Angus Macleod, Scottish Political Editor and Sam Coates
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
Members of the Scottish Parliament are calling for Alex Salmond to stand down
from Westminster after he spent more than £130,000 in expenses and staffing
costs as an MP during a period in which he visited the Commons six times.
Scotland’s Nationalist First Minister, who also represents Banff &
Buchan at Westminster, was accused by Labour of “taking the taxpayer for a
ride” with the bill, run up between April and December last year. Labour,
exploiting a rare opportunity to embarrass him, calculated that the First
Minister’s overnight stays had cost the public purse £2,331 a night.
Mr Salmond’s aides pointed out last night that he had participated in a higher
percentage of votes than any other First Minister who had also been an MP.
Details of Mr Salmond’s Commons expenses were released to Lord Foulkes of
Cumnock, the Labour MSP, under freedom of information legislation. The
figures showed that Mr Salmond, who takes an MP’s salary, claimed £13,988.98
in rent for a flat in Westminster and £84,664.94 for his parliamentary
staff. Incidental expenses amounted to £18,591.34, while Mr Salmond’s travel
expenses were £1,480.80. He also claimed £2,081.85 in travel for his staff
and £293.50 in travel expenses for his wife, Moira. He received £2,221.84
under the communication allowance, £1,017.37 for stationery, £4,768.25 for
postage and £1,255.46 for computing.
It was noted that Mr Salmond had been in the Commons only six times since he
became First Minister and had voted only 18 times.
Jackie Baillie, the Labour MSP, said that it would have been cheaper for Mr
Salmond to have stayed at the Ritz. Ms Baillie, the Shadow Minister for
Parliamentary Business and Constitutional Affairs, said: “It’s a bit rich
for the SNP to denounce Westminster at every turn only for Alex Salmond to
claim every expense going. It demonstrates at best a cavalier attitude to
seeking value for public money - at worst it’s shameless behaviour, as he
barely attends the UK Parliament.”
Mr Salmond responded: “I published these expenses three weeks ago when a
freedom of information request came in. I wrote to the Speaker and said that
in my view we should publish MPs’ expenses quarterly, as the Scottish
Parliament does.
“I employ staff. I do the work of a constituency MP and I think I will be
about 500th in the expenses league table. I am one of the few MPs who does
not take advantage of the mortgage option in London [by claiming mortgage
interest]. I rented a flat, and gave notice when Gordon Brown bottled the
election in October. That ran out in December and I moved out.
“I’ve been in Westminster every week for the last month but I just stay
overnight in hotels because it is cheaper than renting a flat. This is a
pitiful effort from Labour.”
Mr Salmond’s aides added that Mr Salmond was a more active parliamentarian at
Westminster than any other First Minister or Deputy First Minister serving a
dual mandate. The late Donald Dewar voted only 17 times in the Commons in
his first ten months as First Minister, and Henry McLeish did not vote at
all in the Commons during the same period.
‘Cheaper at the Ritz’
Flat rental £13,988.98
Parliamentary staff £84,664.94
Incidental expenses £18,591.34
Travel £1,480.80 Staff travel £2,081.85
Wife’s travel £293.50
Communications £2,221.84
Stationery £1,017.37
Postage £4,768.25
Computers £1,255.46
TOTAL £130,364.33
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love.
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Allow Times Online TV show, Perfect Pets help you make the the right pet decisions
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Direct from the farms

Overseas contacts and local business information
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
£60k plus excellent benefits
Barclaycard
Stockton / Northampton
£
£55,000 - £75,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Incidental expenses £18,591.34!!!!â¦what on earth is this for? As a tax payer and therefore one of the many [involuntary] suppliers of this money it is only fair that we, the British Public, are entitled to know this. Most of the people of this country havenât even got that amount to live on. And why isnât it listed âmore specificallyâ? Is it in reality for âentertainmentâ??
Bob, Warrington, Cheshire
Money well spent as far as I'm concerned. Alex Salmond works two or three times as hard as any other MP I know and rarely spends a night in his own bed. He represents a large seat in the Scottish Highlands and travels continually to service it. He is renowned as the MP who deals efficiently and properly with every constituents problem no matter how small or how taxcng and immediately. I can assure you he pays a lot of staff and they all work their butts off - or they dont work for him. This rubbish comes fro the pathetic outfit called the Labour Party in Scotland many of whom are complete strangers to a day's work. My previous MSP (an unheard of LibDem) knocked off nearly £70,000 in office expenses on God knows what.
David McEwan Hill, Dunoon, Argyll
If you work in the public sector, then expenses should be published on a regular basis. After all, we pay the wages.
Shaun, Blairgowrie, Scotland
I am not sure how any one can judge whether these costs are reasonable or not on the limited information given. But to simply condem based on an overall amount alone only fans the flames without addressing the rootcause - how to avoid MPs abusing the expenses system. It is unreasonable that MP's should be expected to meet work related costs out of their own salary. (how many company workers are willing to do this ?) However unlike a normal job there is a grey line between personal & private activites. Maintaining 2 homes & offices seems to be the biggest cost in these expenses and it is right that MP's should not meet additional costs themselves, however if this results in a windfall profit eg sale profit from the London flat , MPs should be made to pay back the amount of mortgage support they received upon realisation of this profit. Nit picking over expense details is timewasting and achieves little, rather overhaul the system to meet modern transparency and control requirements
A Mason, London, UK
Chris, what planet are you on, there are plenty of people even if the funding was halved. It is the myth put out by MPs that they are hard done to. What stops people standing as independant MPs is that most cannot compete with the Party campaign funding machines.
A Williams, Stockton-on-Tees,
No wonder the MPs want to keep their expenses secret
Tony, Manchester , uk
Lets see every single one !
Expenses published please!
Actually ,forget the please! Publish all MPs, MEPs and MSPs expenses!
Disgruntled Dorothy, Glasgow, Scotland
That must be some kitchen.
Derek Smith, brighton, UK
the labour just cant help it , up to there ears in sleaze,but still
jealous,because he BEAT them last year, jackie(the hut)baillie
STILL HURTS .....>
M Macmerry, west lothian, scotland
I challenge any person to be more cost effective and do the job. This is without borrowing from friends and family or being independently funded/sponsored. The requirement is to run 2 offices including 4 salaried staff( one in London). Remember parliament is unpredictable making reduced fares difficult.
To do so with a max secure income of 4 years and with parliament unable to meet deposits or an element of capitol repayment in the mortgage.( ie the sum you had at the start is exactly the sum you have at the end.)
If indeed our current 'generous' funding encourages more people to put themselves forward to represent their local people plus a high media profile of their private lives, then it can only support society.
I fear instead that the critics would not wish to take on the job even if they had the abilities and that the criticism of MPs remuneration is just one more step towards the devaluation of our elected democracy.
chris, birmingham,
No wonder people want to become politians with these kind of expence claims. If it was his own money the total would be somewhat lower. Much lower! I am sure that Mr Salmond will give some heartbreaking story about how he does'nt have two pennies to rub together. Doubtless to say he is probably over worked as well and is down to his last three cars. I'm sure he will tell us that he has not broken any rules either. Yes well none of us would, if we, like them, made the rules we had to live by. Legal theft is still theft which ever way you look at it. I wonder how he sleeps? Well very easily it would seem at 2331 pounds per night!
Jeff Donnelly, Durham, UK
Just get rid of all the Scottish MP's they all seem to be milking their expenses as long as the English tax payer pays.
Barry Holmes, Christchurch, New Zealand
Before any politicians call for Alex Salmond to resign they should be prepared to declare their own level of expenses first.It should be widely known that Salmond represents a rural constituency, many hundreds of miles from london so his expenses are going to look high in any case.It will be interesting to find out the level of expenses for MPs from urban constituencies.
Those who cast the first stone......
PS how much did Lord Foulkes claim on his drinks expenses???
martin, Dundee, Scotland
So Labour think he should step down over these expenses which mostly look like reasonable costs for staff to do his constituency work and he will not make a profit from these.
Strange but we should perhaps as all the MP's calling for him to resign to publish their expenses so we can actually compare like for like.
joe, Edinburgh, Scotland
What can one say other than God deliver me from the extortionate modern political establishment?
John C, Berkhamsted, England
I notice an important fact here. By not owning a flat and then claiming rent he will not be making any money from the property.
I wonder how many MP's own a flat and then charge the tax payer while they make a fortune from the london property market.
All MP's should publish all the expenses.
John, London,
It will be so interesting to see what is disclosed by other MPs when disclosure is forced upon them, disclosure in this case having been made voluntarily.
matthew, Stirling, Scotland