Isabel Oakeshott, Deputy Political Editor
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Wealthy fathers who fail to pay generous child maintenance to their ex-wives risk having their shares and property portfolios plundered by the government.
Under the plans, mothers who successfully claim they deserve more money for child support will also be able to claim a share in any profits their ex-partners make from selling assets – even those acquired long after the divorce. And authority will be given to civil servants to raid the father’s bank account and withdraw lump sums.
Lawyers warn that the new organisation to replace the much-criticised Child Support Agency (CSA) is also likely to face disarray as fathers challenge it on human rights grounds.
Kim Fellowes, a family law expert who has briefed MPs, said: “Ministers are rubbing their hands in glee because these extraordinary new powers have gone through on the nod, but when they come into force, there will be chaos. There will be endless appeals.”
The CSA is being axed after failing to recover £3.5 billion from errant parents, the majority of them fathers. The new agency, The Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (CMEC), is to be far tougher and will be given powers to take payments directly from wage packets.
The new laws will also give officials powers to impose “lump sum deduction orders” – to take money from bank accounts and intercept money fathers make from selling a house or flat before it even reaches their bank. Fellowes, who chairs the child support committee at Resolution, the 5,000-strong body of family lawyers, said: “The plans are a mess.”
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Yet another example of Government interference in people's lives. More injustice and misery will result than otherwise.
People should be encouraged to take responsibility for their own decisions in life and get on with it.
Simon, Panjim, India
Yet again the sister in government are warring on fathers.
Contrary to the spin in the newspaper on dead beat dads most of the money owed to the CSA was THEIR fault - they simply failed to collect it despite men trying to pay.
Sort the law courts out
phil, newcastle, UK
One thing that hasn't changed under CMEC plans, which was the root cause of CSA failures, is the ability to differentiate between real Feckless absent parents vs Non-Resident Parents who dearly wish to play an active and supportive role in their child's life, but are thwarted from doing so.
David Thomas, Manchester, England
Is there going to be any similar punishment for mothers who stop their children seeing their father.
Richard Garland, Manchester,
Same old story.
All the NuLab feminists and their ministerial lickspittles want to do is expell fathers from the family, whilst ripping off our money.
Yet another reason to vote them out at the next election.
Chris, Wokingham, England
If the CSA had been fair, and communicated with the absent parent in a humane way, encouraging the estranged parents to co-operate on the expenses of raising children instead of taking the opportunity to punish Non Resident Parents, for the crime of being (mostly) men would've been a lot less pain.
PF Darlington, London, England
The CSA has annihilated thousands of innocent dads (not 'errant parents' ) who have struggled, to pay their dues. The CSA always demands more, whether based on false figures or just picked from a hat.
If they go after someone famouus like Paul McCartney the system could be exposed for what it is.
Alison Waugh, Edinburgh, Scotland