of GM contamination is high - especially in view of the problems that we already have containing conventional pathogenic material in laboratories. And rising energy costs will compound any mitigation measures that we might have had in place for dealing with problems caused by unforeseen GM 'accidents'.
We have been abusing our planet for over 200 years. It's now time to take stock and restore sustainability -- before unleashing yet another assault on the natural world.
Steve Rawlings, Chepstow, Wales
Sir, is a disappointment to see GB with all these opportunityâs, regarding renewable energy sources, waiting to be exploited such as wind, solar and why not tidal sources being abounded and have your PM choosing as a source the Atomic Power which is also a possible an atomic bomb hit in the possibility of a war or terrorist attack, shall we expect more Big Brother activities as the risks increase? GB do not forget smaller countries waiting for your example to follow as they look up on you.., As about the GM crops, do not mean to be too conservative but were the human DNA is going too, do not you think that people should be careful for our childrenâs future?
Angelos Kontos, Corfu, Greece
Thank goodness for some common sense at last.
If only he had tried harder, sooner.
We are now faced with pulling this issue back from the brink of 'green' madness.
Terry Joslin, Didcot, UK
A double pronged attempt to destroy the human race. People would be horrified if they knew how little our scientists understand about genetics, we are roughly at the stage of stone-age children playing with fire. As for nuclear power, we need to develop forms that do not threaten life when they make the inevitable bid for freedom. We already have suffered too many radioactive releases and the more we adopt nuclear power the more frequent, and worse, such releases are going to be.
Mike Poulsen, Reading, Berkshire