Richard Ford
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today
Thousands of police officers preparing for a protest march over pay have been warned to visit the lavatory before taking to the streets, to bring their own sandwiches and not, under any circumstances, to cause trouble.
A definitive guide to protesting has been issued by the Police Federation to up to 15,000 officers from all 43 forces in England and Wales who will demonstrate today over the Government’s reneging on a pay deal.
Officials, anxious to avoid embarrassing scenes, have urged the protesters to ensure that they retain the moral high ground and do not make it difficult for colleagues policing the march.
The guidance for the occasion — it is the first time that police have marched to demonstrate their anger over a pay deal or unhappiness with a Government reform programme — warns that other groups might stage counter-demonstrations.
It states: “We would ask that you do not react to any taunts; do not get involved and allow our Metropolitan Police colleagues to police as they see appropriate.
“Remember. We have the moral high ground. We will continue to conduct ourselves with dignity and pride.”
The guidance for the Central London march, which will pass the Home Office, also suggests that officers should wear suitable and comfortable clothes and footwear in the event of inclement weather. It adds: “Unfortunately we are unable to provide you all with refreshments but there are plenty of shops, cafes and restaurants in the area or you may wish to bring your own.”
The guidance advises officers to use the lavatory before setting off as there are likely to be queues at those on the route. Officers will lobby MPs over the decision of Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, not to backdate to September a 2.5 per cent rise for police in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. They say that this means that their rise, paid from December 2007, amounts to 1.9 per cent and therefore breaches the deal.
Ms Smith will hold talks with Police Federation leaders after the rally to discuss the dispute and a multi-year deal for the future. The timing and place of the meeting is not being disclosed for security reasons, the Home Office said.
While it is the first time that police have marched, they have previously held rallies in London to protest against Conservative and Labour Government proposals on conditions.
Police are banned from striking by a 1919 Act of Parliament after strikes in London and Liverpool when officers refused to go on duty.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Danny and John, blissful in their ignorance that it is the police who decide which targets to aim for.
It is the Government which decides that the police should focus on 'easy' offences. This makes the crime figures look better.
Ask ANY police officer and they will tell you that they would jump at the chance to punish the yobs and hooligans making our streets and cities no-go areas.
Matt, Bristol,
It is absolutely right that the police should have the opportunity to present their views and express their grievances. Peacefully. Todayâs times are seeing increased bureaucracy within the public services, the imposition of targets, and ridiculous reliance placed upon facts, figures and statistics in measuring performance. Indeed, the easiest courses of action are pursued so that it appears on face value that targets are being met, that crime rates are being reduced and thus are neighbourhoods are safer. I therefore wholeheartedly agree with John from Lincoln. There is, quite simply, no substitute for real policing where the force is out on the streets and âgetting their hands dirtyâ. Only by those means will we see a real difference, and only then will people feel safer to leave their own homes. In the meeting between Jacqui Smith and the Police Federation, lets hope that the bargain comes out in the governmentâs favour. The police deserve no more pay then they currently receive.
Marcin Roth, London, UK
With regards to police demonstration, there surfaces a language issue. The 1911 Parliament Act banned police striking, yet they are now involved in a protest in London. According to the Collins English dictionary, a strike is âto stop working collectively as a protest against working conditions, [such as] low payâ. Well, defining one word with the use of the other offers little guidance. A protest, by the same source, is âa demonstration or objection ⦠a strong objectionâ. It is ironic, therefore, that out of the two forms of demonstration, the police have been prevented from engaging in the more peaceful, but are permitted to stage the more violent. And this is in parallel with the Police Federation guidelines which state that the police must conduct their protest with âdignity and prideâ. Well, of course they should, nobody disputes that as they do not dispute that the police officers themselves should not result to violence. Anyway, the distinction is interesting.
Marcin Roth, London, UK
Surely the issue here is that if a system for independant pay review is set up it should be binding on both parties and not just one of them. The actual amount is rather irrelevant.
As for the point about targets, these are set by politicians and if not met by Chief Constables they lose their jobs as has happened in both Surrey and Humberside. Motoring offences do not count, they are neither soft targets nor cime targets. However, almost ten times as many people are killed on our roads as are murdered each year.
It is clear that many people care little about national targets, but are concerened with what is happening in their community, which they rightly expect the police to deal with. It is time the Government listened to communities rather than trying to grab headlines.
James, Bicester, Oxfordshire,
No sympathy for the police at all as they have no respect for the public. They are only interested in meeting targets and do so by persuing soft "crime" such as motoring offences. We are not safe on the streets or in our homes, just try to get them to turn out if you have a problem. They deserve nothing by way of pay rises.
john, lincoln,
if even the home secretery cannot walk the streets due to crime levels, i would freeze their money until they get out and do their job ie protect the public who pay them.
Danny, London,
Presumably the guidance will also remind them that it is a criminal offence to walk past Downing Street while politically motivated, teach them the proper way to show passive resistance by making oneself a dead weight being arrested, and remind them to take the shoulder number of any of their colleagues who put the boot in.
John, London,
We, the law abiding members of the public can Police the event. It shouldn't be a problem. Hope its not in the dark though, or the Home Secretary might be frightened to come out of her ivory tower.
Neil, Gloucestershire, England