Dalya Alberge, Arts Correspondent
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Leading authors condemned as “churlish and petty” yesterday the Government’s decision to reduce the only funds that it gives directly to contemporary literature - particularly as 75 per cent of writers earn less than half the national average wage.
Speaking to The Times, Michael Holroyd, the biographer and former chairman of the Royal Society of Literature, said that cutting the funding to the Public Lending Right (PLR), by which authors receive 6p every time one of their books is lent by public libraries, was shameful.
The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) is to reduce funding to the organisation from £7.68 million for 2007-08 to £7.4 million for 2008-09.
Mr Holroyd added: “The PLR is the only money that the Government gives directly to contemporary literature. They can’t do that. Such a small saving is a completely false economy. [The money saved] will not get anyone to an Olympic stadium.”
Tracy Chevalier, the author of Girl With a Pearl Earring and chairman of the Society of Authors, said: “Most authors can’t make a living off their work. The PLR is a very welcome contribution. For the Government to cut what is a reasonably small amount seems churlish and petty.”
She spoke of the irony of such cuts taking place in 2008 – designated as the National Year of Reading.
The PLR funds are being distributed this year to 23,942 writers, illustrators, photographers, translators and editors who have contributed to books lent out by public libraries. For 80 per cent of them, the contribution is vital to their income.
Simon Brett, chairman of the PLR’s advisory committee, said of the cut: “It’s serious. Everyone knew it would be a tough spending round, but almost all the other institutions looked after by the DCMS have got inflation taken into account into their settlements for the next three years. We haven’t. Saving less than £1 million seems mean.”
Payouts are capped at £6,600 but the average this year will be just £320.
Mr Brett said: “It’s particularly valuable for older writers whose books may not be in print, but whose books are borrowed and read in libraries.”
A recent survey of writers’ incomes showed that the median of all respondents was £4,000. Looking only at “professional writers”, it was £12,300.
A DCMS spokesman said: “Authors need not worry. The small cuts in funding should be absorbed in admin savings, so the rate per loan is unlikely to go down.”

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
So what? The Government gets most of the PLR money back in tax anyway. The £6,000 payments (all the cream off the top) are made to the richest writers in the land who pay 40% tax if resident in the UK. J K Rowland's £6,000 goes back to the exchequer. Meanwhile,the poets get nothing.
Pete, London
Pete ,London, LONDON, en gland
If a book's cover showed what percentage goes to the author and what percentage goes to other parties, then the public would realize how little the author is rewarded for his or her work.
Jay Mandal, Camberley,
The system operating here is due to the fact that the authors permit their works to be loaned via the public library service. If authors refused they would force a subscription or hire licence fee which in turn would reduce the amount of literature available to the general public unless purchased. Even if the lending of a published piece of work is part of legislation there would be nothing from preventing an author from creating their works in a format that would ensure a regular income from an item loan the most obvious one being by creating an e-book and requesting a fee to access. If an author can't make a living why would they write? If the cost of a loanable item increaed then libraries would have to hire out or do what meuseums do and charge a membership fee or entrance fee.
CJ, Gloucester, UK
Has anyone asked why writers should be given government subsidies? Surely, the measure of good writing is the publics readership, for the reading public is the final arbiter of the worthiness of their writing. Why do writers or artists feel their are entitled to the hard earned taxes payed by the public?
Bob Evans, Anaheim, California