Your last chance to get tickets to Top Gear Live

A defiant Wendy Alexander insisted last night that she intended to hang on as the head of Labour in Scotland despite being reported to the prosecuting authorities for not registering donations to her leadership campaign.
Ms Alexander, a close friend and ally of the Prime Minister and the sister of Douglas Alexander, the International Development Secretary, maintained that she was “getting on with the job” and that she was determined to prove her innocence.
She was buoyed by robust declarations of support from her Labour group of MSPs at Holyrood and from other key figures in the Scottish party, some of whom hinted that they believe the standards watchdog who has referred her case to prosecutors is guilty of a “stitch-up”.
Neither, it appeared last night, is there any appetite from the direction of Downing Street for her to fall on her sword. Sources close to Gordon Brown said that, while the Prime Minister was anxious that the controversy showed no sign of dying down, Ms Alexander had to be given a chance. “She has to have the opportunity to get through this and get the focus in Scotland back on policy,” one source said.
However, some of her backbench MSPs also admitted that she had to stay in post because there is no obvious candidate to succeed her. Ms Alexander insisted that she had no intention of following the precedent set by Peter Hain, who resigned ten days ago as Work and Pensions Secretary after the Electoral Commission referred donations to his UK deputy leadership campaign to the police.
The latest episode in the donations furore that has engulfed Ms Alexander since she became Scottish leader unopposed less than five months ago, came when it was confirmed that Jim Dyer, the Standards Commissioner at the Scottish Parliament, had reported her to the procurator fiscal.
He had concluded that there was evidence she had broken the rules on declaring gifts by not registering ten leadership campaign donations of more than £520 in the MSPs’ register of interests at Holyrood.
The latest twist came two days after Ms Alexander issued a surprise statement on Friday saying that she had been advised last November by Parliament officials that she did not need to register the donations, but that Dr Dyer had now overturned that decision and she had immediately complied with his verdict.
It appears that Dr Dyer, after taking legal advice, has now decided on his course of action because he is obliged to do so as a result of a memorandum of agreement between himself as standards watchdog and the Crown Office, the prosecuting authority in Scotland.
His basis for doing so, it appears, is that her conduct in not registering the donations, if proved, could constitute a criminal offence. It is now up to the fiscal to decide whether Ms Alexander should be prosecuted.
Ms Alexander is also still awaiting the verdict of the Electoral Commission, which has been running a parallel inquiry into whether she should be referred to the prosecuting authorities for accepting a £950 donation, admitted by campaign colleagues to have been illegal, from a Jersey-based businessman who is not on the UK electoral register.
The outcome of the Commission’s inquiry is expected this week and Ms Alexander’s defence is that there was no “intentional wrongdoing” on her part.
Yesterday Ms Alexander appeared calm in the face of the latest blow and said that the party would be ill-served if she was to quit because of a “distraction”. She added: “I am clear that suggestions that I have been guilty of trying to subvert the law in the registration of donations are unfounded. I will not stand down for having followed the parliamentary authorities’ guidance.”
Michael McMahon, Labour’s chief whip at Holyrood, said: “Surely, the question is why she was given the wrong advice in the first place. We need to get her through this and we will emerge stronger.”
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - search houses for sale and rooms and property to rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Give us poor taxpayers a break, just get rid of her.
judy, Liverpool, England
Yes what an ongoing mess. The press have many pieces of information that in a crisis like this can be drip feed. I donât think it is essentially wrong, however the result is a massive loss of trust in our politicians. But why not! They all have participated and are guilty of winking at the biggest con in history. They including Mr Brown have ignored the reports of the brave EU Auditors that have warned us and them for 13 years running that up to 95% our £11 billions now over £12billions we contribute annually since Tony Blairâs Red lines were broken. Auditors confirm it is Unaccounted Missing - stolen?. Cumulatively British total 150billions 95% of which is Unaccounted for missing. For the whole EU including Germany France and the 27 other contributors amounts to over well over a trillion that is unaccounted, yet no questions in parliament. Why? Right to the top, and I mean to the top there is silence about this what only can be described as the greatest con in History.
Jas, Alders, Uk
Wendy Alexander cannot claim that there was "no intentional wrongdoing" in her acceptance of a donation from a Jersey businessman who is not on the U.K. electoral roll. After accepting the donation she wrote a personal "thank you" letter to him, presumably to his address in Jersey. The law is clear about donations and she, the leader of the Scottish Labour Party, should do the decent thing, admit her guilt and step down.
However, honour and decency seem to be unknown concepts to quite a few MPs and/or MSPs of most parties.
John, Larbert, Stirlingshire
Excuse me for being naive, but just how much donation money do you need for a leadership contest in which you are the only candidate?
mnairb, Hove,
I have just checked her Register of Interests on the Scottish Parliament website and there is still no record of any election donations! It could take a while to update I suppose.
However-
Her main interest (and income) other than as MSP seems to be producing calendars.
It's a funny old world.
R Bingham, Lauzun, France
Wendy Alexander cannot claim that there was "no intentional wrongdoing" in her acceptance of a donation from a Jersey businessman, who is not on the UK electoral roll. After receiving the payment she wrote a personal "thank you" letter to him, presumably at his Jersey address.
The law is clear on the matter of donations from outside the UK - they are NOT ACCEPTABLE. If she had any honour or decency she should admit her guilt, apologise to the Scottish electorate and step down. However, it is not unusual to see and hear how tenaciously the guilty ones try to cling on to their well-paid jobs with the lavish expenses and gold-plated pensions.
As Robert Burns said "an honest Man abune them a". It also applies to the female species.
John, Larbert, Stirlingshire
Wendy Alexander cannot claim that there was "no intentional wrongdoing" in her acceptance of a donation from a Jersey businessman, who is not on the UK electoral roll. After receiving the payment she wrote a personal "thank you" letter to him, presumably at his Jersey address.
The law is clear on donations from outside the UK - THEY ARE UNACCEPTABLE. If she has any honour or decency she should admit her guilt, apologise to the Scottish electorate and step down.
However, it's not unusual to see the way that MPs and MSPs, who are under attack, cling so tenaciously to their well-paid jobs with the lavish expenses and gold-plated pensions.
It was Robert Burns who wrote " an honest man's abune them a ". It apples equally to the female of the species.
John, Larbert, Stirlingshire
She has admitted breaking the law but says she did not do it intentionally.Can it really be credible for someone who breaks the law to stand up in court with that defence. She has to go and go now.The future of the Labour Party in Scotland is much more important than one power hungry politician.The SNP are loving it.
martin, dundee, Scotland
To be ignorant of the law is no defence for us common people so why do politicians think they are any different?
Mr G, Leeds , UK
Of course her MSPs are backing her. What else can they do - admit that she is a crook?
George, Glasgow, UK
Like the Telegraph the Times forgot to mention that Mr. Dyer, the Standards Commisioner sought the legal opinion of a QC to ascertain his obligations to the Scottish Laws introduced by the Labour Party. Yes thats right ,we have once again been betrayed by the New Labour Party again. At the least David Cameron had the"BOTTLE' to get rid of a dodgy politician. The pathetic Gordon Brown who must have slinked from his hiding place, under the desk to make the comment she must hang on.
Her Deputy and only possible candidate for Wendy's Job, Andy Kerr has now been named for commiting a breach of the Disclosure Laws on free gifts. It appears that he also forgot to list an expense paid trip from Macdonalds the dripping with fat burger people, for a period of four months. Another criminal act by New Labour and one that proves that these criminals in Labour just cant be trusted with the Public Purse.
Mike, Edinburgh, Scottish Nation.
I agree, let Ms Alexander stay in power, she will then be a constant reminder to the voters of the unexceptionable face of greed by our politicians, this then should be reminded that they should be the servants of trust
David Coe, norwich, uk
it is beginning to seem for unusual for any mp not to be guilty of financial irregularities.is ben wallace the only one honest enough to come out in the open over his financial activites?
grindlestheelder, london, england
Let her stay where she is. It will ensure for us, that Labour lose the next election.
C.Mclellan, Glasgow,