Rosemary Bennett, Social Affairs Correspondent
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
All mothers should be entitled to a weekly payment of £55 to help to cover childcare costs, even if they do not go out to work, a think-tank close to David Cameron has recommended.
The proposals for a flat-rate Parental Care Allowance (PCA) for all mothers with children under three will be considered by Conservative policy chiefs. Policy Exchange said the current system of means-tested subsidies was unfair both to better-off working mothers, who do not qualify, and to mothers who stay at home.
Labour targets childcare subsidies to low-paid working families through the tax credit system.
Policy Exchange said UK parents paid 70 per cent of childcare costs compared with an average 30 per cent elsewhere in the EU. This was despite total spending of £17 billion since 1997.
It was particularly unfair, it said, that most parents (59 per cent) got no help at all, either because the mother stayed at home, or because grandparents and friends helped out.
Of the 41 per cent who used formal childcare, most preferred individual care by a nanny or child minder to the collective day-care of a nursery, Policy Exchange said. Yet subsidies were heavily skewed towards the latter.
The scheme would cost £5.4 billion a year, and be paid for in part by scrapping the childcare element of Working Tax Credit, worth £1.4 billion. Policy Exchange also suggests that benefit for 16 to 18-year-olds should be cut, the Sure Start maternity grant for very low income homes should be scrapped, and that spending on Sure Start children’s centres be scrutinised.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Why is this just for mothers? Im a single father so will this exclude me? Surely in this day and age of anti-sexism etc it is an oversight on their part?
michael head, southampton, uk
Good idea. Stayathome parenting is excellent for kids, but ONLY if parent wants to be there. This will for the first time ever create true choices for parents. Mums who really want to care at home can do so and mums who wish to work can use this to pay for childcare. Good for society and fair to all
Mel, North West,
To all those of you who don't think families should get help because you have no kids: think about the kind of people who you want around when you are old and defenceless. We want ones that have been set a good example to care and do right, as a sahm, I work hard to bring my children up to be that.
Mel, North West,
As 40% or so of fathers are doing as much child care as mothers or more, are fathers entitled to this?
Are parents who share the care of their children but both work entitled to this?
Are separated fathers who share the care of the children going to get a respective % of this payment?
Are grandparents and other extended family excluded if they are watching the children?
When are politicians going to get the message that we need to promote inclusive policies that include fathers, grandparents and other extended family?
Rather than the further sexist policies that keep mothers in the home only and fathers at work only. Each individual family should be able designate the payments as fits their circumstances and not on prescribed govt gender targets.
JB, Surrey,
As I don't have any kids can I just send my entire wage packet to the closest family.
Roger, Surrey,
When will we move away from the nanny state? What gaurantee is there that this money will be utilized for childcare? Perhaps the answer is for the government to "outsource" childcare for all working mothers for children between 1 year and four years.
Hamad Lone, London, England
The current tax credits system gives money to mothers for childcare costs, but requires real proof that the child benefits from any formal care at all. Like the rest of the tax credits system this allows fraud on a massive scale. I hope a Tory government will address this whole area with a lot more practical common sense that Labour, who have thrown billions of our money down the drain in poorly thought out ineffectual glossy schemes.
Andrew Piercy, Northampton, England
Mike
it is a surreal part of being a father that everything to do with your child's welfare is targetted at the mother. Bureacrats seem to live in the late 19th Century
Peter, London,
If they can't afford them don't have them. who is going to pay this money? the Working Tax payer, much will go on Booze,cigarettes, bingo. Not on the kids
My wife and I had to support our own family.
when couples get married now they must have everything, Washing machines, fridges, Television DVD's
why should the taxpayer subsidise them
mike, cyprus,
Emily - This isn't connected with our government, it'd be something the Tories may consider. Our current government does nothing much to promote the traditional British family; if my wife stays at home and looks after our kids, she is considered a layabout and gets nothing, if however she puts our children into daycare and looks after other peoples kids as a registered childminder (which she is) she is considered by "New Labour" as a decent working British Citizen...
ch, Cumbria, uk
What's happened to equal rights? I look after our child whilst the wife works - can i not claim for being male? Sexism surely.
mark, dartford,
I worked fulltime for forty years and brought up a family with no help from the govrnment , now i am a pensioner i seem to be invisible when it comes to dishing out more money. We workers kept this country going after the war and now we are expendable .I agree that parents should finance their children not the state plus it will encourage large families and the world is over populated enough.
Sabina Hastings, Nottingham, Britain
Cameron is on the right track and we should soon see the end of this hopeless labour government. Hopefully, after the mess they have made of dear old England, they will never again get back into government.
D Case, Newquay,
That is more than carers of the sick and disabled get!! How much do largely unpaid carers save the country and yet no government ever considers helping them. It's always people with children. If you can't afford children - don't have them
JW, Boston, UK
Finally, a policy that is not means tested, and will redress the awful imbalance that affects parents (my wife in our case) who care more about our children than working to buy the latest and greatest 'stuff' by staying at home and doing what a mother should.
Dave, you are on the right track.
Tony Humphreys, Prestatyn, UK
IF PEOPLE WANT CHILDREN THEY CAN PAY FOR THEM THEMSELVES - HAVING CHILDREN IS NOT A RIGHT -
iI would love a new car - are they going to pay for it?
These families who breed to keep themselves on a meal ticket for life - if this goes ahead - they must be laughing!
Why is it that people expect the gov to fund their lifestyle choice?
Margaret, Bristol, UK
This is fantastic. I have 3 under 5's and I cant work because it would cost me more in childcare than I could earn. This is prove the government are understanding things at last!
Emily, weston-super-mare, weston-super-mare
Well thats one day of nursery fees nearly. Just the other four days to find now and at £58 per day which is the standard day rate for all nursery's in our area having kids in the UK aint cheap.
stuart, london, England
Mothers? Is it the Times being sexist or the Conservative party? Are fathers with children under three not to be given the same allowance?
Mike, plymouth, uk