Sam Coates, Chief Political Correspondent
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
David Cameron will unveil a “three strikes and you’re out” policy for the unemployed tomorrow that will see them lose benefits if they reject a job.
Unemployment benefit claimants would lose a month in payments if they turned down an offer defined as reasonable under Government guide-lines. They would lose three months if they refused a second job and three years of benefits if they rejected a third.
This will form a central part of Mr Cameron’s welfare proposals, which will be revealed tomorrow in Brixton.
According to Conservative figures, a couple claiming jobseeker’s allowance would forgo £92.80 a week – more than half their total income, assuming they also claimed housing and council tax benefits.
Parents on jobseeker’s allowance or incapacity benefit could lose between a quarter and a third of their income if they failed to comply with the conditions of the welfare programme. However, the Department for Work and Pensions pointed out that sanctions exist for people who turn down jobs and benefits can be removed for 26 weeks.
Chris Grayling, the Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary, said: “We think it’s time to take tough action against those who are deliberately staying at home and claiming benefits rather than going back into work.”
Peter Hain, the Work and Pensions Secretary, called the Tory plans spin: “Seeking to present a ‘three strikes’ policy as a radical shift is dishonest.”
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice

Overseas contacts and local business information
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I've got eight kids and haven't done a days work in seventeen years. I would rather starve than work for this society. I'm not contributing to an unsustainable decadent and degenerate society.
The right to withhold ones labour is a personal revolutionary act others should emulate. We only have one life. I don't see why I should pay taxes to an immoral capitalist system based on systematic theft of the time and labour of the working class.
Capitalism requires poverty as a means of economic coersion, this forces people to work and prop up the capitalist pyramid. The poor should not cooperate.
The wealthy and the politicians don't work. They take their money from the people by the systematic theft that is part and parcel of the production process.
Keith, Wigan, UK
I am 62 Yrs old and due to injury in oct 2006 I have had to wait till Nov 2007 for a scan and get the results in january 2008.
i am a tse with british gas and they paid me full salary for 6 months and haf salary for 6 months.
Since sept 2007 till to days date i have not recieved any finacial help from this government, because i am not disabled enough, and beeing still on the books with bg i cannot claim job seekers allowance, so no help with council tax etc.
is it because I am british and not a immigrant worker.
John Davis, Doncaster, England
About time too. The welfare state is there to support those truly in need, not spongers. We have to instill work ethics in our society.
Hamad Lone, London, England
I dispair at the throw-away remarks / generalisations that the unemployed are somehow profiteering from claiming benefits. Unemployment is a miserable experience that could affect anyone of us. Those that are affected quickly become derailed by the cost of living and the cost of looking for work. What the unemployed need is a more comprehensive support structure that goes beyond the offer of a job and actually acknowledges the basic cost of going to work, particularly for those with children. This society needs a little more empathy and care for each other, a little less selfishness, and a little more thought towards these issues than the headline grabbing proposals made by politicians with only one motive on their minds - to win votes.
David Evans, Coleford, Gloucestershire
i have just had benifits for a prolonged period of time , during this time i was used by the governmant to care for my elderly parents. it didnt stop there, i also had to home educate my daughter who was some were in the autistic spectrum, i still cant get her to stay in school and she is still being assesed she is 15 we havent been able to obtain disability because
of that . it gets worse i was turned down for brain surgery because i was an unpaid carer only to find out 4 years down the road that i dont need it and there wasnt any need for the exstrer stress ive undergone . i cant get disability and im not allowed to drive. im hopping that know i will be able to get the operations i need for my cateracts as im going blind. not a disability. im desperate to work but im going to have to lie about my condition , as soon as you say you have a cavrenous angioma on your brain stem no one wants you. i was turned down by oxfam when i offered my services for free.
heather yeoman, eastgrinstead, mid suusex
The Labour government is perfectly happy to keep these layabouts on benefits... and to allow mass imigration... if they actually went and did something about it, then they'd be losing votes... It's all purely a move to keep themselves in power and to make it impossible for the Tories to ever get votes...
paulc, gloucester,
Why dont the tories put up minium wage and make it worth it going back to work im single and the mimium wage is a joke
i might as well be a slave!
michael atherton, keighley, west yorkshire
Aslong as a 'fair job' is not £2 a week more than you'd get on the dole.
I'm all for making people work, but make it in their benefit to work.
I'd personally make everyone, male or female, old or young, do 'work' for the government, if they get job seekers allowance. This would be cleaning graffiti (that would make parents stop their kids spraying, if they had to clean it off!), or cleaning parks, or weeding the flowers in the flower pots along the highstreet. That will give them incentive to find a nicer job.
I also think prisoners should be made to sort rubbish for recycling items!
Arthur, Newcastle,
If this change takes place how many people will simply be put on the disability register instead of job seekers allowance. This is already a standard practice to keep the unemployment figures down.
Anyone claiming benefits from the government should be vetted to ensure they are entitled. That means no economic migration of European citizens, illegal immigrants etc.
It would also be a good idea at the same time to state that if you are caught working on the side and claiming benefits you will be charged and go to jail and forever forfeit your entitlements.
joe, Edinburgh, Scotland
I definitely agree. Jobseekers allowance is truly for those people who are actively looking for work. The benefit just keeps them going with their household living. What really gets me angry, is seeing people claim benefit for their whole family, and drive around in a merc, and have a under the table pay job, while ther are people like me, who has just got in at 12,30am back from work to make sure that i have food on my table. Falsely claiming benefit is a crime. its theft. The money we pay from our taxes deducted from our wages are used to pay benefits. I think its really wrong and its about time the govnt has done something about it. Not only it keeps false claims at bay, but makes people responsible and mature, into knowing that you have to earn what you want - not steal.
Shah, London,
WIN WIN SITUATION...
But i got a family of one child & my house wife obviously who dont work so that means I would be working & my Wife would be on benifits...
if not then i suppose that this policy is actually in the BIN for me ...
Thank you.
M.H.B
Mohammad Butt, Bristol, United Kingdom
Deport all illegal aliens, and stop immigration immediately,
scrap income tax and then we could all get back to work.
Oh yes, and dump this absurd eu nonsense,
British Jobs for British People!
Clive Burghard , LANCING, ENGLAND