Philip Webster, Political Editor
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Extra cash payments worth about £2,000 a year could be made to the lowest income families if they look for work, go on training schemes or acquire fresh skills, under plans being considered by Gordon Brown.
In what the Prime Minister terms a new programme to tackle child poverty, he will tell Labour activists today that he is looking at ways in which the Government can intervene – as in Scandinavia and New York – to help problem families to help themselves.
The incentives, which could also be paid if parents ensure that their children have regular health checks, are aimed at hauling families out of poverty.
Proposing a “contract out of poverty” between the State and low-income families, Mr Brown will say that while the Government will do all it can to liberate people from poverty, they must do all they can to help themselves as well.
Mr Brown’s speech will be a tacit admission that his crusade to end child poverty by 2020 needs additional momentum. A target to reduce it by one million by 2005 was out by 300,000, and the Conservatives claimed this month that it was rising again.
Hinting at additional state support Mr Brown will say it is the Government’s responsiblity to ensure that work pays for families with children in poverty, that work must be a route out of poverty, that the Government will look at helping parents who have a skills assessment and then take training to improve their job prospects.
Ministers are examining a scheme introduced in New York by Michael Bloomberg, the Mayor, called Opportunity NYC, which is testing whether temporary cash payments that provide incentives for work, education and health activities can help to combat poverty. This is aimed at specific inner-city areas, with high and persistent poverty. It covers 2,500 families.
Participating families receive bimonthly cash payments in return for specified activities, such as staying in full-time work or undertaking training. In the New York scheme, the payments will be available for two to three years, depending on available funding.
The actual payment amount per family will depend on the degree to which a family participates in the activities. They receive between £2,000 and £3,000 a year for ensuring regular health and dental checks, meeting their children’s teachers and doing activities to help themselves out of poverty.
The Government will look at whether elements of the programme relating to job training and work participation can be built on in particular areas in Britain.
Ministers are also anxious to learn from “family centres” in Scandinavia, where child poverty is among the lowest in Europe. The high-quality child-care and early years services in these countries mean that more women can work and families can earn more and move out of poverty.
Addressing the Welsh Labour conference in his first big party speech of the year, Mr Brown will say that for those families who are struggling the most the Government will offer more help.
He will pledge to build on successful programmes of support, such as family intervention projects, brought in to help families involved in persistent antisocial behaviour, but in return the families themselves must commit to play by the rules.
Mr Brown will say that “we’re just half way there to the opportunity revolution our country needs. An opportunity revolution to drive social mobility forward – which is the great mission of the next decade. For Labour, this is an enduring dream which is now a national imperative. For we are and have always been the party of opportunity for all.”
Mr Brown will say that a big rise in applications for university admissions is a vindication of Labour’s decision to make increases in student maintenance grants for the coming academic year. “As a result of the changes we made, two thirds of new students will now be entitled to maintenance grants. Now we are seeing the fruits of that policy,” he will say. “I want to go even further in future in supporting more young people, especially those from deprived communities, go to university and realise their full potential.”
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I think all people should be given enough to live on and people who work should be paid extra, then people who were unable to work would not be called lazy or scroungers and everyone would have the incentive to work as much as they could and wanted to. I also believe that anyone not reaching their potential is a wasted resource to their country.
Jill, Leeds,
Social engineering is doomed to failure, since it is futile to fight nature and is consequently the preserve of the arrogant and the naive.
Arrogance limits perspective and the naive have no perspective, consequently the actions of either group is always exemplified by stupidity of action irrespective of intelligence or education.
Keith Banks, Wembley, England
Goodbye McBroon, just pack your suitcase, more crackpot ideas.
Patricia Kenny, Bradford, West Yorkshire
the problem is most of these people already get maximum handouts so do not need to do any training or work to get a better living.it seems this goverment is consentrating on iradicating pentioners ( who have worked for there pentions) through fuel poverty and starvation to pay these people to do even less.
cliff williamson, spilsby lincolnshire, england
It doese'nt matter what you for some people, it never wil never
be enough for some, but the basic need for all childrens is two
parents-love, more then money, it's old saying"you ca'nt buy
everything in this world, think before bringing child in to this
selfish world; God help us all: Cllr Ken Tiwari(Oxford UK)
Cllr Kenn Tiwari (Independent), Oxford, United Kingdom
There are times when you ca'nt satisfie some people, least of
all the children need two parents more then the money, why
would not make more strict condition, bringing children in to
this selfish-world, you must have ability to raise them with-love
and not just bread&butter, it's responsibility of both mum&dad,
how about doing something on those line, before passing any
more legilation ! Dear PM.
Ken
Cllr Kenn Tiwari (Independent), Oxford, United Kingdom
Yet more confusing benefits, many of which leave those earning their way in life no better off than those on benefits.
Surely one of our problems is the proliferation of gratuitus handouts to those on benefits putting them in a better overall position than many of those not qualifying for all these benefits. We all have to earn our way in life - how true Alan Sugar's coverage was last week end. I bet Brown will not listen to his advice.
William, Sevenoaks, UK
Perhaps the best method for help would be for the government to stop taking so much of our money in taxes and national insurance, lifting many people from 'making ends meet' to earning enough money to save and help themselves.
John Scott, London,
Brown seems to have abandoned any attempt to keep tax and benefits simple. Anyone who is entitled to any of these social payments will need an accountant to claim them. These things are a nightmare for claimants, employers and the benefits agency.
Ashley Meredith, Granada, Spain
All these new initiatives will not work if, as has happened so many times in the past 10 years, there is no consideration of the effect on the total income of a person taking them up. They must also not end up as short term benefits but cause long term complications for their families. In my past experience by taking up short term Government training programmes I have excluded myself from elegibility for more long term benefits. One particular example is the interaction of Working Persons Tax Credit on Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit. and the amount of time it takes for them to ge paid out correctly. If I take a Part Time job on the minimum wage and get WTC 85% of it will be deducted from Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit. A marginal Tax rate at over 40% is considered penal by the richest 10% of the nation so why should 85% be accepted by the poorest.
Phil White, Bristol, UK