Philip Webster, Political Editor
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall

How The Sunday Times broke the story | Mousetrap weblog
Video briefing: who is Babar Ahmad? | Bugging explained
A decision to bug a conversation between a Labour MP and a constituent who was in prison was taken by police and was not authorised by ministers, MPs were told today.
But the conversation was not - as previously thought - a breach of 40 year old rules barring the bugging of MPs because the interception did not have to be approved by ministers.
Senior MPs had been under the impression that the Wilson doctrine - enunciated by the former Prime Minister Harold Wilson in 1966 - barred eavesdropping on MPs by the security forces.
Officials made clear today that it applied originally to the tapping of telephones and, even when updated by Gordon Brown last September, still did not apply to tapping that was not subject to approval by ministers.
It emerged that the bugging of the alleged conversations involving the MP Sadiq Khan and Babar Ahmad at Woodhill prison applied to circumstances that would have required the approval of a chief police officer, supervised by the Chief Surveillance Commissioner, rather than by ministers.
The doctrine protecting MPs’ conversations and mail applies only to operations which require the authorisation of a Secretary of State, Jack Straw told MPs. He stressed that in the case of eavesdropping operations authorisation was required only by a chief police office and ministers played no part.
“Where any operation involves the use of premises of HM Prison Service, neither the service, nor the minister concerned are asked for any additional authorisation for the particular operation,” said Mr Straw.
Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s spokesman said that there may still be implications for the doctrine.
He said: “We need to establish what the full facts are and what the implications are for the doctrine. The Government thinks it’s important there is a full and thorough inquiry.”
The Justice Secretary announced Chief Surveillance Commissioner Sir Christopher Rose is to head an inquiry into the allegations.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Given that most of the general public distrust politicians so much, should not every politicians every conversation be recorded and published? Is it obvious that the only profession in the country where you are immune from telling lies and are positively rewarded for it (barristers) seems to have a preponderence in the commons?
I would rather have a referndum on bugging politicians than on europe and I know which way I would vote.
bob
bob, cumbria, uk
Iâm sorry but given the standards of MP,s it is difficult to trust any of them to operate in the interests of GB particularly this conversation. I should like to have a transcript of the interview and let me judge the content in terms of innocence
John Taylor, Liverpool,
Why does it not apply to all bugging? This explanation is purely semantics.
imj, Abu Dhabi/UAE, UAE
For a constituant to have complete confidence in the MP it is essential that confidence is upheld.This is exactly the same as the doctor,patient relationship and the Priest,parishoner.Is it suggested it is OK to bug the confession box and the surgery.At the begining of any interview the MP will usually say "Do not tell me anything you know I will not be able to keep to myself. The decision to tell me is yours"
E Revell, Cambridge, Cambs
We live on an island, with lax controls at ports of entry and exit. so we have to put up with surveillance. Why should MP's be any different especially in the light of other recent revelations?
Dave, Chorley, UK