Greg Hurst and Yepoka Yeebo
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
The two students whose “employment” at public expense brought down their father appear to lead a gilded life far removed from Derek Conway’s working-class upbringing in Tyneside.
Henry Conway, 25, and his brother Freddie, 22, who both attended the £24,000-a-year Harrow School, were each paid at least £10,000 as researchers for their father while at university.
Henry, a fashion writer who once crowned himself “Queen Sloane” in a BBC interview, had the distinction of entitling a party he threw at a Chelsea nightclub last November the “F*** Off I’m Rich” party.
The Cambridge University graduate is also known to put on themed parties at the Mahiki nightclub in London, a favoured haunt of Prince Harry.
It was his Freddie’s entries on the social networking website Facebook that proved that he was a full-time undergraduate at Newcastle University while he was being paid as a researcher by his father. Freddie , who is thought to be at Sandhurst, posted pictures of his 21st birthday party he held on the terrace of the Commons.
On another website, Bebo, Freddie’s friends wrote about his holiday exploits in Thailand and Mexico.
Derek Conway is not alone within Westminster in employing his members of his family, however. The practice is so widespread that many of those involved in Derek Conway’s case are in a similar position.
A fellow Conservative MP Sir George Young, chairman of the Standards and Privileges Committee, which proposed Mr Conway's ten-day suspension, retains his daughter, Camilla, as his secretary. Patrick McLoughlin, the party’s Chief Whip, who advised David Cam-eron on what action he should take, employs his wife as his secretary. The wife of Roger Gale, the Tory backbencher who was one of the few prepared to defend Mr Conway yesterday, works as his constituency secretary.
The Times yesterday counted 40 MPs, from all three main parties, who list family members among their staff. This is an underestimate because it excludes those using maiden or married names. Another 35 MPs list wives, husbands, sons and daughters in the register of interests for Members’ secretaries and research assistants, although some have Commons passes rather than paid jobs.
MPs who employ family members include Margaret Beckett, whose omnipresent husband, Leo, is her parliamentary assistant, Sir Menzies Campbell, whose wife, Elspeth, is his constituency secretary, and Quentin Davies, the Tory MP who defected to Labour, whose wife, Chantal, is his parliamentary assistant.
Members of the Government include Caroline Flint, the Housing Minister, whose husband, Phil Cole, works in her constituency office; Stephen Ladyman, the Transport Minister, whose wife, Janet, is his constituency office manager, and Tommy McAvoy, a senior whip, whose wife, Eleanor, works in his constituency office.
Even the Speaker, Michael Martin, has been involved in controversy in the past over payments to his wife and daughter, both called Mary, for working in his constituency office.
MPs insist that there is nothing wrong with hiring family members, provided that they work hard in the job they are paid to do.
Mr McLoughlin told The Times: “A lot of Members of Parliament do employ their wives and there is no rule to prevent them from doing so. They usually find they get very, very good service as a result of that. Sometimes – occasionally – things go wrong, but these are rare cases.”
But trade unionists representing MPs’ staff have pressed for greater checks to ensure that spouses and children hired by politicians are working as they should. Kevin Flack, secretary of the T&G (Unite) Parliamentary Staff Branch, which has 400 members, said: “It causes great ill-feeling in an office as an MP always sides with that member of staff. There should be greater checks that the person is doing the job. The Conway case is probably the tip of the iceberg.”
What they can pay
— Since 2001 the Commons has issued standard contracts for MPs’ staff and set pay bands, based on a 37.5hour week, that range from a starting salary of £13,082 for caseworkers to £38,623 for the most experienced assistants
— Bonuses of up to 15 per cent of salary are allowed, although critics say the system is open to abuse because the MP rather than the Commons is the employer
— MPs raised their staff budgets last week from £90,505 to between £96,630 and £102,650 a year, depending on whether the staff are based in London. It is intended to allow for three full-time staff and one part-time employee

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I feel sorry for them. What chance do they stand of being half decent human beings with a thief for a father? As they say, 'like father, like son'. We will probably be reading about them in 20 years time. They can't have been taught any kind of morality can they? After all their father doesn't seem to have any.
judy, Liverpool, England
I thought that patronage had been slowly dying out and that we had been inexorably trying to move towards a meritocracy over the last fifty years. It seems that MPs on all sides of the House cannot abide by the very rules that they make for the rest of the populace.
After the Hain affair and now this, it is a salutary reminder that hypocrisy is alive and well in Parliament.
Richard, London, England
I have no problem with family being paid to do work. It's quite understandable that an MPs work will require their involvement (phone, letters, attendance at events, etc), so why not pay for it. The problem comes when, after taking huge payments for support salary and expenses at our cost, the MPs reward themselves huge increases whilst at the same time telling everyone to limit their own rises and that families are not allowed to share in the rewards from a family business that they've all taken a risk with.
We are not the servants of MPs and the government, but they behave like it is that way round. They need to be brought back in line.
Mark, London,
Any changes to the regulations surrounding the earnings (including salaries and office and private expenses) of MPs must include provisions to put them on the same footing as privately held companies. At present MPs are not obliged to submit detailed accounts backed up by receipts.
This has to stop.
It is irreconcilable to allow MPs to be subject to a set of rules that sets them apart from those they are supposed to serve.
End the distinction between the political elite and the masses and we go a long way to restoring the trust in our legislators that is now so sadly lacking.
Edwin, Bucharest,