Philip Webster, Political Editor
Win VIP tickets
At least eight new nuclear power stations are to be approved within the next two years and built swiftly under fast-track planning procedures, The Times has learnt.
Gordon Brown believes that they will be needed to avoid an energy crisis in the next decade, and more will follow as the world tries to reduce its dependence on oil for power.
Some are likely to be built on sites that are already generating nuclear power - for example at Hinkley in Somerset, Sizewell in Suffolk, Bradwell in Essex and Dungeness in Kent - but people in other areas will be faced with a nuclear plant on their doorsteps for the first time.
The Prime Minister’s decision to fix a minimum number for new stations has emerged after last week’s G8 summit in Japan, where the switch from fuel to nuclear power was a key talking point. He is making plain that he is happy for the market to dictate the final total and wants to show the energy industry and its investors that Britain has a long-term commitment to the expansion of nuclear energy.
At a meeting of European Union and Mediterranean nations in Paris yesterday, he called for “a renaissance of nuclear power”. He added: “Britain is now moving quickly to replace its ageing fleet of nuclear power stations. And all around the world I see renewed interest in this technology as countries contemplate the alternative: continued oil dependence and unchecked climate change.”
Since the G8 Mr Brown has told colleagues that everyone at the summit, including leaders from China, India, Brazil and the African nations who joined the regular G8 lineup, were enthusiastically discussing the need for moves to alternative supplies.
He has already called on oil-producing countries to start investing now in new energy technologies to be ready for the day when oil starts to run out.
Britain has ten nuclear stations with a total of 19 reactors in use, generating a total of 10 gigawatts of electricity, about 20 per cent of the country’s energy needs. By 2023 all but one - Sizewell B - will be obsolete. By then about a third of the country’s coal and oil-fired stations will have been ruled out of use by environmental legislation. The new generation of medium-sized nuclear reactors generate 1.2 gigawatts each, which is why Mr Brown says that at least eight are required to make up for the lost stations.
The Government is pushing through a Planning Bill that will streamline and speed up procedures by putting big infrastructure decisions in the hands of a new commission, rather than local councils. The aim is to cut current lengthy delays to less than a year.
Ministers are awaiting applications from the big energy companies and will then confirm the location of the proposed new sites, most of which will be at or near existing locations. Energy company companies say that under the timetable the new sites can begin generating electricity by 2017.
The siting of any new reactors in Scotland is expected to be opposed by Scottish Nationalists, who would use any attempt by Westminster to impose them on the Scots to attack Mr Brown.
Greenpeace said last night that a decision to go for at least eight stations was bad news for the fight against climate change. “Only two weeks ago Mr Brown was telling us we could plug the energy gap and meet the emissions target with renewable energy. Now that historic project could be threatened if money and political will is instead directed at nuclear power,” a spokesman said.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The whole subject of nuclear power in England should be the preserve of an English parliament and government debated and voted in by the people of England and not the United Kingdom. It is totally wrong that the MP for Cowdenbeath in Scotland has any say in English affairs.
J Blitz, London , England ,
Building more nuclear power stations is a good idea and this decision should have been taken ten years ago. The biggest worry is contained in the first sentence; "built swiftly".
All design and build work should be done by UK staff/workers to ensure there are "British Jobs for British People".
John, London, UK
So, less bureaucracy and procrastination than the typical British method of having one committee after another until there's a change of government. Amazing. The Government also now needs to fast-track the problem of nuclear waste, and just get on with the job as Finland is currently doing.
David, Cheshire,
The Times hasn't really explained the English/Scottish divide very well here. Basically, the Scottish government has said NO nuclear reactors will be built in Scotland. As the Scottish government has full powers to say this, all the new stations will therefore be built in England. End of story.
Chris, Northampton, England
The Planning Bill which will build the nuclear power stations is only relevant to England. It does not apply to Scotland - and although in theory it applies to Wales, because of the fear of upsetting Plaid, won't be implemented there, or indeed in Kirkcaldy. Time for an English Parliament.
Alfie, Ormskirk, England.
They should have seen it coming and started years ago, after all they import nuclear generated power from France and have done so for years.
M Wilson, Bidache, france
I live very close to Hunterston Power station its across the water the number of people with Cancer here seems to be increasing all the time. If they are so safe why don't they build them in London preferably Westminster
imacomputerbuddie, millport, scotland
Good, at last government is doing what it is supposed to do namely govern. Now lets see some similar decisive attitude to road and rail expansion instead of allowing the tree huggers to abuse the system.
mike gee, bournemouth, uk
Better late than never. Britain should have done this 20 years ago. At the moment we're importing 20% of our peak electricity from French nuke power stations.
A remarkable turn-around, too from the loony left, many of whom clobbered nuclear power in the Sixties & Seventies.
Oops!
Sue, Winchester, Hamps
Go back to coal. There is plenty of it. With scrubbers the pollutants can be removed. There are no long term decommissioning costs other than converting them into art galleries. It will create employment. The CO2 will be taken up by plants and lead to increased food production. All problems solved!
william Haines, Northwood,
This should have been done 5 years ago. Instead we have had dithering which will cost us dearly
Wade, Croydon, UK
When I see the owners of the power stations (not the workers, but the very people who make money from it), living next to them, I'll be happy that they are run safely!
Arthur, Newcastle,
Presumably we are talking about nuclear fusion energy here? It would be interesting to know what plans for disposal of nuclear waste will be required by the planning authorities.
Clare, Gwaenysgor, Wales
The Greenpeace response is telling. THey care not for energy security or even lower emissions - they want renewables come what may as part of their "Green Religion".
Roger Thornhill, London, UK