David Rose
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Cancer treatment in Britain is lagging behind the rest of Europe, with a huge postcode lottery on getting the right drugs or therapies to patients who need them, the Government admits.
A five-year plan for the future of cancer services is to be unveiled by the Health Secretary on Monday, which will aim to overhaul care for patients on the NHS and set out expansion of screening programmes and a focus on “survivorship” as more patients go into remission.
But a draft of the new cancer reform strategy, seen by The Times, admits for the first time that Britain has poor survival rates compared with Western Europe, the US and Canada and that patients are waiting too long for both radiotherapy and chemotherapy for the most common cancers.
Doctors will be given “essential” orders to increase the number of radiotherapy doses amid evidence that only half the required number of treatments are being delivered.
However, there will be no extra funding to deliver more services or to address widespread health inequalities. Instead, money to improve diagnosis and treatment will have to be found through efficiency savings.
One in four deaths in England is now attributable to cancer, but survival rates are improving to the extent that there are one million people living with cancer in England alone.
While Britain spends more than any other European nation on cancer care, access to new drugs is relatively slow, and those that are approved for use on the NHS are still being refused to patients in some areas.
Important reports have cautioned that staff shortages and lack of equipment are leading to long waiting lists in radiotherapy — where radiation is used to shrink solid tumours — and could be cutting the chances of patient survival. Breast cancer patients are waiting three months for therapy, despite evidence of a 60 per cent risk of the disease returning if they are not treated within eight weeks.
In the document, Mike Richards, the National Director for Cancer Services, notes: “Good progress [on survival rates] over past ten years, but much more to be done.”
The strategy will highlight how there has been little progress on some cancers, such as lung and pancreas, and that major inequalities remain in death rates between rich and poor.
The NHS has tripled spending on cancer since the introduction of the Government’s last cancer plan in 2000. But spending also varies greatly around the country, with some primary care trusts spending £40 per patient and others £140.
Some of the strategies have already been announced, pilot programmes to screen 47-year-old women for breast cancer, lowering the starting age from 50. Screening for bowel cancer will be extended to age 75, rather than 70.
Ministers are expected to highlight the need to raise awareness of lifestyle factors associated with cancer, such as smoking and overexposure to the sun.
Professor Richards also calls for faster access to new cancer drugs by letting the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence consider treatments for use on the NHS at the same time as they are applying for licenses in general. Doctors will also be urged to provide more “emotional” support for long-term sufferers.
Karol Sikora, former head of the cancer programme at the World Health Organisation, said that Britain was a world leader in treatment for rarer forms of cancer but was “let down” by long-term and short-term survival rates for the most common kinds: lung, breast and colon cancer.
He suggested a lot of the extra money had gone towards salaries for people who never dealt with patients. “We have funded managers to deal with targets while in France, Germany and Italy that bureaucracy just does not exist,” he said. “It is clear that the NHS cannot afford to spend any more on treating cancer, the drive now is towards equity and efficiency.
“We need to provide a far more customer-focused service as close to people’s homes as possible. Better organisation and new models of working which involve the independent sector would bring about a revolution for future patients and save lives.”
The NHS delivers 1.5 million courses of radiotherapy treatment every year, when the ideal would be at least 2.5 million, according to the Royal College of Radiologists.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Why can't the patient be given an opportunity to top up the fund's allocated for cancer drug's.For instance , if the present course cost's ten thousand pounds and the new and more effective course cost's fifteen thousand pound's , why can't a patient be allowed to donate the extra five thousand .
A half way house between private and N.H.S care , thus reducing waiting times increasing primary care and by way of increased use of the drug's , it will also benefit research and developement not only of the next generation of drug's but also the skills of the staff involved, by treating more patient's they will gain valuable experience. To do that , the government would have to admit the N.H.S is not working in it's present format , not a bad place to start.
Nick Dixon, Sutton Coldfield, England
Things are bad, I watched a web cast of a Cancer Conference in the US and was impressed to see the way that imaginative new treatments were being introduced. The US uses its Radiotherapy units to their full potential, in contrast to the UK.
After listening to the impressive Americans, there was speaker from the UK, she said "we now have a new help line for cancer patients and we have printed new pamthlets." It was like a scene from Monty Python and would have made great comedy, if the subject hadn't been so serious. It was embarrassing to watch! I can't believe that our consultants actually think that we get the best treatment here. There seems to be a conspiracy of silence. Some patients should be getting 3 fractions of radiation per day (hit tumours hard) but its not given because trusts don't want to pay the overtime!
The bureaucratic NHS is failing patients so give patients the money so they can go elsewhere!
NHS got a 3.1% rise; consultants got 27%, money pit or what?
Graham Wharton, St Albans, uk
'The Welfare State We're in' by James Bartholomew, suggests the NHS is a marked step down from what preceded it. Well worth a read.
Dave Bartlett, Kingsclere, UK
after 10 years trumpeting how wonderful nhs is; now this tells the real truth
terry sullivan, london, england
HOW TO SAVE 9% COSTS -Early risers.
Discharge by 0930hrs instead of 1630hrs would creat a free bed for the next patient. Incredibly patients can sit around for seven hours waiting for a discharge letter to be typed, and discharge drugs to be dispensed, when it is known the previous day that the patient is to be discharged.
Gut Liam, Hertford, England
As a cancer patient I can say my feet did not touch the ground both on diagnostic events, treatment and follow up.Every appointment kept to the minute save for unforeseens.
I agree with the early riser comment from Gut Liam though that would be marginal in the overall costs.
As far as treatment goes I wonder if there is some unspoken triage happening with no hope cases not having massive resource allocated and high chance cases being worked on hard? Maybe there is some issues of Me Me Me going on here.
"emotional support" I don't think doctors can provide that at all. This is the remit of family and friends, and I can say one certainly finds out lots about human nature from within these happenings, don't expect everyone to stick around!
Tom Taylor-Duxbury, Ludlow, Shropshire
This is a sad situation for a nation that has led Europe and the World in science and medicine for so long.
I have always thought that cancer care, and medical care as a whole, in Britain would be among the best in the world. It seems that British doctors can be found in every glorious and god-foresaken corner of the Earth.
The ever-increasing incidence of cancer in The United States is, apparently, now at epidemic proportions with one in three people expected to become a victim of cancer during his or her lifetime.
This is both scary and astounding! What will the incidence be, both in Britain and in the USA in 10, 20 30 years from now? ?
The medical establishments seem to focus little to no effort or attention on cancer PREVENTION! That is the focus of laymen and fringe/cult health groups that seek to promote better eating and life-style practices through word- of- mouth, the internet and magazine articles. Apparently there is fear of opposing Big Business.
Garth Rex, Glendale Heights, USA