Philip Webster and Francis Elliott
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Gordon Brown has ruled out resigning if he loses the 42-day anti-terrorism vote as ministers and whips unleashed a fierce campaign to dissuade Labour backbenchers from opposing the Government.
The day after the Prime Minister put his authority on the line by refusing any concessions over the 42-day detention plan, he insisted that the vote next week would not be an issue of confidence.
He said that the proposal would be put to Parliament “in the normal way”, meaning that it would not be a confidence vote. Ministers recalled that Tony Blair also had not made defeat on the 90-day detention proposal a resignation matter. For Mr Brown to have done so would have been perilous, given that the outcome looked to be on a knife-edge last night.
Despite Mr Brown’s defiance, ministers and whips are agreed that the Prime Minister is so weakened after recent setbacks that a Commons defeat would further erode his battered authority and throw the Government into turmoil. Referring to yesterday’s article by Mr Brown in The Times, in which he refused to water down the 42-day idea, a whip said: “He has decided to stand by his principles. That is all very well but we now have to save him from himself.”
Ann Widdecombe, the Tory former Home Office minister, said that she was prepared to vote with the Government as long as there was a “sunset clause”, requiring the legislation to be renewed each year by Parliament.
Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, told Labour MPs last night that there would be concessions to tighten safeguards around the 42-day plan, which will be published today. As the party’s MPs returned in a grim mood from the spring recess, however, whips warned them that, if they insisted on defeating the Prime Minister, the impact on Labour’s already slim long-term chances could be catastrophic. “We are being told that disunited parties will lose and that we should swallow our pride and come on board,” one firm rebel said.
Speaking to a packed meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party, which was not attended by Mr Brown, the Home Secretary promised three sets of concessions: reducing from about 30 days to a week the period during which Parliament has to approve detention powers; cutting from 60 days to 30 the period during which emergency powers could be used; and defining more precisely the conditions that would amount to an emergency.
It is understood that the “exceptional circumstances” needed to trigger the 42-day powers would be closely modelled on existing emergency legislation – a key Conservative demand.
Ms Smith said after the meeting that she had detected clear movement among MPs towards accepting the proposals. She said that she had told them that the country expected them to take the necessary steps to defend national security.
Two MPs, Jim Devine and Richard Burden, are understood to have declared that they had heard enough to persuade them to vote for the Government next week. Others, including Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, and Andrew Dismore, chairman of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, will wait to see the detail of the concessions. Chris Mullin, a former Foreign Office minister, and Jeremy Corbyn and Paul Flynn, both of whom are serial rebels, spoke against the measures.
A potential lifeline for Mr Brown emerged last night from the Democratic Unionists. If their nine MPs abstain or vote for Mr Brown, his chances of defeat will be reduced.
David Davis, the Shadow Home Secretary, said that trying to increase precharge detention had turned into a “horrible political cul de sac” for the Prime Minister. In an interview with The Monitor he said: “I think the logic is probably something like this: Tony Blair was defeated on 90 days; and most of the people who voted against him were Brownites.
“Therefore, Brown thinks they will support him if he comes back with more of a compromise and tries to present it as a consensual argument: ‘I am likely to succeed where he failed’.”

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
He thought he had an easy job and would be more popular than TB, he misjudged that one! Unfortunately for us he is a classic example of good clerk but lousy manager.
For the sake of the country he should go
John Kerr, Edinburgh, SCOTLAND
Rae,
You want Britain to turn into the former GDR, with the police turning into the stasi? That's what these laws will do, and the terrorists will have won without firing a shot, because we will have changed the way we live.
Our ancestors died to protect our freedoms; don't dishonour them.
jules, London,
Rae, who is more effective at destroying our way of life, terrorists or this Government tearing up our constitutional and legal rights? With Habeas Corpus being part of our way of life since the Magana Carta, and this Government removing that right, I think it is very clear who we should fear!
Iain, Andover, England
Concessions on 42 days mean a very low probability of ever being used.
The point is now entirely political face-saving for Gordon Brown.
The Lords will vote this down - then what?
Spin it out until we are all judged to have forgotten the point?
jim ballantyne, sandhurst, uk
All the New labour lot should resign not just GB they are no good for the country. After the general election they will be lucky if they are the biggest party in opposition.
Geoffrey Fish, Pontefract, Yorkshire
Rae, David Davis IS sticking up for us. If we allow the government to lock people up without a charge being brought against them for increasingly lengthy periods then the enemy will already have won because we will no longer be living in a free country. If there is such a law it will be used on us!
Donald, Maidstone,
Brown is increasingly looking like Arthur Scargill in the 1980s - too afraid to put his position to the test in a ballot for fear of defeat.
He will never resign on a matter of principle as he has none. And he will only submit to an election when he has run out of time.
MarkS, Leeds,
As Brown has realised that he might lose the vote he has realised the threat to resign hasn't worked.
David Leslie, Perth, Scotland
so on this pretty important issue of civil liberty, the facts of the matter are not important to labour MP's. This is all about saving Browns skin. They should be ashamed of themselves.
paul, london,
When greater paowers are handed to government and police(eg all the current anti terrorism legislation) then they misuse them. Rae, the teror threat is far less then the governemnt says - Brown is terrorisng people like you so you supprt evil legislation.
Neil Murphy, cromer,
David Davis should be ashamed.The Govt and Brown deserve our support against those who would seek to destroy our way of life.
Rae, Dorset,
It is about civil liberty Rae. If you back this, then YOU are destroying our way of live and erroding our freedom. Labours law and order dog whistle is a lie
Steve, Norwich, Norfolk
Given that current emergency powers are being abused by local aothorities to spy on children rather than track down terrorists, extending government power to further erode basic freedoms is extremely dangerous and past experience shows the government will abuse this power to spy on innocent citizens
Peter, London,
Another U-turn from the Clunking Fist!
An empty threat is one thing, I suppose. When the threat looks certain to require a follow through, we can rely on Gordon to bottle it!
Charles, Hong Kong,
David Davis should be ashamed. The Govt and Brown deserve our support against those who would seek to destroy our way of life. For once in his life, why doesn't Davis stick up for the public ahead of terrorists.
Rae, Dorset,