Philip Webster, Political Editor, and Rebecca O’Connor
The quintessential Bond girl. Diamonds are Forever, free with The Times today
Northern Rock faces being shrunk to half its present size, with big job losses, under plans drawn up to satisfy European Union competition rules, The Times was told last night.
Alistair Darling will tell Brussels today that he wants to continue giving state aid to the bank, which was nationalised last month after ministers decided it was the only way to get it through its troubles. But the radical slimming down, which could mean that thousands of the bank’s 6,500 jobs will go, is judged by the Treasury to be necessary to meet the EU’s stringent rules for helping firms.
The difficulties in the mortgage market are underlined today by figures showing that about 250,000 home-owners will face a £1,000 or more rise in mortgage repayments when they come off their existing deals this year.
It also follows a traumatic weekend in New York after the collapse and bail-out of Bear Stearns, the investment bank. Investors are braced for more turmoil today as fall-out continues to shake stock markets. The situation forced Henry Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, to promise that the Administration was “prepared to do what it takes” to support troubled financial institutions.
The full business plan for Northern Rock, being drawn up by Ron Sandler, its government-appointed chairman, will not be ready for about two weeks, when Mr Darling will make a Commons statement. But the Chancellor is fully aware of its direction and will notify the European Commission today of the broad details to enable it to begin an investigation. Approval of the original rescue plan expires today.
To be successful he has to convince Brussels that the bank can be viable over the long term without taxpayer help and that it will curtail some of its current activities to balance the competitive advantage it has by getting government help over its banking rivals. It cannot be allowed to maintain a market-leading position.
Figures published with the Budget showed that the Treasury expects Northern Rock to repay £10 billion of its £24 billion Bank of England loans in the next financial year. That means the bank will take on far less new mortgage business than in the past and some borrowers coming to the end of fixed-term loans will be advised to look elsewhere. The Times was told that the £110 billion mortgage book could eventually be cut in half.
Meanwhile, about 213,000 borrowers who took out cheap five-year, fixed-rate deals in 2003 will face rises of more than £100 a month when they remortgage. The best rate available on a five-year deal in 2003 had a rate of 3.94 per cent. The lowest rate on offer with an equivalent deal now is 5.58 per cent. The difference in monthly repayments on a £150,000 loan is £141.
Experts gave warning that the payment shock would hit “safety-first” borrowers, who had chosen the longer-term deals in preference to cheaper two-year fixed rates because they offered more security. This group includes young families in their second and third homes, as well as couples approaching retirement who have only a few years left on their mortgage term.
David Hollingworth, of the mortgage broker London & Country, said: “In 2003 these people got a cracking deal and were rewarded for their cautiousness but borrowers now need to prepare for a rise in repayments.”
The Council of Mortgage Lenders reported a surge in the popularity of fixed rate mortgages in mid2003 as the deals became cheaper. About 5 per cent of borrowers on fixed-rate loans say that they have no idea how they will meet their repayments when their current deal expires, according to Mortgage Monitor, the online broker.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
View the 50 greenest companies in an interactive, searchable table
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Direct from the farms

Overseas contacts and local business information
2006/56
£37,995
South West England
1998/R
£8,250
Inside M25
2006/06
£40,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Six Figure Package
Royal Mail
London
Management Roles
Barclaycard
Northampton
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Affordable Key Worker quality 1 bed apartments through part buy, part rent with Dominion Housing Group
Globrix the Property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
£
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
Visit the Entertainment Capital of the World!
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Buying out Northern Rock as a face saving manoeuvre for New Labour's northern heartland has badly backfired on Darling. As for the former private shareholders, they took a punt that went belly-up and should take their loss philosophically: which is not to be taken as condoning the smug crowing of the anti-shares brigade.
Private investors have almost no say in running large companies, that is done by financial institutions, like pension companies. If there are people to blame, it is the directors of those institutions: they have failed to manage their investment prudently.
Mike, Exeter, England
Labour never learn, they pretend there not socialist but as soon as the ecconomy hits a significant decision making milestone, what happens? they nationalise, because its there nature, they cannot bare to let the market work.
Look at america, Bear Stearn got into trouble last week and has already been sold to JP Morgan- fine the american govt leant tens of billions of dollars, but thats what the Bank of england should have done far more efficiently with Northern Rock- thats its role as the lender of last resort.
To actually nationalise a bank, means labour has commited itself to nationalise any bank that gets into trouble. Imagine if Barclays gets into serious trouble how many hundreds of billions of pounds would tax payers have to pay? why should some tax payers be forced to spend hundreds or thousands or more pounds of their own money to bail out other tax payers who have been unlucky?
i know its harsh- but it should be sale or bankruptcy
will, london, england
The view expressed above that shareholders and depositors in NR are "all investors in the company, just in differrent ways" is wrong-headed. A shareholder receives Annual Reports, has the right to attend AGMs, and plays a part (albeit a small one) in electing Directors - depositors have none of these benefits when it comes to judging the viability of a bank or building society. That is why the Financial Services Authority is responsible for protecting depositors' interests - or at least that is what most savers thought before the NR debacle.
Geoff Bobker, London, UK
The NR story gets more distorted all the time. Firstly, it has not (yet) cost us, the taxpayer, a penny - the Govt have effectively bought an non-liquid but still solvent bank. The Branson and other offers, would certainly have incurred risks and costs well above the promised reward. No Govt could accept that outcome.
Second, I see no reason why shareholders and depositors should be treated the same - equity carries risk, it must do - the rewards are higher. Shareholders are advised repeatedly to diversify. Moreover, had Messrs Brown and Darling not nationalized (the Tores favoured option), there would have been a fire sale and the owners would have got nothing. If you are in a "hole" Mr Steer, it is of your own making.
Richard Marshall, Manchester, UK
Well, at least those who lose their jobs will know that it is for good reason - to satisfy the unelected administrators of Brussels! I am sure they'll sleep better for that.
Nick Beard, Rotherham, UK
Remind me again why it was so important to "save" Northern Rock?
Apparently it wasn't to save the jobs, so why was it? Does anyone remember?
You'd think that at a cost to the taxpayer of ninety billion there would have been some good reason to buy the thing, no?
jon livesey, Sunnyvale, CA/USA
No mention of the thousands of shareholders, who like me held on to their shares when the government talked positively about the viability of the company, whilst they (at the same time) talked the share prices down.
The government nationalised a company which was by their own admission viable. Yet, when faced with having to comapensate the shareholsers, they instruct an 'independent' valuer to calculate the level of compensation payable for a company in administration.
...and let's not forget the commonly voiced view that the shareholders "knew what they were getting themelves into and should get nothing", while the same people say that the depositors "should lose nohting": The interest of the shareholders and the depositors should have been viewed as being one and the same, as they are all investors in the company, just in different ways.
David Seer, mytown, Britain (the hole!)