Jill Sherman, Michael Evans and Alexi Mostrous
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday

The senior intelligence official who left top-secret documents on a train was not authorised to take them out of Whitehall let alone read them on his way home.
Ed Miliband, the Cabinet Office Minister, admitted that there had been “a clear breach of security” when he announced that Sir David Omand, the former Permanent Secretary for Intelligence and Security, would lead an investigation into the case.
The incident comes only weeks before Sir Gus O’Donnell, the Cabinet Secretary, was due to publish his report on improving data security in Whitehall after discs with child benefit records were lost in the post.
The 37-year-old Ministry of Defence official, who has been suspended pending a police investigation, had been seconded to the Cabinet Office for intelligence work. Soon after 6pm yesterday he was taken from his Hampshire house by senior government officials after being identified as the man who lost documents about al-Qaeda and Iraqi security forces.
Although The Times knows his identity the name is not being published after advice from Whitehall that it would place him in danger from terrorists.
The civil servant, who had the highest security clearance, provided analysed reports for the Joint Intelligence Committee using information provided by MI6, the Government Communications Headquarters in Cheltenham and foreign intelligence services.
There were some suggestions in Whitehall that the official, who is understood to earn about £70,000 a year, had written the reports. But the Cabinet Office denied suggestions by the MP Andrew Mackinlay in the Commons that he was a member of MI5.
One of the documents is a seven-page report by the Joint Intelligence Committee on “al-Qaeda vulnerabilities” and referred to assessments of the terrorist organisation in Afghanistan and Pakistan. It was considered so sensitive that each page was marked “For UK, US, Canadian and Australian eyes only”.
The Metropolitan Police has started an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the loss of the documents, which were left in an orange folder on a train from Waterloo to Surrey on Tuesday. They were handed to the BBC, which returned them to the Government on Wednesday.
Mr Miliband reassured the Commons that there was no evidence national security interests had been damaged or that any individuals or operations were at risk.
He told MPs that the rules about how confidential documents should be removed from Whitehall had not been followed. Documents can be taken on public transport but they have to be kept inside a locked briefcase with two straps at all times. The key should be carried in the owner’s pocket and the case must be held. On no account should the papers be read while in transit in case they are seen by other passengers or left behind.
“This was a clear breach of wellestablished security rules which forbid the removal of documents of this kind outside secure government premises,” Mr Miliband told MPs. In this case “no authorisation was sought”.
Francis Maude, the Shadow Cabinet Office Minister, said: “There can be few greater risks than the casual abandonment of top-secret intelligence material on a train.”
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice

Overseas contacts and local business information
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If I was cynical I might think that this happens far too often.
Why the Govt. has to be constantly censured for the stupid, unauthorised and perhaps even deliberate behaviour of civil servants I don't know.
Name, shame and sack would be my suggestion.
Ani, Sheffield,
Mike T. New York.
Because this government is dishonest. and incompetent. Papers handed into the police would have been returned and their loss covered up.
Ray Harvey, Hitchin, uk
its all nonsense .this man as well as other civil servants will have been taking documents like this home all the time, it just so happened he left them and his head will roll , lets not forget the Shredding of MP's expenses Now how convenient they got into the wrong hands and disapeared
lee harison, London, uk
"the name is not being published after advice from Whitehall that it would place him in danger." It's good to see the old security argument being used yet again to prevent a civil servant's career being ruined and his knighthood taken away. Yet Whitehall doesn't worry about our troops being hurt.
Peter Jones, Brighton, UK
And by what stretch of the imagination did the good citizen think that giving the papers to the BBC was the right thing to do? The decent thing would have been to hand them in to a police station.
Mike T, New York, USA
why waste Police time on this?
Everyone knows . Government =Incompetence and Spin.
ronnie, bucks, UK
Why on Earth were these documents ever printed out in the first place? Documents like this can be viewed by authorised officials on computer screens that they have to use a password to access. But once you commit them to paper, they are just an accident like this waiting to happen.
jon livesey, Sunnyvale, CA/USA
The person that left the papers lying around, can anyone tell me who he votes for
W DOREY, CROMER, NORFOLK
If these papers were wrongly removed by this gentleman, how was it possible for him to do this. Where was the security system that should have stopped this.
Oh I forgot !!, it is more important to police the people on the street because people in high office are to be trusted and we aren't.
barbara, north east,
these are the people we are to trust with all the information we will submit to get an ID card, all our fully computeriised medical records, I think not. How can one opt out of the data flow?
Phil Constable, Darlington,
Sack and jail whoever, and no matter who this is. His boss needs to go too, as this is an error of judgement of (potentially) cataclysmic proportions. This government is far to lax, and has been dancing round their handbags every time something like this happens. What's next? Do lives need to be los
gordon mcrobbie, aberdeen, aberdeen