We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times

Gordon Brown intervened yesterday to signal his personal intention to phase out the use by Britain’s Armed Forces of all cluster bombs.
A statement put out by his official spokesman electrified the international conference on cluster bombs, which has been going on for three days in Dublin with the aim of reaching a treaty prohibiting their use. Human rights activists interpreted it as a significant switch in British policy.
The Downing Street spokesman said that the Prime Minister had asked the Ministry of Defence to review the risk to civilians posed by the last two remaining weapons deployed with the Armed Forces, the artillery-fired M85 and the helicopter-launched M73.
Until yesterday, the British position in Dublin had been in favour of a treaty, provided the two systems were excluded. It was claimed that they still had a justified military application for the protection of British troops overseas. They emphasised that the weapons had self-destruct mechanisms so that they did not pose a long-term threat to civilians.
However, Downing Street sources said the Prime Minister’s statement was intended to make it clear to the negotiators in Dublin that he wanted such systems to be phased out. One source said: “The Prime Minister believes that the MoD has been dragging its feet over the cluster bomb issue and he wants to force the agenda. He recognises that if the two weapon systems were scrapped it would leave a capability gap. He understands that, but he wants them to be phased out.”
The M85 and M73 are known as direct-fire weapons and the Government has previously argued that they are not the same as other cluster bombs that are dropped indiscriminately over a wide area and lie around for years as a threat to civilians. The systems have submunitions that spread out to have maximum impact on enemy tanks and other armoured vehicles. The M85 has forty-nine submunitions and the M73 has nine.
Mr Brown’s spokesman said: “The Prime Minister has issued instructions to our negotiators that we should work intensively to ban cluster bombs that cause unacceptable harm to civilians. The Prime Minister has asked the MoD to assess the remaining munitions in use [the M85 and M73] to ensure that there is no risk to civilians. We are clear that our forces will always operate in strict accordance with international humanitarian law.”
The statement seemed to take the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the MoD by surprise. Officials from both departments insisted that there was no change in the British negotiating position in Dublin and that the M85 and M73 were still regarded as essential weapons, until such time as an alternative could be found.
However, the officials said that they did not want to preempt what might be agreed when the conference ends on May 30.
Mark Garlasco of Human Rights Watch UK, speaking from the Dublin conference, said that Mr Brown’s statement was being interpreted “as a major switch in policy”.
He added: “If there is a move by the UK to examine whether the Armed Forces still need the M85 and M73, this could be a really positive development.”
The conference is being attended by representatives of 100 countries, but with notable absentees - the United States, Russia and Israel among them.
Norway’s delegates yesterday came up with a proposal to ban all cluster submunitions over a certain weight. Under that scheme, both the M85 and M73 would be banned.
On Monday, in a letter to The Times, nine former top British military commanders urged the Government to scrap its stock of cluster bombs.
Multiple menace
— Cluster bombs were first used in the Second World War
— They consist of containers that open in the air and scatter “bomblets” over a wide area.
— Many fail to detonate, and thousands of civilians have later been killed or injured
— At least 21 states and four areas of Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Europe are affected
— British forces fired 102,900 M85 cluster submunitions in Iraq in the 2003 war
Source: International Committee of the Red Cross
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool/Teeside
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It would actually make more sense to limit submunitions that are below a certain weight (rather than ones which are above a given weight). The lower the weight, the higher the probability that the submunitions will be damaged on landing, therefore damaging the safety mechanisms.
Ed, Dundee, Scotland
Labour would rather our troops are disadvantage in the war zone than provide them the correct tools they need to be sucessful on operations.
steve tea, manchester, cheshire
well brown is a supporter of the fantasy euro-army, which will absolutely never ever do any fighting, especially not against anyone not from africa who carries more than an ak, so we really won't be needing them. we might as well chuck the rifles down too, let the yanks get us out of trouble as ever
thomas, norwich, uk
it's his "personal intention" is it? He is clutching at straws trying to find a subject that people will support him on. Instead all he is doing is making himself a laughing stock. I seriously doubt if Mr Brown will be returned at the next election.
Fred Smith, Edinburgh, Scotland
He's at it again Mr Successful........not. The lunatics in charge of the asylum.
Wars need to be won or else we lose our freedoms
Oh I was forgetting Databases for phone calls and emails....Freedoms....theyve already gone
mike, leeds,
All weapons of war need to be reviewed for there acceptability. We must put our minds to reviewing every product that we use today and judge it against the environment costs. Nuclear weapons and fossil fuels are two products which should be banned.
JIm Wills, Brisbane, Australia
Cluster bombs are a form of "state terror "- they lie in wait have and will kill and maime more innocent civilians & children than all suicide bombings put togther.
Michael J , Leicester, UK
Ridding ourselves of area denial weapons means more soldiers killed as they have to go back into previously cleared areas.
Politicians should have little say on what systems are phased out, simply because they have no idea what the hell they're talking about.
Phill , The Wirral, England
I suppose Brown will recommend the use of flour bombs instead.
P.Robinson, Northants, Engand
Live updates from Dublin by treaty delegates:
http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/clusters/update.htm
Excerpt: "Were now deep into negotiations on the treaty details, spending long hours in conference rooms. Occasionally we tear off the translations headphones and sprint off to brief the press...
Jim, New York, New York
I'm glad that Brown was not Prime Minister in the second world war.
Graham Voisey, Brixham, England
Mmmmm, asking the military, in a war, where they are being killed, and trying to kill, to act in accordance with humanitarian law? "Sorry, that bullet I just put in you was shot with due consideration for your personal humanitarian rights"!!!! The military are there for a reason. Accept it.
David L, Brussels,
Gordon Brown is Neville Chamberlain - 'Peace in Our Time!'
Paul Francis, Brisbane, Australia