The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday

His leader may be beleaguered and his party staggering through a third term in government with a stricken economy, but one backbench MP still felt able to tell a voter where he could “stick” his vote.
Labour’s fight to regain the support of the electorate took a less conventional turn this week as David Clelland began an epistolary battle with one dissatisfied voter.
Mr Clelland, who has represented the people of Tyne Bridge in Newcastle for 23 years, has written to one resident informing him that he had no desire for his vote in the future.
“I accept your offer not to vote for me again,” he wrote, in bold defiance of the usual conventions that exist in communications between elected representatives and their electorate. “I do not want your vote so you can stick it wherever best pleases you.”
Mr Clelland, 64, offered this advice in response to a letter from Gary Scott, 27, an IT salesman with concerns over civil liberties.
Mr Scott had written to his MP once before, while living in a different part of the city, a constituency represented by a Liberal Democrat MP. “He was kind enough to write a considerate reply and I hope you will do the same,” Mr Scott wrote. He then detailed his concerns. The Government was authoritarian and out of touch. He could no longer ignore what he regarded as a “blatant power grab”.
Mr Clelland is regarded as a man of the Centre Left who votes broadly with the Labour mainstream: indeed, he was once a parliamentary whip. He voted in favour of identity cards and 42-day detention for terror suspects. He also voted for the hunting ban. He did stand up for civil liberties when it came to the smoking ban, perhaps because he is a pipe smoker.
Mr Scott was very disappointed with what he saw. “You vote with your party on pretty much every single issue,” he wrote. “It’s not your constituents you represent, it’s your party.”
He was sceptical of the usefulness of recent legislation, in particular the criminalisation of violent internet pornography, that was passed as part of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill. “Not saying any of this is my bag,” he wrote. “I just do not understand why anybody should have the right to prohibit consensual sexual behaviour at all.”
In short, he held the Government and Mr Clelland himself “responsible for destroying civil liberties that have been hard won from tyrannical monarchs over centuries”.
Concluding what he described as “a bit of ranting and raving from one of your constituents”, he said that if Mr Clelland continued “toeing the party line”, he could “kiss my vote goodbye”.
The warning did not have the desired effect. Mr Clelland replied accusing Mr Scott of arrogance for thinking that “you . . . represent the views of the people of our community”. This, Mr Clelland wrote, was his job.
After firing off his frank missive, Mr Clelland said that he had found his constituent’s letter offensive. Mr Scott, in turn, said that he was offended that his MP considered his letter offensive.
The battle of letters has now been followed by a war of words. “This just shows the arrogance of the man,” Mr Scott said. “He does not listen to the people he represents.”
Yesterday Mr Clelland told The Times that his constituent’s letter was “extremely abusive”.
“I’m not here to be dictated to like that,” he said. He allowed, however, that Mr Scott’s letter might have caught him “at a bad time”. Mr Clelland is the not the first Honourable Member to have allowed his true feelings to be heard. On announcing his intention to step down from Parliament, Tony Banks said that working with his constituents had been “intellectually numbing” and “tedious in the extreme”.
On another occasion an aide to Dari Taylor, MP, advised his boss that there was “no rush” to help a constituent who was a “snotty” woman who “hates the Government”. The advice was accidentally e-mailed directly to the constituent.
Michael Stern, MP for Bristol North West until 1997, named one of his constituents as a “neighbour from hell”.
After electoral defeat in 1996, Gordon Bilney wrote to a committee saying: “One of the great pleasures of private life is that I need no longer be polite to the nincompoops, bigots, curmudgeons and twerps who infest local government bodies and committees such as yours.”
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice

Overseas contacts and local business information
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Jim, Consett,
I totally agree with you that "Only a fool could think that an MP can represent the individual views of 45,000 voters".
Besides, who on earth knows whether Mr Scott ever gave Mr Clelland his vote in the first place!
Martin, Rome, Italy
MP's are in place to serve the people. If Mr Clelland has time to write obnoxious letters, perhaps he also has time to serve. He could have conducted himself in a much better manner, and ought to have done so. The fact that he put his thoughts in writing suggests naivity in the extreme.Disgraceful
Robert, Tokyo, Japan
Well done Mr Clelland. It seems that Mr Scott feels that he can right a very frank letter to his MP but that the MP cannot write an equally frank one back.
David Gwilliam, Leicester, England
I never realised that Gordon Bilney, a minister in the Australian government of Paul Keating, was also a member of the House of Commons. He actually said this after he was defeated in the Australian federal election of 1996. He got a laugh, but people wondered why he went into politics at all.
Terry Barnes, Melbourne, Australia
This just shows how democracy here is dead. I get invited to vote only once every 5 years. The parties market their policies, then when elected focus on totally different policies and legislation.
ken, Coventry, UK
I think the main issue is that both assume they have the right to say / represent what the people want . So should a politician represent what the people say or his (party) philisophy? If people say 'eliminate petrol taxes' to their MP's, will parliament enact such law or talk down to the voter ?
Vince, B'Kara , MALTA
talk about arrogance an mp who tells somebody to stick his vote for having the cheek to write to him.he might not like what he read but what was wrong with a polite reply.he is not the only labour mp who thinks he is untouchable in his safe seat and 1 vote won,t matter.well it just might come 2010
brian rice, halifax, england
What's this?
An MP expressing himself frankly and in a forthright manner? I doubt that he will be tolerated for much longer by the Party, even though he has got the arrogant dismissiveness required, he lacks the skills necessary for dissembling.
Kidd Garrett, Bristle, Zoiderzetshire
I'm with Mr Clelland on this. He was in effect being held to ransom......
"he said that if Mr Clelland continued toeing the party line, he could kiss my vote goodbye. "
Mr Clelland responded as i would . He is not there to be dictated to or abused. He is been the representative for 23 years.
Steve, Liverpool,
Why should David Clelland care, he realises he'll be out of a job in a couple of years at most. He'll then be pretty well unemployable, especially after this outburst of petulance.
David Leslie, Scotland, Scotland
Unfortunately this little spat, shows the consequences of our way of democracy; the elected dictatorship. MP's are there to vote with their conscience, not their constituents conscience; otherwise we would still have the death penalty etc. Once in, the MP can do and vote how he(or party) pleases
Barry, London, UK
Clelland was voted in by and is responsible for , the well being of his constituents. He like many others, Labour and Liberal, will find that they will shortly be paying the price for not representing their views. The Lisbon treat comes to mind.
Nigel Williams, Madrid, Spain.
In so many cases, give a man previously without any power--M P. after their name, and the desire to excercise knows no bounds! We the taxpayers are their employers, let them remember it.
David Vinter, Louth, Lincs,, UK.
And Clelland accuses Mr Scott of arrogance...?
eric, paris,
As Petr Clutton remarks, Mr Scott spoke for most of us voters. And Mr Clelland spoke, loud and clear, for Nu Labour. After 11 years in power, they seem to have forgotten about us altogether.
We shall indeed stick our vote wherever it pleases us; and it won't be in the box marked "Labour".
Tom Welsh, Basingstoke,
Very enterprising - and very expensive - of Mr Scott to canvas the opinions of all Mr Clelland's constituents on all the questions upon which he had voted in the House!
Though, since he appears to be part of "Informed Consent"s single-issue letter-writing campaign, I suspect he didn't.
Ian Kemmish, Biggleswade, UK
This is not surprising but it is good to see NuLab's true colours. Their MPs long ago gave up the pretense that they repesent their constituents, all of them think their job is to dictate the party line. "parliamentery democracy" is no longer an excuse not to provide referenda.
MrDavies, UK,
Our MPs are overpaid, greedy, arrogant and out-of-touch. That is why I am standing against David Davis and promse to give half my MP salary to charity. About 80% of our laws now come from the EU, yet our MPs want more salary and more expenses. It's time for voters to show we are tired of MPs' greed
david craig, bournemouth, uk
I know a lot about one case in his constituency when his distraught constituent saw him about the unlawful deportation of her husband to one of the most dangerous countries in the world, and she proved the illegality of the Home Office, but he did sweet nothing for her and her family.
Edwin Fleming, Portstewart, Northern Ireland
The MP has listened and has apparently wrote to Mr Scott. He can not do much more than that. He has made it clear that he does not want his vote. That seems perfectly reasonable to me. Only a fool could think that an MP can represent the individual views of 45,000 voters
Jim, Consett, UK
Mr Clelland has views which, like Mr Scott, I disagree with. He also has manners that everyone must disagree with.
Adele Paul, Barnet, UK
I think Mr Clelland has done the right thing to do with the first words that came to his mind. Phrases such as "otherwise you can kiss my vote goodbye" are arrogant and annoying.
Elisabetta, Rome, Italy
Elisabetta, Rome, Italy
Such a revelation when the mask slips and the arrogance of power stands for all to see!
In the US my own two Senators do not respond to letters complaining of the evisceration of civil liberties. No wonder libertarians like Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) resonate so strongly with the thoughtful.
Steve Richardson, MRSC(UK), Hillsborough, North Carolina, USA
Mr Clelland surely has a right to his say too. He has been elected for 5 years and he should not have to take abuse of anybody, just because they disagree with his policies. MPs work very hard and have a right to respect like the rest of us working people.
Keith, Ilford, UK
I have to laugh at his interpretation of "extremely offensive",the constituients letter can be viewed at
http://forums.hexus.net/question-time/141742-so-i-write-letter-my-mp-3.html#post1458004
Let's not forget that MP's are there to represent us in Parliment, we vote for a person, not a party!
Paul, Hemel Hempstead, England
To play devils advocate - it's nice to see an MP let his guard down, be honest and not think only of the public ramifications. Whichever side you agree with, open and honest conversation is something lacking in UK government.
Craig, Lincolnshire,
Mr Clelland doesn't like to be dictated to then! This doesn't seem to sit quite right, as he doesn't appear to mind being dictated to by the Labour hierachy and voting the way he is told.
Maybe he doesn't like facing a logical argument, he thinks he has little chance of winning!
Peter, Bristol, UK
MPs who's parties insist on implementing unwanted policies MUST accept this without complaint. It's called "Democracy" and it's usually great when it gives MPs £200k in allowances a year.
I urge the people of Huddersfield to eject Mr Clelland from office as soon as possible.
Paul, London,
Labour MP's will look very foolish making these kind of remarks when hundreds of them are out of a job the morning after the next General Election.
John, Manchester, UK
I have not seen Mr Scott's letter, but judging by Labour's behaviour I would not be surprised if they consider the truth to be a form of abuse.
Mr Scott seems a normal person, worried, like all of us in the Libertarian Party, about our freedoms and an ever more Authoritarian government.
Tim Carpenter LPUK, London, UK
This shows just how meaningless the voice of the constituent really is. Instead of our MP's being terrified of losing any vote, and trying their hardest to keep their electorate happy, they just tell us to sit down and shut up when we say "Hang on...I didn't sign up for this".
Jamie B, Bath, UK
Im not here to be dictated to like that states the dictator. Mind you, refreshingly honest.
David Masu, Zürich,
I have written to my mp 23 times using writetothem.com but she has ignored every one, I find that mp's are more out of touch then ever with the will of the people, instead only carring about the will of the part.
There is no way I want to live in the orwellian nightmare we going to end with.
MR W jones, Liverpool, England
This is what happens when Parliamentary researchers turn their back for a moment and let their bosses try answering the letters...
It's also very unprofessional. In the Office I work in abusive constituents still get a reply, even if it's "I think we agree to disagree".
Peter Dunn, London,
A constituent's letter "caught him at a bad time?" - that's his job! Great to see that he is qualified to be in it - not! Time he were given the opportunity to reflect at leisure outside the pressures of being an MP.
David, Athens, Greece
As the MP is appointed by his constituents, paid for by his constituents they should be able to have their contracts terminated by their constituents early! I mean before an election. This is an example as to how out of touch the government is on every single issue. We need a General Election.
roger Kingston, york,
Everyone should write to their MP to tell them how they really feel about things like civil liberties, taxation and the cost of the public sector. If you don't voice your opinion your MP will carry on regardless. Must write to mine again, he gets very shirty too!!
Evan Owen, Harlech, UK
Whatever happened to 'I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it'?
John, London, England
Gary Scott said what most people think of the labour party now.
good for him.
Petr Clutton, Wrexham, Wales