Richard Ford, Home Correspondent
Win VIP tickets
A controversial proposal by the Government to extend pre-charge detention for terror suspects to up to 42 days could undermine the help that Muslim groups are giving police, according to the Home Office’s official assessment of the measure.
The groups also said that a planned new offence, making it illegal to collect information on members of the Armed Forces likely to be useful to a terrorist, would reinforce concerns that they were not sure what they were allowed to talk about.
The assessment, published alongside the Counter Terrorism Bill yesterday, said that there was a belief among the Muslim community that it was being discriminated against and that this may continue under the new law.
“Muslim community representatives expressed a concern that this may lead to increased reluctance among their communities to provide vital co-operation and assistance to the police and security services,” the equality impact assessment on the Bill said. The Bill’s key proposal to increase from 28 days to up to 42 days the time police can hold terror suspects without charge came under a barrage of criticism from opposition MPs and civil liberties groups.
Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, said that the plan to extend pre-charge detention, which is expected to run into trouble with Labour backbenchers, would come into force only in “exceptional operational circumstances” such as multiple terror plots, the need to interview suspects abroad and retrieve large amounts of information from computer disks. Powers to impose the 42-day limit would be kept in reserve and could only be brought in temporarily. Under the plan, the Home Secretary will be able immediately to extend the limit to 42 days if a joint report by a chief constable and the Director of Public Prosecutions backs the move. Parliament will have to approve the extension within 30 days but if either House votes against the move, the power comes to an end at midnight on the day of the debate.
The limit will be available to police for two months at any one time unless it is renewed. Individual detentions over 28 days will be extended every seven days on the approval of a judge. A suspect could be held for 42 days even if Parliament eventually refused permission for an extension beyond 28 days. If the Home Secretary decided on an extension towards the end of the existing 28-day limit, Parliament would not have to approve it for 30 days. In such circumstances a suspect could have been charged or released by the time a vote was due. The Government has insisted that even if Parliament were to reject an extension to 42 days, a person would still have been lawfully held. David Davis, Shadow Home Secretary, said the Government had produced no evidence to justify extending pre-charge detention.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Speaking as a Muslim 42 days is not a long time. If you're not a criminal, you shouldn't have anything to worry about. I don't see a problem, as long as the suspect of every religion/race is treated the same. Muslims do not have a monopoly on terrorism.
Mohammed, London, UK
Strange is it not that when Mr Blair, Brown and co got into power, there was a frenzy for 'passing more laws'. As has been said in many a newspaper and other place, NU Labour under our current 'Dear Leaders' have passed more laws to do with crime, law and order, anti-terrorism than any previous Labour or Conservative government ever in the past 40 or so years..
30 years of IRA terrorism, and the UK dealt with that with the laws then. So why the difference? Terrosim is terrorism whatever its scource and motivation. It maybe the case that Mr Blair, Brown et al truly beleive that laws will 'cure all societys ills' -- WRONG! It makes it MORE likely that loopholes will be found as a 'get round', and theres always that hoary old one. The 'Human Rights Act 1998' seems to be the get out clause 'Do Not Go to Jail' ticket that is used time and time again.
Maybe they are all 'closet' Joe Stalin Wannabees?
B Clarke, Chelmsford, England UK
We are coming up to Holocaust Memorial Day but the lessons of the past have not been learned.
Simply replace Jew with Muslim, and you have people casually talking about criminalising and punishing people on account of their religion, just as their German counterparts did 70 years ago.
But then again, why should I expect a European 'civilisation' that slaughtered 6 million people to change in a mere 70 years?
The Labour Party are becoming the new National Socialists. History repeats itself.
Bilal Patel, London, UK,
So, there is a planned new offence, making it illegal to collect information on members of the Armed Forces likely to be useful to a terrorist? Where does that leave welfare organisations such as SSAFA, whose information would certainly be of use to terrorist organisations.
Whoever dreamed that one up plainly has the IQ of a plant!
John Lockett, Burnley, Lancashire
Well perhaps they shouldn't create closed communities that encourage and foster terroism, offend British sensibilities and disrupt our way of life whilst resisting integration and campagining against Christian, British culture? Hmm? Just a thought but they really should look in the mirror...if it doesn't offend them of course.
Eric, London,
I completely agree with the new proposition to extend pre-charge detention. Is it not better hold a suspect for an extensive amount of time and conclude that he is not guilty rather than to release him and he is; in this situatuion, national security prevails over civil liberty.
Rachael, London, United Kingdom
Barry, you are safe in New Zealand. We have to live here and frankly very few of us trust this government whose 'extraordinary measures' seem to become the default very quickly. We aren't scared of terrorists but we are scared of this governments nannying, law passing (3000+ new laws in 10 years), interference in our lives which borders on and has surpassed orwells 1984 at times.
G Davidson, Glasgow, UK
Barry
Your comments are disgusting. The barbarian west has not been able to define Terrorism for the simple fear that they are the biggest terrorist. Look at Genocide in Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine; all brought by immoral western civilization influenced by Judeo-christianity. All those crimes are state sponsored terror but West having the key to morality will never accept those immoral acts.
John, Bombay, India
Just the time it takes to sort through computer information makes it necessary for 42 days, and why are the muslim communities against it. Would it be they know the terrorist threat comes from Muslim's
and they don't want their brothers held for more than
28days in case the police break them.
Barry Holmes, Christchurch, New Zealand