Jack Malvern
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
A retired engineer nicknamed “Mole Man”, because of his fondness for burrowing tunnels under his home, has been ordered to pay almost £300,000 to the local council after his hobby nearly caused his house to collapse.
William Lyttle, 77, spent 40 years excavating a maze of tunnels beneath his 20-room Victorian property in Hackney, East London, before the council intervened.
The £300,000 charge, representing the cost of repairs carried out by the council, is believed to be the highest in a “public nuisance” case.
Inspectors discovered that parts of the house were supported by nothing more than household appliances and that ceilings had fallen in as a result of his extensive “home improvements”.
Mr Lyttle also dug out holes around his home, in which he placed a range of items including cars and boats.
The London Borough of Hackney had Mr Lyttle evicted in 2006 so council workmen could move in and save the house and a neighbouring property. The pavement outside was also affected.
Judge McKenna, presiding at the hearing at the High Court in London, ordered Mr Lyttle to pay £283,026 for the repairs and £10,000 in legal costs.
He also imposed an injunction on Mr Lyttle to prevent him undoing any of the work completed so far on site.
Simon Butler, representing the council, said in his written submissions that Mr Lyttle had used assorted items such as a fridge-freezer and a bath to prop up portions of his home. “There were poles which had been used to prop sections of floor, which were clearly bowing out of vertical due to the excessive load which the building had been subjected to,” he wrote.
“Mr Lyttle had extended below the existing basement to the property and mined the two main garden areas. He had also undermined and cut away at the foundation of the neighbouring property.”
Mr Butler said Mr Lyttle was ordered by Thames Magistrates Court to take down or repair the house in May 2006, but failed to comply, and the council moved in to undertake the work.
He told the court: “Mr Lyttle has been obstructive, has issued numerous applications in the County Court and the Royal Courts of Justice over the last five years, and has caused the council to incur unnecessary expenses abating a nuisance he has created, because he fails to use his land in a reasonable manner.”
Mr Lyttle, who defended himself in court, was given 14 days to pay.
Judge McKenna, giving his judgment, said the costs bills were reasonable.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Ha!
O dear that house is rightfully his?
So why shouldn't he ba aloud to 'burow' underneath it?
Thats like someone moving furniture around there home and then have to pay the council money because you made too much noise, or you scratched the floor!
Utterly Stupid !!
Nicole , Reading, England
it was lucky he did not bring the house down on himself and other people. i know you need planning permission but it is his house.
joshua cole, southampton, england
Bravo Mr Lyttle!!!This kind of action is unprecedented in normal urban surroundings.If he were an 'artist' he would have won the turner prize 3 times over,an inverse Rachel Whiteread doing the work himself without a team of assistants and postmodern theorists to produce and justify...
rama, london,
Is he, as you say, a 'nutter?'
Zach Winn, Ithaca, NY
'If it is truely HIS house it is no one elses business what he does with it. '
It is his house. We live oppoiste the house - I can assure you that the Moleman's work was very dangerous to others - at one point he put corrugated iron sheeting on the roof held by ropes - one could easily have come loose and taken someone's head off in the street. The structure of the hosue was also unsafe.There has to be some limit on the amount of dereliction a homeowner is allowed to get away with.
Mark, London,
Hmm, I've often fancied having a basement. Maybe London Transport could take over the tunnels?
John Ledbury, Kings Lynn, England
We need to remember that he wasn't just putting his and other peoples property at risk, he was risking his and his neighbours' lives.
Fee, London,
The man is not stupid. He knew that one day he'd be caught out (digging) and possibly jailed. Thats why he had been training for almost 40 years in the art of tunneling. Obviously this will secure his "escape" from any high security prison. All this time he has been preparing for his great escape...Or has he been watching too many movies? lol
jayil, london, uk
I propose that Mr Lyttle and his local council team up and open the underground workings to the public. They'd get their money back, and we'd get a chance to view this breathtaking piece of eccentricity.
Conrad, Canterbury,
haha.... this guy is a legend. lol. getting court permits to block any council work.. putting fridges and tumble dryers as foundation pillars is ingeneous if he wanterd to save space in his house. lol. public nuisance it because when, the outside pavement was damaged by his 'building work'. lol. he actually went to the royal courts of justice to prevent the council from intruding in his plans. lol. A Nuisance he was.. alas, he can't eb thaaat poor if he owns a 20 room victorian house in londond.. and he can't eb senile if he had the brains to apply for court injunctions against the council and their intrusions..clever old crazy man, lots of mooney,m will probably pay it off and tell 'em to go away./
Funny though, i do wonder what his intentions were with these "holes". lol.
Usman, Luton, , UK
glad to see the council have sprung, cat-like, into action. Having lived there ten years ago and cycled past his collapsing embarrasment of a caved in subsiding dump every day, I congratulate the authorities for their prompt action.
Oddly, my parking fines came through just lickety-split, and thyey never seemed to wait for the odd decade nor (if I may stretch a point) the passing of the millenium to threaten me with prosecution...
gratefully expatriated, kuwait, kuwait
Legally you can't "booby trap" your house in case of an emergency, and people have to enter. While it is YOUR house it can't be dangerous to the people trying to save your life if it catches fire. Also this probably fails all sorts of building code violations and structure issues after the modifications.
Sean, Indianapolis,
Hal, many of the properties in London are on 99 near leases from the Royal family.
Dan, New York, NY, USA
"If it is truely HIS house it is no one elses business what he does with it"
Tell that to his neighbour who has had his property damaged by this person's activities.
David Croft, North Vancouver, Canada/ British Columbia
I suppose the council had some rights if this was affecting a neighbouring property, however it is his land and his house and he is free to do as he wishes with respect of his house. Am I right in saying he was actually burying large objects such as cars? Well, his land or not that is an environmental issue which the council would intervene in. I donât think they have a right to evict him and go boldly into his house and do the repairs if he doesnât want them.
The cost is a joke to be honest, and the poor man is obviously in need of some help psychologically, the man is 77 years old too.
The system in this country sucks, and councils have too much power to do too many things, and refuse to do things like clean up our streets from anti-social behaviourism and vandalism. They always seem to attack decent vulnerable people and not do anything about those who should be subjected to the heavy hand of the law.
He did some wrong, but on the whole I feel sorry for him, despite his eccentricity.
DJ, Ayrshire, UK
I assume that Judge McKenna determined that the costs bills were reasonable, based on the cost of providing his services.
C Byrne, Pinner, UK
My question is: Did he ever reach China?
Curt, Houston, Texas, USA
only mad dogs and englishmen.
jcp, New York, New York
In America, If you live within city limits you have to apply for a permit to make improvements to your property, and these have to be inspected and approved upon completion. It seems a little irrritating, to pay for permission to work on your own home, but if you ever buy a house where there has been 'improvements' that are substandard, you begin to see the logic.
Mr. Lyttle was a a little nuts.
Hi Hal
Randall Larsen
Mansfield TX
Randall, Mansfield , Texas
My understanding has always been that any work that you carry out to your house which results affects the building structurally (in which I would include undermining and underpinning with household appliances!) require Building Regulations approval. I would love to see his structural calculations justifying the load bearing capacity of a fridge!
Anna, kendal, uk
Not much of an engineer if he didn't know digging out underneath the basement would destablise the house........ I too would love to know what he used the tunnels for .
Redandover60, Hayes, Middlesex, England
I suspect the council will seize the house to "pay" the fine and then rent it to Lee Jasper for £93.75 a month. After an extensive renovation programme, of course.
Roger Thornhill, LondonUK, UK
No one's property is actually theirs. It used to belong to the monarchy and now it belong to the government.
No one owns their property absolutely which is why we have to pay council tax and apply for planning permission to do anything with it.
Yes I know the laws here are completely stupid. You pay £400,000.00 for a decent house which you don't isn't really yours.
C, London,
Hal Thurow, Mansfield, USA Texas - i would agree that its noone elses business what he does with his house but when hios neighbours house gets affected and the pavement outside does to then he makes it other peoples business, rtfa
Dave, UK,
To Hal Thurow, I would point out that the item refers to the damage caused by Mr Lyttle to the neighbouring property and the pavement outside, so it isn't just his own proprty that he is damaging.
Richard, Manchester,
Where did he put the earth he excavated? Did he persuade his friends to walk about with the trousers stuffed full of soil?
Ian Kemmish, Biggleswade, UK
If it is truely HIS house it is no one elses business what he does with it. If it is not his house then it is deceptive to say it is his. If someone lead him to believe it is his, when it is not, they should be held responsible for decieving him.
Hal Thurow, Mansfield, USA Texas
WHY has Mr Lyttle been doing this? Is this pure 'off the chart' eccentricity or did he have some purpose?
Mike, Balsall Common, UK