We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times

Westminster authorities spent £100,000 on a lavish redecoration of the grace-and-favour house for the officer who oversees MPs’ expenses, The Times has discovered.
The property at 3 Parliament Street used by the Clerk, the Commons chief executive, received a top-of-the range makeover, with a £39,000 kitchen, bespoke furniture, including a “butler’s tray”, and granite work surfaces. The same inventory also lists two Ionic columns costing £963.
The spending was not scrutinised by MPs on the House of Commons Commission and has been criticised by members. The judgment of House of Commons officials has already come under fire after it emerged that they allowed Sir Nicholas and Ann Winterton to claim rent for a property that they owned outright.
The refurbishment work was mostly carried out in 2006, the year that Malcolm Jack, the new clerk, took over, although some of the furnishings were installed after his arrival in spring last year.
Parliamentary sources said that Dr Jack would have been consulted during the makeover. The Clerk has sole use of 3 Parliament Street, worth £2.8 million on the open market, according to parliamentary authorities.
A spokesman for Parliament denied in November that the refurbishment was extravagant, telling a newspaper: “He has had a new kitchen, that’s all.” But The Times has seen documents calling this assertion into question. The extent of the overhaul includes:
- A new kitchen costing £39,146, including £2,694 for a granite work surface, £4,974 for appliances and £971 for flat-screen kitchen television and appliances.
- A guest bathroom for £4,652.
- A bespoke storage cupboard for £2,300, a Sherwood 2.5-seat sofa for £1,543 and black walnut Sherwood chairs for £3,666.
- A wood floor for £2,985, new carpets for £598 and a black slate hearth for £1,500. Curtains for £4,758.
- A butler’s tray and lamp table for £1,835 and knife-pleat empire lamp shades for £158.
The list also includes furniture polishing in the “patio area”, a ceramic table lamp, a £1,095 “deep clean” and the upholstering of chairs.
Several entries on the itemised list say only “furnishings” or “redecorations”. The total bill for spending on 45 separate items on the property between March 2005 and June 2007 is £102,254.82.
The Clerk acts as accounting officer for expenditure in the House of Commons, making him legally responsible for its budget and 1,600 employees. The Finance and Administration Department, often called the “Fees Office”, is answerable to both the House of Commons Commission and the Clerk as chief executive.
Sources involved in the running of Parliament said that MPs who oversee the administration of the Commons were not consulted on the refurbishment because it fell below the threshold for matters to be referred to MPs. The refurbishment would have been carried out by the works board, which comprises officers of the House. Sources added that it was right to carry out the refurbishment after the previous Clerk, Sir Roger Sands, left the job, but expressed surprised at the cost. These disclosures could lead to the threshold — of about £250,000 — being lowered.
This figure was reduced after MPs were not given the chance to approve the £435,000 cost of a covered walkway that connects two buildings inside Parliament. The parliamentary authorities refused last night to discuss the refurbishment.
Norman Baker, the Liberal Democrat MP, said: “I have, sadly, formed the view over many years that there is no proper scrutiny of expenditure within the House.
“The House of Commons commission approves almost any Bill that comes before them and it’s even worse. There are some Bills that appear to not even to reach it. It’s clear that the House is writing itself blank cheques at the taxypayers’ expense.”
The building at 3 Parliament Street is the largest property used by senior officers, taking up 405 sq m (4,360 sq ft). Though only 6 sq m larger than 2 Parliament Street, occupied by the Serjeant at Arms, it is thought to be worth £600,000 more.
When asked by an MP whether any consideration had been given to turning accommodation at 2 and 3 Parliament Street and 4 Canon Row into office space for MPs and their staff, the House of Commons Commission said that the buildings were “structurally unsuitable for use as offices”.
In 1991 the services committee heard that the buildings were “frail and vulnerable, giving rise to loading problems, even in standard office use”, opening the way for the properties to be converted into residences.
The Serjeant at Arms told MPs in 2006 that part of the reason the buildings were unsuitable for office use was because of their Grade 1 listing, meaning that “there are very few opportunities for making structural changes which would allow an increase in the number of rooms available”.
Many of the items could be obtained more cheaply. The Sherwood chairs can be found online for about £160 each. Ikea’s “Egon” chairs, which are similar in design, cost £55. The list also included two Ionic columns at a cost of £963.50. The Featuredeco.co.uk website offered similar “Corinthian columns” in fibreglass for £226 each.
3 Parliament Street
The house was thought to have been built in the 1750s after the thoroughfare now known as Parliament Street was created in 1732 allowing for direct communication between Whitehall and Westminister for the first time.
The Clerk of the House of Commons has sole use of 3 Parliament Street.
It would be worth £2.8 million on the open market. 3 Parliament Street is thought to be most expensive property used by senior House of Commons officers.
The Serjeant at Arms lives at 2 Parliament Street - worth £2.2million.
The Speaker's secretary has 4 Canon Row, with a market value of £1.6 million.
The Clerk, Dr Malcolm Jack, is the most senior official in the Commons and advises the Speaker, Michael Martin, on rules and procedures. While he has his own accommodation – the latest estimate suggest about 30 MPs are still obliged to share offices because of a lack of space on the parliamentary estate. Scores more have put their researchers and staff in separate offices dotted around the Commons. Source: Times database
The bill:
Supply & fit kitchen in 3 Parliament Street £10,000
Ceramics table lamp & shade £466
Graphica (5927B/34) Natural GRA05002 etc & handling £1670.61
Supply & fit appliances £4,974
Curtaining 3 Parliament Street £1,244.32
Supply of lamp etc £1,040
Bespoke storage cupboard -Clerk’s Residence, 1PS £2,300
Redecorations to 3PS £2,038.92
Part redecoration works (3PS) £4,500
Sherwood chairs (black walnut feel) £3,666.38
Supply/fit polished black slate hearth etc. £1,500
Sherwood 2.5 seat sofa £1,543.30
Kitchen Furniture, LG LCD TV & delivery £971.06
Lamp table & Butler’s tray £1,835
Granite work tops £2,694.20
Kitchen works at 3PS £6,197.29
3PS internal redecorations £500
Work to Bespoke Fitment (3PS) £250
Sitting room wood floor (3PS) £2,985
3PS new kitchen works £5910.35
3PS Deep Clean £800
Deep clean to 3PS £295.75
Kitchen installation & other works as instructed £8,400
Other expenditure £30,760
Total £96,542.16
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool/Teeside
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Its ironic that this shower are promoting removing (1st) homesfrom those who are not prepared work
Dick Head, Paris, France
It's about time that we looked more closley at MP's and their senior advisors. They are putting themselves above the law and getting away with it.
If these MP's were normal employees of a company HMRC - would expect that when an expense was claimed it could be backed up by appropriate receipts and invoices. If they can't substantiate the expense - it must be disallowed and taxed.
MP's should be provided with civil service secretarial services etc - paid by the taxpayer. Any additional staff they want should be paid out of their own pocket.
We should cut the number of MP's - does London really need 74 MP's?? I They should be cut by at least half.
MP's should also not be allowed to hold outside directorships - or act as consultants to industies - or businesses. They should concentate on the job in hand.
There more than generous holidays should be cut to we average workers get - 4-5 weeks a year.
There are other changes to be made to stop MP's abuse of taxpayers money.
Alan, Carshalton, Surrey
The old saying about government contracts being a licence to print money is clearly still true. £466 for a table lamp, and £1040 to supply and fit it! Tom Paxton had this worked out ages ago - look for a little song called "Sold a Hammer to the Pentagon (and they made me a millionaire)".
But not to worry, it's only the taxpayer paying, so presumably it's all okay, then.
Gill, Southampton, UK
This juicy story has surely been in a Whip's bottom drawer for some time, ready to be planted in the Press to warn off any Commons officials who might be considering unhelpful recommendations on transparency of expenses.
Well done Sam for conniving at the ruse!
Austin Lane, London,
Isn't it easy to spend other people money, especially when they have no say in the matter.
David Leslie, Perth, Scotland
Mr Chown, errr this is for a grace and favour apartment for an officer of the house. Who is emphatically not an MP.
Sandy Morrrison, London,
This just proves what we all knew anyway, that MPs are in it purely for the loot!
david chown, bath,
Why should anybody get a grace-and-favour home. Maybe, silly cynical me, it is too keep them under control.
Frederick, London, UK
It is apparent that MPs can not be trusted to run their expenses honestly. They are on a lucrative gravy train, whilst the rest of us have to make do with Failed Great Western ad their extortionate fares. In fact, it appear that MPs can not be trusted with very much at all.
Neil, Gloucestershire, England
Why is it that these public servants are able enjoy free housing (sometimes on a number of different properties) or to claim £37,000 p.a. (I understand) for the second homes required because of nature of their jobs? Some enjoy grace and favour homes, free of charge, and in addition claim the allowance. Other public servants i.e. members of the Armed Forces, pay rent for the accommodation they inhabit because of the nature of their jobs, unless on operational duty. Even Generals Admirals and Air Marshals pay rent on their accommodation. Most of us agree that our MPs need funding and support in order to do their jobs, but what is good for one set of public servants, must be good for all. It is time that an independent body decided which allowances are applicable, and not the dishonourable, or even honourable members themselves.
Steve Parselle, Bournemouth,
I see that MP's like to have their Doctorines. Well how about a People's Doctorine which states that the taxable treatment of the rest of us mortals is the same as that of MP's. This would mean that I can have a second property tax free for my job, not furnish receipts etc and heh I can even vote my own pay and pension increases. Sounds eminently sensible to me!
On a serious note, I like many other taxpayers who can are now moving their tax positions and domiciles overseas to less corrupt countries. With it I will take the jobs of the company that I own. So, MP's behaviour does have an impact after all.
td, Brighton, UK
I have no problem with key officials ensuring our seats of government are upgraded in manner in keeping with our nation's status and heritage. Imagine if in previous centuries our leaders took similarly penny-pinching decisions - we would lack the astounding wealth of historical buildings and interiors that have made us the the nation we are.
So a few grand on a posh kitchen for a house in our most famous street - get over it!
john hall, LONDON,
Being from Canada, I am usually amused by the distaste Brits have towards uPVC windows and their love all things period. But even I think that a house of this quality can't get away with Ikea chairs or fibreglass Corinthian columns. Its an expensive building with a Grade 1 listing, obviously any renovation is going to reflect that
Kyle, old windsor,
Other expenditure £30,760?????
I wish my accountant could allow me such a high percentage on other expenditure! on my business! without the tax man asking me questions!!
Mr K T Sharp, Port Erin , isle of man
A gravy train to the golden trough
These dishonourable members are not fit to empty our rubbish bins
john winston beatson, sheffield, england
Why are civil servants, including secretaries to the Speaker, living in multi-million pound properties? This just keeps getting better and better!
In many ways the money spent on this property has been, in the main, spent well since the sale of the property and increase in its value would be for the taxpayers advantage.
However, I am still unsure what MPs have been doing with taxpayers' money especially since they seem to unaccountable. My father was in the foreign service and their system of accommodation works well.
It is the government that either buys or rents the property for diplomatic staff and it is centrally managed. Why does this not happen for MPs. And why does the government not make arrangements to get hotel rooms at rack-rates for short term stay? Why are MPs who live within commuting distance of London get an allowance for a second home at all?
Many questions but a complete overhaul is urgently needed.
G Sharma, London,