Deborah Haynes: Baghdad; Michael Evans: Defence Editor and Richard Beeston: Diplomatic Editor
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now

More than half the Iraqi interpreters who applied to come to live in Britain have had their applications rejected, drawing accusations that the Government is “wriggling out” of its promise to help former Iraqi employees.
The Times has learnt that 125 of the 200 interpreters who took up the offer to resettle in Britain have failed to meet the strict criteria laid down for eligibility.
The revelation challenges Gordon Brown’s pledge in August that the Government would fulfil its “duty of care” to those who had served with British troops.
In three cases seen by The Times, former Iraqi employees were told that they were ineligible because of “absenteeism”.
The interpreters claim that they risked their lives to serve the British and are living in constant danger of reprisal from Shia militias. If they did not show up for work, it was because they were fleeing for their lives. They said that they now felt betrayed by the Government.
After a two-month campaign by The Times that highlighted the plight of the interpreters, David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, promised to help them under a scheme launched in October.
Last night MPs urged the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to reconsider the decisions. The 200 interpreters are among a total of 600 Iraqis who have applied to come to Britain, all people who have worked for the British and who today face intimidation from Iranian-backed Shia groups.
Safa, 28, one of the rejected interpreters who worked for the British for more than two years, received a letter from the Locally Employed Staff Assistance Office in Basra which said: “We have considered your case very carefully but we are sorry to inform you that, because your service with the British Forces was terminated for absence, you do not meet the minimum employment criteria for this scheme.”
Safa told The Times that he had never resigned but had been forced to stop working after receiving two bullets and a written death threat at his house in Basra in April. Married with one child, he said that he was advised by an army liaison officer and intelligence officials to stay at home until he felt safe.
A few months later the interpreter contacted the military to see if he could return only to be told that he was not needed but would be called if an opening arose.
Safa thought back to when he had stood by the British troops during two and a half years of service since April 2004.
“Was I absent when they needed their lives saving?” he said, recalling the time that he took off his flak jacket and turned his T-shirt and trousers into a makeshift rope to help 12 soldiers out of an irrigation channel. They had been struggling to cross because of the weight of their body armour and weapons.
“Was I absent when the militias were mortaring us all the time? Was I absent when I had to sleep in the cold desert with the soldiers?”
Iraqis employed by the British have to prove “continuous” service for at least 12 months to be eligible to come to Britain. The interpreters have had the highest-profile jobs, but others who have worked at the Embassy in Baghdad, the consulate in Basra and with the Department for International Development have also faced threats.
The MoD yesterday insisted that if an Iraqi could prove that he had been absent from work because of intimidation, then he would still be considered. But it emerged that those who have now been turned down for British residency have no right of appeal.
The FCO refused to discuss individual cases but, in a statement, said: “Staff who terminated their employment as a result of intimidation are eligible for assistance. We fully recognise the difficulties of such staff and do not insist on official or formal notification, or staff working out their notice.”
David Lidington, a Conservative foreign affairs spokesman, said the Government should not try to “wriggle out” of commitments made to former Iraqi employees. “The test should be whether they are in danger because they worked for the British, not their record in the attendance register.”
Lynne Featherstone, a Liberal Democrat MP who has championed the cause of the Iraqi interpreters, said that the Government needed to use its imagination in a difficult case.
“If those Iraqis who have helped us are now being told that they can't come here because their absence was regarded as a resignation, this is the world gone mad,” she said.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Direct from the farms

Overseas contacts and local business information
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
i have friends who are interpreters and this government are lacking in morals if they abandon these men to a terrible death. they are being hunted as trators . these men have provided valuable intel to our troops and deserve a place of safety
joe brussels ur not in england and your vies stink no matter the legality of the war these men deserve our gratitude and our help most will go back when its safe we put these men in danger we must help them god bless them theyre good hard working people. only want to live not be slaughtered.
zara, nottingham,
How is it that this country lets in thousands of scrounging immigrants with nothing to offer this country, then turns its back on people who have helped them. If it wasn't for the Iraqi interpreters i reckon we'd have had a lot more casualties in Iraq. They've earned the right to live here, with us, as friends. Let them in and kick out the scroungers!!!!!!!!!!!!
chris haith, colchester, essex
What a sickening betrayal of these people. Have the government absolutely no conscience? Quite a contrast with the efforts being made to return the inmates from Guantanomo to live among us. The interpreters are friends of this country and, thanks to helping us, genuine asylum seekers. I don't see a need for any other criteria to be met.
Michael Woodman, Bradford, UK
It makes sense to keep them out - does Britain really want people who supported an invading army participating in an illegal war? Does anybody? The name of a certain historical scandinavian figure springs to mind.
Joe, brussels, belgium
Two points:
One, how, in a war zone, do you prove "absence from work because of intimidationâ?
Two, what signal has this sent to parts of the world where British forces may have to serve in the future? Who would want to put their lives at risk for the British now?
Ray, London, England
How can they turn down these people who helped our troops while opening the floodgates to thousands of illegal immigrants, housing them, giving them benefits & legal aid to fight the government?
George, Glasgow, UK
Words fail me. How can this country and this government command anymore respect when it fails those people who have supported our troops with potentially great cost to themselves. Any futher mealy-mouthed utterences from our Great Leader on this issue should only be treated with contempt unless and until all those who risked their lives are given the respect they deserve.
Andy, Exeter,
It's events and hollow promises like these that make me loathe this countryl. Just another example of how Gordon Brown, the MOD and other government departments make the job more difficult for our Armed Forces and undermine our standing in the world.
Peter Hunter, Edinburgh,
This shameful Government should be made to pay for its lies and deceptions once they are out of office. Liars, such a Miliband, have practiced a deception of the most cruel type and level upon the men who risked thier lives to help British soldiers. This is 'criminal'. No other word can describe such an act of deception and betrayal that will lead to the deaths of some and poverty or exile, at the least, for the others.
This government makes me ashamed to be British. No wonder decent people are leaving the U K in droves - sickened by the hypocracy of Labour toadies.
Riley, Kyiv, Ukraine
what the hell is wrong with Britain?
David, London,
One would have thought that these people are well rewarded in that their country is gradually being returned to them. To suggest that being domiciled in Britain is any great prize, in the face of the struggles being endured by all sorts of immigrants here, the general social malaise and the burgeoning credit crises, seems like second prize rather than first. The circumstances that these people may have wanted to have fled from no longer apply. If they thought that their service was to their country, that they were doing what was right and proper, then they have been rewarded. If they did what they did for money, they have long since had their reward. If we seek to undermine Iraq, as we have undermined so many other countries, then all we need to do is to remove the people of conscience, the high-minded and brave, and the job is done. Iraq needs these people, they will play an important part in the nations evolutions; their skills will ensure prosperity in the new order.
Malcolm Turner, Alsager, England
I think the members of this government should hang their collective heads in shame, how many immigrants have been allowed into this country with thousands more coming into this country without any input to the workings of this country yet these interpreters etc, have risked their own lives and their families lives for our benefit in the middle east and this is how we treat them!!! Disgraceful.
Pete Hollyman, Kingsteignton,
Well maybe the interpreters will change their minds as well, and take out a few brit soldiers either directly or by passing over sensitive information to the opposition.
ant, Limoges, France
Promises , promises....why do we even listen, let alone complain when one more promise is made, knowing full well it will be broken? From promises of a referendum on the Euopean constitution, compensation for pensioners, and an increase in police pay to this latest mean and heartless betrayal ( I would have written "dishonourable", but any word connected with honour is obviously absent from this government's vocabulary), we are confronted with an incredible series of broken promises. It would seem that this administration worries far more about political correctness (on the part of other people) than ordinary human decency in its own dealings.
Ian McMorran, Shanghai, China
Britain has never had a reputation for honouring committments. Ask the HSMP's or any immigrant on a 4 year visa about retrospective implementation of new requirements and the added thousands of pounds we have had to pay as a result!!!
Chantel, UK,
Shameful, cynical, shabby. Why are we surprised? This sums up this dreadful, self-serving embarrassing executive.
David Hoggard, York,
i am ashamed of this corrupt country
col, leeds, uk
"If Britain can't support these interpreters, then they should automatically be sent the the United States.
Thomas Folan, Bessboro, Blackrock, County Cork, Ireland"
Mr. Folan, We would be proud to have them.
Paul Woodside, San Jose, California
This is typical of the British Government! Let all the low-life from every part of europe, who will refuse to speak English, walk around if they own the place, setting up Gangs using intimidation & threats & other acts of violence as if they are still in they scum-city they came from! But those from Iraq who have offered valued service who will make a valued contribution, they are refused! If the UK ever needs defending, who do think will do it? No the bunch of low-life "New Immigrants" we have seen that is for sure!!
lee stewart, Kettering, England
It is sad that George W Bush is turning his back on them as well! Him & Gordon Brown are Political Traitors!!
lee stewart, Kettering, England
Why not give them different coloured Passports .. Pattons HK idea and just screw them.. We have no honour as country. And while we are at it we will let the Russian and Columbian mafia into our country, Gordon Brown is not a leader!!
Tristian Gry, Horley, surrey
When will these people learn that if you want to get into the UK you have to have no skills, be unable to speak English and have nothing to offer apart from the ability to sponge of the state and vote labour.
Ajer, Reading, UK
connolly, potters bar, uk: These Iraqi interpreters have proved their loyalyty to Britain. They are 600 as against the hundreds of thousands of immigrants that Britain is allowing in annually. Many of this latter lot have no loyalty whatsoever to Britain and a minority of them would destroy it if they had their head.
If Denmark can let in all theirs then Britain MUST do likewise.
M.Lester, London, UK
The attitude of the government on this issue makes me ashamed to be British.
Betty Harris, London,
Completely agree with all of the previous comments.
What is causing key concern at present, is that even those former translators who "easily qualfy" now have to wait until a Home Office team visits the region in 2008 to interview applicants.
This is a disgrace and will further damage our reputation in the region and around the world.
Mark Brockway, London,
A morally bankrupt government. Most Ministers could not care less while they have their noses in the expenses pot. We will remember at election time.
Alan, Preston,
According to the Danish Radio dr.dk on 09 December, 373 Iraqi interpreters have arrived in Denmark, out of whom 306 have received asylum in Denmark.
These interpreters or other former employees had been working for the Danish forces in the British controlled sector, before the forces were withdrawn earlier in 2007.
Politically speaking, the interpreters were granted asylum, because: "The Brits will also grant their interpreters asylum, just like the Americans".
Any "British" Iraqi interpreter who worked at least 1 hour for joint British/Danish patrols left behind?
A pity, that hate preachers are let in to do their dirty work in London, but people risking their lives for "Queen and Country" are not.
Lund, Hamburg, Germany
When Ministers make offers they should stand by them or be held personally responsible.
Details of their shortcomings could be made freely available at election time- to be shared with their constituents.
DMM, Eastbourne,
What a morally bankrupt regime, no, not Burma, Iraq, Iran, the Sudan, here.
Bunch of spivs.
Ken Wyatt, Todmorden, uk
We do not uphold the duty of care to our own -what chance those of other countries - as for loyalty -or service it counts for nothing-
However should anyone of any nationality - friend or foe-choose to cross several democratic (E.U.)countries to get to the U.K. and then plead polictical asylum they sttill have a very high chance of remaining here-much higher than those who have served the the interests of this nation in Iracq.
A recent visit to France evidenced that this view is still held by hundreds waiting to cross - friend or foe??
mike cassidy, oxford, uk
look after our own people first sorry their are hundreds of youngsrers on the street and old people who cant afford to live. the government should be thinking of them
connolly, potters bar, uk
Again, the government disappoints me. What difference does 600 people make to the overall population in this country. Why make it so hard for these people to enter ? I think that they've earned their right to live in safety.
Barrie, Brussels,
Sure we will take them Thomas Folan. We won't turn our back
on them.
Jerry Scroggin, Phoenix, Arizona/USA
And yet, Britain actively seeks the return of those 4 inmates at Guantanamo Bay.....
Michael, London,
If Britain can't support these interpreters, then they should automatically be sent the the United States.
Thomas Folan, Bessboro, Blackrock, County Cork, Ireland