Greg Hurst, Political Correspondent
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Labour was paid £180,000 from public funds to help party officials to understand new funding rules shortly before it began accepting secret donations from a property developer, The Times can reveal.
The party applied for and received a “start-up grant” from the Electoral Commission to meet the costs of abiding by the law on declaring donations that Labour had itself enacted. It was for training staff in the duties imposed by the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 and was specifically for the party to prepare for its requirements on submitting accounts and declaring donations above £5,000.
The grant could also be used to hire consultants to give advice on the Act, for guidance for party officials and volunteers, and to adapt computerised accounting systems.
All parties, from the largest to residents’ groups registered with the commission, were eligible to seek grants after the Act provided for £700,000 in public funds to help them to meet its requirements. Labour received £183,052, the same sum as the Conservatives, under a formula based on votes cast in the 1997 general election and the 1999 European elections. The Liberal Democrats were given £136,840, and minority parties represented at Westminster up to £21,000 each. Small parties, including the Communist Party of Britain, received grants of £500.
The bulk of Labour’s grant was paid in April 2001, the remainder being paid in 2002. In January 2003 Labour registered the first donation of £25,000 from Janet Dunn, wife of a business associate of David Abrahams.
This was the first of 19 disguised gifts made in the names of four intermediaries including his solicitor, John McCarthy, over a four-year period that totalled more than £600,000.
There have been claims that Labour officials helped to set up the arrangement that included the use of legal covenants for Mr Abrahams to gift the donations through intermediaries.
That Labour received substantial public funds to train staff in the new law makes all the more puzzling the insistence by the party’s now-departed general secretary that he thought such an arrangement was legal.
The antisleaze campaigner and former Independent MP Martin Bell told The Times: “The more we know, the worse it gets. It makes you wonder what this money was spent on.”
Peter Watt said when he quit as Labour general secretary last week after admitting he knew of the proxy donations: “I believed at the time my reporting obligations had been appropriately complied with. As a result of press coverage . . . I sought legal advice on behalf of the Labour Party. I was advised that, unbeknown to me, there were additional reporting requirements.” Mr Watt worked for the party when the Act was introduced and was its task-force leader for financial and legal compliance from 2003 and director of finance and compliance in 2005 until he became general secretary last year.
Section 54 of the Act states that if an “agent” is used to give money to a political party the original donor’s identity must be supplied to the party too.
Mr Watt was said yesterday to be ready to fight to clear his name rather than accept the role of fall guy, friends saying he inherited the arrangement when he took over running the party.
Matthew Taylor, who was an adviser to Tony Blair, has accused Gordon Brown of “inept” handling of the row.
Alan Johnson, the Health Secretary, told GMTV: “It’s not a good time for the party . . . particularly as we were the party that set out to regulate this.”

What each party got
Labour Party £183,052
Conservatives £183,052
Liberal Democrats £136,840
SNP £21,991
UKIP £17,579
Greens £16,821
Ulster Unionists £11,062
Plaid Cymru £10,968
SDLP £10,439
Democratic Unionists £8,578
Sinn Fein £7,087
Alliance Party (NI) £3,255
Scottish Socialists £2,992

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I therefore demand a grant to train my team in understanding taxation laws as they are constantly getting more complicated and expensive to implement
john Graham, london, uk
Why worry?
It's only individual's hard-earned money that they have taxed and wasted.........
MarkS, Leeds,
What amuses me in this issue is the disappearance of the political doctrines of Karl Marx, who saw "socialists" and "capitalists" as diametrically opposed to each other. Judging by the issue in question, Marx must have been joking! Here we are with an extremely rich, capitalist businessman lining the pockets of the Labour Party! What is the sense of it:? Can any contributors offer an explanation?
Edmund Burke, Kingston upon Thames, England
Can Labour provide evidence that the money was spent on for the stated purpose?
Did their former secretary general participate in any of these "training sessions"?
How many of the "consultants" that were paid for these services are, or have been, candidates for the Labour Party in elections?
Joe, brussels, belgium
How many underhand scams can our politicians come up with to pilfer from the public purse? Shame on them.
Cromwell, Leeds, England
It gets worse!
What's the betting it was paid for buy lottery funds - still Prime Minister (Crash Gordon) Brown (the Clown), Unelect and New Liebour are a worthy deserving cause aren't they?
Pete Balchin, Solicitor , Bristol, UK
You couldn't make this up...
I dont suppose there any chance that this money will be returned? What absolutely infuriates me in this business is the way none of these politicians have resigned or been suspended. Outside of the political elite ignorance of the law is not a defence nor is having vast sums of money spent educating you on the miriade of laws that have been brought in the norm.
The hypocriscy disgusts me beyond words - "Look at me I'm Nu Labour I can do wrong even when I have but it's ok because I'm trying to build a Utopia that no-one wants but they will when we finish it (just the Dome eh?)."
This Government not only broke the law butthey have now been shown to take tax payers money to educate themselves in how best to do electoral funding. They wrote the law... I mean how much funding is required for someone who wrote the bill to rock up with white-board, felt-tip pen and some hand-outs. It worked for my A-levels then again I guess they werent that important
Marc, Singapore,