Sam Coates, Chief Political Correspondent
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Gordon Brown is risking the wrath of the Queen by scrapping plans for a new
passenger jet to take ministers and members of the Royal Family on overseas
trips.
In a surprise announcement, the Government said that it had abandoned the £100
million plans to lease two new aircraft.
Jim Fitzpatrick, a junior Transport Minister, said that the decision had been
taken because of rising running costs and Mr Brown’s rules introduced last
year insisting that ministers take scheduled flights where possible.
Instead the Prime Minister has authorised the Royal Family to buy a small jet
with 10-15 seats that can only be used inside Britain, a government
spokeswoman said. The jet will be paid for by the Department for Transport
and ministers will be allowed access to British flights. No budget has been
allocated for the aircraft.
For overseas trips, ministers and royalty will have either to use scheduled
flights or charter commercial aircraft. Currently ministers and the Royal
Family use 32 (The Royal) Squadron, but this will be unavailable after April
1 next year.
The Gershon review in 2004 recommended that the Government buy two dedicated
aircraft: an Airbus seating 70-80 and a smaller executive jet for 15-20
passengers for European travel.
The idea of a dedicated aircraft for the Prime Minister and Royal Family, then
dubbed “Blair Force One” after the US President’s Air
Force One, had been considered at different times throughout Tony
Blair’s premiership. Mr Blair agreed to lease the aircraft, which would have
cost about £100 million, last May as one of his final acts as Prime
Minister. At the time, the Conservatives opposed the decision saying it sent
“totally the wrong message”.
He approved the decision after he had to fly to a European summit in Brussels
in 2006 on board a plane displaying Austrian livery. Before Christmas,
Gordon Brown travelled to the Middle East in a private Swiss jet.
But yesterday Mr Fitzpatrick revealed that Mr Brown had decided to scrap the
plans for both aircraft and opt instead for one smaller jet. The move could
anger the Queen, who is understood to have been pressing for the new
aircraft The Queen would have had priority in using the aircraft. But while
she used RAF flights only seven times between 2004 and 2005, Mr Blair used
the RAF Queen’s Flight on 677 occasions since 1997.
Nicholas Soames, the Tory MP and a friend of the Prince of Wales, called the
decision shameful. He said: “It’s important for the Queen and the dignity of
the Royal Family to be transported properly. It’s a very unnecessary and
foolish thing to do.”
Mr Fitzpatrick insisted that his department had worked closely with the Royal
Household, No 10 and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to reach the
decision. He said: “I am today recommending that the needs of the users of
this service can best be met through procuring a small aircraft for official
travel within the UK, chartered air services for longer journeys involving
small parties, and a continuation of existing arrangements with UK airlines
for journeys involving large parties. This approach ensures better value for
money for the taxpayer whilst also minimising the environmental impact of
royal and ministerial air travel, producing an estimated 10 per cent saving
on CO2 emissions.”

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This must be how McBroon has funded his latest gift of $11 million to Afganistan !
Martin Briggs, Heversham, England
The amazingly stupid thing about the decision is that it was taken to reduce costs which wont work as the long term use of charters over say 20yrs for the royal family and MP's (First Class of course)
would pay for the cost of the plane a few times over. Also as others have mentioned it would be more secure and a great flag flying type excercise.
Anyhow another daft short sighted decision.
Euan Steawrt, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Why doesn't the Queen just use the Royal Yacht? Oh, wait, I forgot. Mr. Blair already got rid of that.
John F. McIlray, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
Sam Coates you are wrong when you say "The jet will be paid for by the Department for Transport " WRONG. The tax payer pays for it.
steve tea, manchester, cheshire
The Queen has lasted long enough without one so why bother now? Maybe if minsters and Royal family memebrs were made to travel a bit more like the general public then maybe they would be a bit more in touch.
Stuart Murray, Amsterdam, Nethrlands
This decision has to be construed as total bilge, founded as it is on old fashioned class prejudice and the need to appease the left wing of the Labour Party. It follows on from the senseless decision to scrap the Royal Yacht Britannia. The Queen and the Royal Family are special, they are not like cabinet ministers, not least because they are good value for money and work at least as hard at representing the nation. The reference to environmental issues is a total red herring, and has obviously been tacked on to give this sad decision some veneer of acceptability. Mr Brown must think we are indeed simple, if he expects us swallow this load of horse feathers.
tom Moncur, Blandford Form, Dorset
Bring on the republic...
HM, London,
The queen wants a plane? Suggestion: Buy one Ma'am.
Then rent it out back to the gov as a private charter service. If it can make money for a business to do so, then the queen (with hundreds of years of breeding in how to run things - like a country say) should have no problem
Nick, Plymouth,
A deplorable decision. Brown thinks he is the Head of state, as Blair did before him.
JohnF, Peterborough,
It is ridiculous that the royal family and high ranking government officials do not have secure air transport for long range flights. Depending on civilian airlines to handle this aspect of transportation is folly and a disaster waiting to happen.
Jason, Pittsburgh, USA
Billions have been wasted on government IT projects and the goverment believes it can't justify a minsterial jet? What planet are these people on? There is cutting costs and there is stupidity.I understand reducing MPs trinkets but for official business this just shows that the politicians have forgotten the two things that they should be good at - PR and symbolism. If this lot can't do those correctly, then what can they do? As for the media shouting about the expense, I am beginning to get distinctly bored with it (the media that is)
John, Knutsford, UK
Can PM Brown guarantee the security of a chartered plane in the same way the RAF can? That's the only real question on the table.
Besides that there is the matter of image. Don't be so cheap Gordon, buy an A380 with a big Union Jack on it and give us something to brag about!
Scott Millson, Toronto, Canada
Money would be better spent on the RAF itself..The Queen could always use a Nimrod !!!.....Sorry Ma'am getting at your Government not you.
kirk, Rotherham, UK
i think it's disgusting that the Queen does not have her own plane for overseas travel. How does that make the UK look to other countries? Poor
Michelle, Bristol,
Whats wrong with the train for journeys inside the UK as well as Paris and Brussels? They should lead the way in encouraging people to take the most environmentally friendly form of transport possible.
Luke Nicolaides, London, UK
Scrap Gordon brown Ma'm - send him to the Tower !!!
Ian Payne, WALSALL,
PC brigade and spin doctors. Britain is and should be a top ten industrialized nation. We must project an image of power and confidence to other nations. The cost of these aircraft is paltry in the overall scheme of things and would have aided our reputation and image abroad. There is also another aspect. Senior ministers travelling on scheduled airlines create problems related to their security and can impact ordinary passengers.
Hamad Lone, Lomdon, England
Take £100million from the Department for International Development handouts and spend it on restoring some pride in the UK.
Angus, Sutton,
Britain is not one of the wealthiest countries on earth,
it's close to bankrupt when you take into account
Browns insane borrowing. It was wealthy when Labour came to power now as always they have stuffed things up.
Barry Holmes, Christchurch, New Zealand
Stop comparing a ministerial plane to the US Air Force One, as though they are the only country that has such a thing. Every western nation has a ministerial jet, except Britain! So do countries such as Brazil, Mexico and India. British PMs are the laughingstock of every G8 summit, when they arrive in a clapped-out plane rented for the occasion, or when it breaks down and leaves them stranded, or even worse, when they have to step off a RyanAir budget flight! Britain is one of the wealthiest countries on Earth, yet spending a bit of cash to let our reps look good overseas launches an insane backlash from the media, and the government follows suit. A ridiculous embarrassment!
Jasper Reed-Spencer, London, England